Originally Posted By: jsharp
But the complete item is US manufactured. That's not playing with statistics. That's how manufacturing works. You take raw materials and parts and often software and assemble them in such a manner that you add value. That's how a few bucks worth of wood and varnish become an expensive piece of furniture. That's how the company I work for takes $100 worth of parts and assemblies and when it's complete we have a $1000 or $2000 product.
Usually the "manufacturing" value is the value added (sales - parts/purchase from others). And yes, everything in the world if you look deep enough has its value from 1) profit of someone + 2) labor cost of someone (which is a profit of someone) + 3) energy cost of someone (which is also a profit of someone).
So yes, the $200 CPU you buy is only worth $1 of silicon + $30 of energy + $20 of labor (variable cost) + $49 of R&D + $50 of energy + $50 of profit. This also go for your boeing 747 and $20 Walmart toaster. This is also why when a company move its production to China they are only reducing their price by 10%, but their labor cost reduces by 50%. Labor isn't everything, there's a lot of cost in retailing and marketing, as well as transportation, overhead, increased lead time (cash flow cost), and (Surprise!!!) risk.
Even when something is made in China or Malaysia, a lot of its components are still from Japan, US, Taiwan, etc and a lot of the cost is still sent back to those places. When you buy a $200 made in Malaysia CPU it is probably 70% back in the US and only 10% in Malaysia, and 20% to Japan and Europe.
A smart phone selling for $500 may only cost $250 to make, with the BOM (bill of material) to be about $200 and labor to be $50. The $50 labor paid to Foxcon usually means foxcon is keeping 6-10% (going rate in the industry) when 90-94% is paid to the Chinese labor + Taiwanese / American / Singaporean / Japanese engineering.