Originally Posted By: AzFireGuy79
Im getting back to you now. You assume that I have yet to read this fine SAE paper authored by two GM employees. Its old news. Big surprise that two GM folks would want to slant things to GM's favor! I remember seeing nothing regarding Amsoil, Redline etc, especially with respect to additive packages of these aftermarket fluids. You and your boy Critic can agree all day long. Where is your proof that Amsoil and Redline have LESS additives!?
The SAE is not owned by General Motors. Nor is owned by any automaker. It is a professional organization for automotive engineers. Engineers from GM, Ford, Toyota, you name it, are part of this organization.
When papers are published to the SAE, they are first peer reviewed. If you are not familiar with the process of peer review, I suggest that you become familiar with it before you begin making such ignorant statements.
In addition, there are fluids from many different OEMs in that paper. In no way was that paper written to benefit GM, the paper was written to prove a point about multi-vehicle fluids. Lastly, I did not say Redline or Amsoil had fewer additives. I said that I have yet to see any proof that their multi-vehicle additive package could satisfy all of the different OEM requirements.
Originally Posted By: AzFireGuy79
Again prove your theory about additives.
Prove what? Prove that each OE fluid has a different additive package and that they behave very differently? Just go read page 5 of the SAE paper, I think it will provide you with all of the proof that you are looking for.
Im getting back to you now. You assume that I have yet to read this fine SAE paper authored by two GM employees. Its old news. Big surprise that two GM folks would want to slant things to GM's favor! I remember seeing nothing regarding Amsoil, Redline etc, especially with respect to additive packages of these aftermarket fluids. You and your boy Critic can agree all day long. Where is your proof that Amsoil and Redline have LESS additives!?
The SAE is not owned by General Motors. Nor is owned by any automaker. It is a professional organization for automotive engineers. Engineers from GM, Ford, Toyota, you name it, are part of this organization.
When papers are published to the SAE, they are first peer reviewed. If you are not familiar with the process of peer review, I suggest that you become familiar with it before you begin making such ignorant statements.
In addition, there are fluids from many different OEMs in that paper. In no way was that paper written to benefit GM, the paper was written to prove a point about multi-vehicle fluids. Lastly, I did not say Redline or Amsoil had fewer additives. I said that I have yet to see any proof that their multi-vehicle additive package could satisfy all of the different OEM requirements.
Originally Posted By: AzFireGuy79
Again prove your theory about additives.
Prove what? Prove that each OE fluid has a different additive package and that they behave very differently? Just go read page 5 of the SAE paper, I think it will provide you with all of the proof that you are looking for.