Originally Posted by UncleDave
Originally Posted by dakota99
As much as I don't like the questionable history of the ZF I also don't care for the colorado, ranger nor the tacoma. I've looked at all and you just can't replicate the ride quality and build quality feel of the honda.
This is correct nothing delivers the hondas mix of dynamics -
In the mountains where you have every combo of nature from twisty canyon roads to washboard dirt, sand, mud, snow, rain and rocks all in the days journey the ridgeline is the supreme middle ground tool, being surprisingly competent off road, hauling and towing while absolutely shredding everything else in driving dynamics and long trip dynamics and economy with sedan like comfort and handling.
UD
Wow, a refreshingly logical argument for the Honda. Usually every time you see someone post anything about a Ridgeline you can bet that you'll hear...
#1 'Its not a truck' / 'Its a minivan with a bed'
#2 'It doesn't have a real frame'
#3 'You can't tow [X/Y/Z] with it' (X/Y/Z) being some form of load that is indeed too big to tow with it.
#4-100000 Too many others to list.
What no one will admit is that it is a perfectly reasonable tool for its intended purpose. It's not meant to be a work truck or tow truck, but it is really good at doing light work for a homeowner, and it drives like an Accord to boot.
When I finally give up my 2003 Accord, I'll probably pick up a used Ridgeline. I don't drive far to work, so the gas penalty isn't terrible for me, and I sure would like to haul stuff around for the house without having to borrow a truck or trailer.