Ford 5.4l 3v design /5w20

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mississippi,

GT500 is different machine from the F150 5.4. The clearance may be the same, haven't confirmed, but the 5.4l 3v on utilizes more circular bearings(diminishes oil bleed) and a high volume/high pressure lubrication system (75 psi@2000rpm spec'd to 5w20).
 
Modularv8, you said:

Originally Posted By: modularv8
Another thing about these modulars is that they have no cam bearings and ride directly on the aluminum head with small clearances, therefore thinner lubricants 5w20/5w30 are needed to insure lubrication.


How can I make this any more clear for you, the Modular's cam-to-journal clearance does not require 20/30-weight lubricants to "ensure lubrication".
 
Relax Mississippi, run your 15w50 in your machine. You're right, the extra varnish you get from the extra heavy duty weight probably puts a barrier to wear to "ensure lubrication".
 
Without talking minute specs, if you feel running anything other than 5w20 is detrimental to the 5.4l 3v you are saying all non-US motors with exact same parts are being damaged becuase Ford is calling for 5w30 on these motors?
 
Originally Posted By: Rocko1
Without talking minute specs, if you feel running anything other than 5w20 is detrimental to the 5.4l 3v you are saying all non-US motors with exact same parts are being damaged becuase Ford is calling for 5w30 on these motors?


Because 5w30 shears into a 20 grade the majority of the time. 20 grade oils have been used in a variety of applications for many years. It was unless you tested used oil you never knew. Now people are coming out of the woodwork 5W20=bad. The correct viscosity must be chosen for the correct application. I use nothing but 5W-20 in my 5.4 3V not because of CAFE or because Ford recommends it. I choose it because it works, Ford recommends it and I have no need to go higher. Once the need arises I will use a higher viscosity oil. Also your arguments are based less on facts and for either a need to argue your point of view without merit and with hearsay. Is 5W20 correct for every application no. But 25W-60 is not either both if not used in the correct manner will help destroy a engine faster if not used in the correct application. If you want to argue merits of 5W20 is only for CAFE and engine protection is compromised you are over a decade late Ford and Honda recommended 5W-20 in 2001 and the majority of cars and trucks that are not in use today from 2001 is not due to engine failure. So I am sorry to rain on your parade but 5W20 is not inadequate but it is better than most people believed it could be and is better than good enough what ever enough is.
 
Originally Posted By: dave1251
Originally Posted By: Rocko1
Without talking minute specs, if you feel running anything other than 5w20 is detrimental to the 5.4l 3v you are saying all non-US motors with exact same parts are being damaged becuase Ford is calling for 5w30 on these motors?


Also your arguments are based less on facts and for either a need to argue your point of view without merit and with hearsay.


Ford does not call for 5w20 on it's 4.6 3V in EU or AUS. This is not hearsay. Ford stated in their TSB back speccing 5w20 on cars/trucks that were originally requiring 10w30, that it was for mpg gains. This is not hearsay. How are these two points without merit? The claim that the engines were designed with only 5w20 in mind because of the tight tolerances is hearsay and is not correct according to Ford engineers.
 
Originally Posted By: Rocko1
Originally Posted By: dave1251
Originally Posted By: Rocko1
Without talking minute specs, if you feel running anything other than 5w20 is detrimental to the 5.4l 3v you are saying all non-US motors with exact same parts are being damaged becuase Ford is calling for 5w30 on these motors?


Also your arguments are based less on facts and for either a need to argue your point of view without merit and with hearsay.


Ford does not call for 5w20 on it's 4.6 3V in EU or AUS. This is not hearsay. Ford stated in their TSB back speccing 5w20 on cars/trucks that were originally requiring 10w30, that it was for mpg gains. This is not hearsay. How are these two points without merit? The claim that the engines were designed with only 5w20 in mind because of the tight tolerances is hearsay and is not correct according to Ford engineers.



Yet you have not presented any simple data were engine longevity or durability has been compromised. 10w30? Is this a counterpoint because 5W30 shears into a 20 grade? In 2001 this happened just like it does today. I am willing to wager it happened faster in 2001 than today due to stay in grade requirements for motor oils. I may be a simpleton because 5W20 protects well enough to provide very very long engine life and yet motor oils performance just improves. But every change is provides less service life because it is different than what many people perceive is a inferior recommendation? If we followed this way of thinking I would be using SAE 40 in the summer and SAE 20 in the winter and if I needed to thin out the oil I would add kerosine. Carburetors, 165 degree thermostats, 3 speed autos, AM Radios, 12 month tuneups and leaded gasoline would still be in use. Because something is not what you are used to using does not mean inferior.
 
