The TX accident looks like the crew stalled the aircraft or that they were trying to operate it below VMC.
A contributing factor that would explain either is the apparent the loss of an engine, but the good engine should have had enough power to fly the aircraft out of danger, unless the aircraft was loaded beyond allowable gross, if only for the available runway and ambient temperature.
If the accident aircraft had a crew of two plus eight passengers plus their baggage plus enough fuel to fly to FL, who knows?
I'll also note that if an engine failure were involved, this would have been the worst possible point in any flight to have lost one and many pilots and their passengers have been done in in these situations.
A heavily loaded twin, even a turbine and even within allowable certification limits that lost an engine right after breaking ground would give the crew few options and none of them are good.
Put it back down and run off the end of the available runway, land straight ahead or continue on the running engine.
No real standout choices in this situation so the crew probably elected to take the safest course of action they could determine and ended up rolling snake eyes.
Sad.
Will be interested in what the NTSB finds or doesn't, since they bat around .500 on probable causes.