Looks like in this article, synthetic has absolutely no advantage over conventional oil in flow properties.
What I'm getting from this article is you can run a conventional oil and a synthetic oil in the same engine and you're going to get the same wear on the top piston bearing. It seems the only advantage synthetic has over conventional is that it has extra additive to protect once the oil passes the hydrodynamic and mixed film stages.
If so, why do they say synthetic "flows" better in cold weather? If, according to this article, they both have the same flow properties, then what is the deal with this claim?
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/effects-of-shearing/
What I'm getting from this article is you can run a conventional oil and a synthetic oil in the same engine and you're going to get the same wear on the top piston bearing. It seems the only advantage synthetic has over conventional is that it has extra additive to protect once the oil passes the hydrodynamic and mixed film stages.
If so, why do they say synthetic "flows" better in cold weather? If, according to this article, they both have the same flow properties, then what is the deal with this claim?
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/effects-of-shearing/