Originally Posted By: dave1251
Originally Posted By: Rocko1
Originally Posted By: dave1251
Originally Posted By: Rocko1
Without talking minute specs, if you feel running anything other than 5w20 is detrimental to the 5.4l 3v you are saying all non-US motors with exact same parts are being damaged becuase Ford is calling for 5w30 on these motors?


Also your arguments are based less on facts and for either a need to argue your point of view without merit and with hearsay.


Ford does not call for 5w20 on it's 4.6 3V in EU or AUS. This is not hearsay. Ford stated in their TSB back speccing 5w20 on cars/trucks that were originally requiring 10w30, that it was for mpg gains. This is not hearsay. How are these two points without merit? The claim that the engines were designed with only 5w20 in mind because of the tight tolerances is hearsay and is not correct according to Ford engineers.



Yet you have not presented any simple data were engine longevity or durability has been compromised. 10w30? Is this a counterpoint because 5W30 shears into a 20 grade? In 2001 this happened just like it does today. I am willing to wager it happened faster in 2001 than today due to stay in grade requirements for motor oils. I may be a simpleton because 5W20 protects well enough to provide very very long engine life and yet motor oils performance just improves. But every change is provides less service life because it is different than what many people perceive is a inferior recommendation? If we followed this way of thinking I would be using SAE 40 in the summer and SAE 20 in the winter and if I needed to thin out the oil I would add kerosine. Carburetors, 165 degree thermostats, 3 speed autos, AM Radios, 12 month tuneups and leaded gasoline would still be in use. Because something is not what you are used to using does not mean inferior.


Well you didn't address any of my points. 5w20 has plenty of applications. Thinking Ford designed the 5.4l 3V solely for use of the 5w20 and with the intent for the engines longevity is simply not true. Their document tells you why they switched most of the 10w30 applications to 5w20, mpg savings. If you think Ford did it simply becuase the 5w20 is a better oil for longevity, so be it.
 
So I retorted your

Originally Posted By: Rocko1
Without talking minute specs, if you feel running anything other than 5w20 is detrimental to the 5.4l 3v you are saying all non-US motors with exact same parts are being damaged becuase Ford is calling for 5w30 on these motors?

with

Because 5w30 shears into a 20 grade the majority of the time. 20 grade oils have been used in a variety of applications for many years. It was unless you tested used oil you never knew. Now people are coming out of the woodwork 5W20=bad.

Then you changed your argument to 10w30 when was that a recommend viscosity for Ford Modular?. If this was the recommend grade in 1991 I would prefer the "protection" of a modern 5W-20 over a 10w30 from 1991.
 
And we needed to revive a thread from 2 1/2 years ago for what reason?

Run whatever you want in your 3V. I choose 5w20 because it works and is what the manfacturer recommended. Pretty simple.
 
Originally Posted By: Rocko1

Ford does not call for 5w20 on it's 4.6 3V in EU or AUS.



The reason for this may be quite simple.. perhaps 5W20 is not as easily available in Europe?
 
Originally Posted By: Jim Allen
Note that all the big power modulars (to the best of my knowledge) do not use VCT.

VCT is really the only delineator that would pose a major viscosity choice problem to a modular V8.

ModularV8: Major kudos for finding that great description of VCT ops!

What I have been trying to find (I have an '05 F-150 5.4L V8) is what exactly happens when you make a big jump in viscosity. Such as a grade 40. There were some folks bragging about running 15W40 grade in the 3V engines and reporting no problems. I kinda doubt that, but I am still really curious as to how that heavy oil effected VCT operation.

Last year I had a great source on the Modular Engine engineering team at FoMoCo that was sharing lot of in depth stuff off the record. We were getting into VCT when he got his wee-wee whacked for speaking out of turn so I never did get the answers to my deep questions. Sigh!

Like you, I am sticking to 5W20 until I satisfy my informational needs. I wouldn't be afraid to use a 5W30, though. One day, when I catch up on other work, I may run 40 grade and Datalog VCT ops just to see.


When Ford was having problems with the sprockets on the 3V heads (04-06), the TSP said to run a 40 wt in them when they started making noise. Obviously they wouldn't recommend this if it was going to cause other issues with the engine. I do not think its as big of an issue as some would like to believe.
 
Originally Posted By: Jason8691
Originally Posted By: Jim Allen
Note that all the big power modulars (to the best of my knowledge) do not use VCT.

VCT is really the only delineator that would pose a major viscosity choice problem to a modular V8.

ModularV8: Major kudos for finding that great description of VCT ops!

What I have been trying to find (I have an '05 F-150 5.4L V8) is what exactly happens when you make a big jump in viscosity. Such as a grade 40. There were some folks bragging about running 15W40 grade in the 3V engines and reporting no problems. I kinda doubt that, but I am still really curious as to how that heavy oil effected VCT operation.

Last year I had a great source on the Modular Engine engineering team at FoMoCo that was sharing lot of in depth stuff off the record. We were getting into VCT when he got his wee-wee whacked for speaking out of turn so I never did get the answers to my deep questions. Sigh!

Like you, I am sticking to 5W20 until I satisfy my informational needs. I wouldn't be afraid to use a 5W30, though. One day, when I catch up on other work, I may run 40 grade and Datalog VCT ops just to see.


When Ford was having problems with the sprockets on the 3V heads (04-06), the TSP said to run a 40 wt in them when they started making noise. Obviously they wouldn't recommend this if it was going to cause other issues with the engine. I do not think its as big of an issue as some would like to believe.

The only tsb I recall that advised 10w40 was not for the 04-06 F150 or for the cam phaser tick. It was for a ticking noise during tip-in accel and it was for either 08 or 09 3 valves in F150's and mustangs. It has been long since removed from the FMC dealer website as well.
 
Originally Posted By: dave1251
So I retorted your

Originally Posted By: Rocko1
Without talking minute specs, if you feel running anything other than 5w20 is detrimental to the 5.4l 3v you are saying all non-US motors with exact same parts are being damaged becuase Ford is calling for 5w30 on these motors?

with

Because 5w30 shears into a 20 grade the majority of the time. 20 grade oils have been used in a variety of applications for many years. It was unless you tested used oil you never knew. Now people are coming out of the woodwork 5W20=bad.

Then you changed your argument to 10w30 when was that a recommend viscosity for Ford Modular?. If this was the recommend grade in 1991 I would prefer the "protection" of a modern 5W-20 over a 10w30 from 1991.


My mistake, the 10w30 was meant to be 5w30. That wasn't an attempt to change my argument, it was a typo.

And if a car or truck is designed and needs a specific oil weight does i make sense to simply substitute that oil with another weight because it's not prevalent in that area? No.

I never said 5w20 was bad. The whole argument is finding out the real reason Ford calls for it and why it back spec'd it on most of it's motors. I don't feel it was simply in the best interest of the motors longevity. Again, many people claim the modular motors tolerances changed and they NEED 5w20-not true. Long time trusted Ford employees are discredited when they recite conversations with Ford engineers simply becuase it doesn't fit their argument. People with a great deal of knowledge on motors and specifically the modular 5.4's and 4.6's are also discredited again because they may go against the label on the oil cap and whats in the manual.
 
Alright my biggest complaint is that CAFE=less engine protection. You are correct the motors were not revised and clearances were not changed to use 5W20's like I stated 20 grade oils have been used for many years.

"And if a car or truck is designed and needs a specific oil weight does i make sense to simply substitute that oil with another weight because it's not prevalent in that area? No."

Well I do not know a single motor that has to run on a specific viscosity or it will explode. Oil is dynamic as the temperatures in your engine changes so does the viscosity. If you have seen my arguments with posters that state you have to use 0W-40 synthetic because the motor has a European car model symbol on it, I will make suggestions on what the poster has in his/her area and will match a substitute that although is not ideal match to a 0W-40 oil I will show them the data on what has similar HTHS performance that the engine required while under warranty, with the caveat the cold flowing performance will be compromised. So often you use what you can obtain. I do not imagine 5W20 is readily available in the areas that you mentioned that different grades of oil are recommended for Ford vehicles. Just because a country is a 1st world nation does not mean the country has the access to resources that us in the U.S. and because of being our neighbors Canada has. Now imagine a Mustang being sold in a county that is not particularly wealthy what do you believe will be recommended to used there. So the whole 5W20 is not recommended in Timbuktu does not have too much merit also because often 5W20 is not readily available.
 
I had a conversation with an engineer about using a heavier weight of oil to mask the phaser noise in the older trucks. I cannot remember the exact details but he told me that the engines do have tight tolerances but that 5w30 or 10w30 should be no problem at all. He said on the coldest days of winter(here in Missouri) 15w40 MIGHT be an issue. He said that he couldn't guarantee whether it would or would not cause damage at cold start but he would not want to risk it. Wish I could remember more and would have had more time to talk with him seemed like a very knowledgeable guy.
 
Originally Posted By: dave1251
Alright my biggest complaint is that CAFE=less engine protection. You are correct the motors were not revised and clearances were not changed to use 5W20's like I stated 20 grade oils have been used for many years.

"And if a car or truck is designed and needs a specific oil weight does i make sense to simply substitute that oil with another weight because it's not prevalent in that area? No."

Well I do not know a single motor that has to run on a specific viscosity or it will explode. Oil is dynamic as the temperatures in your engine changes so does the viscosity. If you have seen my arguments with posters that state you have to use 0W-40 synthetic because the motor has a European car model symbol on it, I will make suggestions on what the poster has in his/her area and will match a substitute that although is not ideal match to a 0W-40 oil I will show them the data on what has similar HTHS performance that the engine required while under warranty, with the caveat the cold flowing performance will be compromised. So often you use what you can obtain. I do not imagine 5W20 is readily available in the areas that you mentioned that different grades of oil are recommended for Ford vehicles. Just because a country is a 1st world nation does not mean the country has the access to resources that us in the U.S. and because of being our neighbors Canada has. Now imagine a Mustang being sold in a county that is not particularly wealthy what do you believe will be recommended to used there. So the whole 5W20 is not recommended in Timbuktu does not have too much merit also because often 5W20 is not readily available.


I agree with almost all of what you said. I think my goal as many of the other members who own 5.4l 3v want to know simply what is the absolute best oil viscosity for the engines longevity. This question may never be answered.

From what I have read, heard and seen, I don't believe Ford changed to 5w20 so it could extend the life of the modular motors to the absolute maximum limits. I don't believe they have any monetary or other interest in doing this. The mpg savings on the 5w20 are miniscule as it relates to each person but of course more substantial when you talk about the fleet of 5.4s currently driving. I feel simple the CAFE and emissions reduction was their sole motivating factor behind the 5w20 change.

Again, will the 5w20 take the 04' and newer 5.4l motors to the 150K, 200K, 250K mile mark and beyond? I am not sure. Just from the thousands of posts I have read, I have seen many more 200K+ mile vehicles mentioned that were serviced with 10w30 or 5w30 than I have seen with 5w20. I don't recall any that have made it past the 175K mark that have been serviced with 5w20. Again, that means next to nothing to anyone else and is of course no proof at all that 5w20 is any less capable of maintaining a motor to great lengths, but it does make me wonder.
 
5w20 was designed and specified for CAFE purposes. It was back specified to older designs to ensure a significant enough volume of engines and applications would use it to satisy the EPA's concerns about usage and availibility. There were even letters to that affect between the EPA and Ford at the time. By doing so, the CAFE issue was met as far as the EPA is concerned.

Reality at the time most of this happened was that it was normal for 5w30 oil to shear into 5w20 land during a typical oil change, and engines generally held up fine with that situation. The advent of more shear stable oils and a demand for them meant that 5w20 was a viable grade.

Our work fleet has over a dozen 3V's pushing 225,000 miles at the moment on 5w20.

Given that that average vehicle sees 12,000 miles a year, it is entirely possible that the bulk of the vehicles with engines you are concerned about simply haven't driven that many miles yet. After all, the 3V 5.4 made its arrival in '04 body style F150s that came out in 2003. At average mileage, these units would be at 108,000 miles now. Not shocking to not see the bulk of them at high milage yet.
 
Originally Posted By: MNgopher
5w20 was designed and specified for CAFE purposes. It was back specified to older designs to ensure a significant enough volume of engines and applications would use it to satisy the EPA's concerns about usage and availibility. There were even letters to that affect between the EPA and Ford at the time. By doing so, the CAFE issue was met as far as the EPA is concerned.

Reality at the time most of this happened was that it was normal for 5w30 oil to shear into 5w20 land during a typical oil change, and engines generally held up fine with that situation. The advent of more shear stable oils and a demand for them meant that 5w20 was a viable grade.

Our work fleet has over a dozen 3V's pushing 225,000 miles at the moment on 5w20.

Given that that average vehicle sees 12,000 miles a year, it is entirely possible that the bulk of the vehicles with engines you are concerned about simply haven't driven that many miles yet. After all, the 3V 5.4 made its arrival in '04 body style F150s that came out in 2003. At average mileage, these units would be at 108,000 miles now. Not shocking to not see the bulk of them at high milage yet.



Is the 5w30 shearing issue still applicable today? Did that apply to dino's or synthetics also?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom