DUI checkpoint

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Cujet
Originally Posted By: hpb


Wait, you were detained for several hours? On what grounds? Things are obviously VERY different in your neck of the woods, the police here cannot and would not hold anyone that long at a simple traffic stop. Unless there's more to the story that you haven't disclosed, for example a drug dog had a strong reaction on your car?


No issues with the cops. They behaved well while they searched through my truck, my cooler, my food and my belongings. Being from Florida, and traveling in Vermont may have created a need for additional scrutiny. Still, there were no issues between me and the cops.

The issue was that I had to wait and wait and wait for my turn at the checkpoint. It was located at the bottom of a hill, just prior to an intersection. On Route 7, which is a major thoroughfare, much of the road has a high speed limit and always has plenty of traffic. Initially, I had no idea it was a checkpoint and no idea how long the backup was.

I'm still annoyed about it.


Police also think that a car from Florida, all the way up there, MUST be trafficking illegal firearms.
 
Originally Posted By: MalfunctionProne

Police also think that a car from Florida, all the way up there, MUST be trafficking illegal firearms.


Truck from Florida. F150 SuperCrew Egoboost, with wife, dog and tons of supplies.

My firearms are all 100% legal, always. Vermont has reasonable firearms laws too! Non felon residents of other states may carry in Vermont, whether or not they are licensed.
 
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
I will venture to say that distracted driving is nothing new. When I was in high school it was putting on makeup, driving with kids on laps, messing with the old manual radio tuning knobs, looking at your passenger and gesticulating while chatting, etc. It certainly is more prevalent now, but the state of "cranium in rectal storage" has been around as long as humans.

The fact that I see - DAILY - people driving for miles with turn signals on says it all. I'm not talking one every now and then. I'm talking multiple drivers, DAILY. Humanity has no bright future.


The new trend of idiots I'm seeing are people driving down the freeway with NO lights on at night...and I'm not talking about when it's just starting to get dark, I'm talking about when it's been dark and is completely dark...this one idiot last week had everybody flashing their lights at him and he still wasn't getting the message...how dense are people these days with driver's licenses? I guess all vehicles need to be made stupid proof and have the lights come on automatically...
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
I will venture to say that distracted driving is nothing new. When I was in high school it was putting on makeup, driving with kids on laps, messing with the old manual radio tuning knobs, looking at your passenger and gesticulating while chatting, etc. It certainly is more prevalent now, but the state of "cranium in rectal storage" has been around as long as humans.

The fact that I see - DAILY - people driving for miles with turn signals on says it all. I'm not talking one every now and then. I'm talking multiple drivers, DAILY. Humanity has no bright future.


The new trend of idiots I'm seeing are people driving down the freeway with NO lights on at night...and I'm not talking about when it's just starting to get dark, I'm talking about when it's been dark and is completely dark...this one idiot last week had everybody flashing their lights at him and he still wasn't getting the message...how dense are people these days with driver's licenses? I guess all vehicles need to be made stupid proof and have the lights come on automatically...


It's usually some fool driving with his daytime running lights on at night. No taillights.

A lot of the newer cars light up the instrument cluster when you turn the ignition on. So a less experienced driver doesn't really know. Headlights are on (sort-of) and the instrument cluster is lit up so his/her lights must be on.

That was one of the things that bugged me about center mounted instrument clusters (Toyota Echo/Saturn Ion/etc...) I glance down at night to check the gauges and it's nothing but darkness there. So I instinctively grab the headlight switch and try to turn the headlights on except they are already on.
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
The new trend of idiots I'm seeing are people driving down the freeway with NO lights on at night..


I've been seeing this, too, just not as much as the turn signal thing. Until you take control completely away from the "driver" (sarcasm again) you can't idiot proof anything. I'm not going off on a tangent about automated cars and roadways. I'm just saying that the roads continue to get more congested, cars continue to further coddle drivers, life continues to have more things requiring attention (intentional or not), and tasks like driving suffer. Most were probably NEVER very good at it. There were just fewer of us on the road at the same time so we didn't notice as much.
 
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
You can't drink responsibly and drive right after. Sorry, can't be done.

Again if you drink and then drive I find that wrong and IMO the person should face stiff consequences if caught.


There is such a thing as responsible drinking and driving, and legal BAC limits are set at levels to account for this. To suggest a 0.000% BAC limit is as unnecessary and unenforceable as prohibition was.

Tom


If you drink and then drive it is irresponsible IMO period. The only reason these limits are set is because so many people drink they really have to plus lawmakers aren't going to pass laws that would get them in trouble. A truly responsible person would not drink and then get behind the wheel. I don't care if it is 1 beer or 1 glass of wine. With alcohol in your system you should not drive. If you disagree fine. This is my view.
 
Originally Posted By: javacontour
Do you understand how this works? I weigh 225# I can drink one beer/hour and my body will metabolize the alcohol nearly as fast as I drink it. It would take 75 hours of drinking at that pace to hit the legal limit.

If I drank 1/hour for 24 hours, my projected BAC would be 0.024% or less than 1/3 of the legal limit in the US and still less than Shannow's legal limit of 0.05%

The adult male who has two drinks over a two hour restaurant visit, or three beers during a three hour tip to the baseball game is likely not anywhere close to impared.

The typical adult male can metabolize one drink/hour. A good rule of thumb for women is 1/2 that. A 115# woman will hit 0.045 BAC after two glasses of wine during that two hour dinner. Her date, 0.002 BAC if he's a 225# male.

Now if you are going to a beer pong tournament, don't drive, get a driver, etc. But if you can pace yourself to one drink/hour as a man and 1/2 a drink/hour as a woman, you are not likely a danger to society behind the wheel.

If you can't monitor, pace or control your consumption, then I agree, make arrangements to stay the night, take a cab, arrange a DD. But if that's a recurrent theme in your life, perhaps you should give up alcohol totally. If you find you are repeatedly in situations where you are not safe to drive, then you may have a problem with alcohol.

Like everything else, YMMV.

Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI

I have zero tolerance for anyone who takes even one drink and then drives. No excuse for it. If you will get behind the wheel leave the booze alone and that includes just 1 glass of wine at diner. Again, no excuse for it.


So you are suggesting we all have to drink only at home? And if we have guests over we should not serve any alcohol? And we should have to walk to bars and restaurants? Moderate drinking is a perfectly normal social behavior, has been for thousands of years, and provides great enhancement to life, not to mention health. The problem is drinking too much.

According to the online blood alcohol calculators, a man my size can enjoy two glasses of wine over a one and a half hour dinner out and my blood alcohol level would be only 0.17%, less than 1/4th the legal DWI limit, and less than half the "impaired" level. This does not make me dangerous on the road, in fact I can argue I drive better when a bit relaxed. I have been enjoying a couple of glasses of wine with dinner virtually every night for over 40 years and never had an accident or even a ticket after drinking.

The important question in my mind is whether government authorities have the right to stop and search ordinary citizens without any probable cause whatsoever. The catch-all excuse of "for the public safety" is far too broad and vague to justify violating our rights under the forth amendment, and can be used to rationalize just about any such intrusive activity.

Tom NJ


No, I am suggesting if you are going to drink do not get behind the wheel and drive after. If that means drinking at home fine. It can also mean a designated driver. If you want to drink then drink. I pass no judgment and never said people can't drink who wish to. Just do it responsibly. You can't drink responsibly and drive right after. Sorry, can't be done.

There haven't been automobiles for thousands of years so your using that to justify it as you did doesn't work. I could care less if someone gets drunk and jumps on their horse. Getting drunk( or just drinking "moderately" as you put it )and then getting behind the wheel of a car though is a whole different thing.

Again if you drink and then drive I find that wrong and IMO the person should face stiff consequences if caught. I didn't say if you drink it is wrong though. Lots of ways to enjoy your alcoholic beverages and not drive.


Yes, I know there are formulas to determine when a person should be influenced by the amount of alcohol consumed. They are not 100% accurate though. Some people are knocked for a loop by just 1 beer or glass of wine while others could drain a keg and be fine. The effects don't always coincide with a person's size either. One small drink for me and I am gone for a couple hours and I am near 2X's your weight. Alcohol content in the drink matters too. Some beers/wine/hard liquors are stronger than others. Do you expect people to figure in the alcohol content as well when they are monitoring their intake and pacing themselves(
laugh.gif
)?

Your mathematical formulas don't invalidate my point/opinion.

You yourself use words like typical, projected, pace yourself, etc... So it is not bullet proof science and it relies on self control as well. That is just what I want, a person drinking being asked to control and monitor their intake. That is as nuts as them driving.

I am sorry but IMO if you will drive after drinking any alcoholic beverage you are irresponsible. Just lay off the hooch. It isn't hard unless you are an alcoholic. No one will die if you skip a beer at the game or skip that wine or cocktail with dinner. Have those drinks though, and then drive, and someone "could" die or be seriously injured.

Try and defend driving after drinking all you wish. You can speak of moderation, self control, this or that formula, etc... Doesn't mean a thing. Just the drinking man's excuse to drink and then drive.

I really think opinions like yours are so common because so many people drink. They don't want to give it up/limit it for any reason at any time so they come up with reasons to justify it that others who drink will fall for. To me these arguments are just excuses. Others have the right to disagree. I just hope I am not on the road with them after dinner or a game.
grin.gif
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
The effects don't always coincide with a person's size either. One small drink for me and I am gone for a couple hours and I am near 2X's your weight.


If you weigh around 400 lbs and are wiped out for a couple of hours by one small drink, you must have a rare sensitivity or allergy to alcohol, which explains your opinion on drinking. The rest of us, however, are not affected by one small drink and can drive very well. Indeed I drive superbly after three drinks consumed over a 1.5 hour dinner.

Responsible people know their limit and monitor their drinking carefully, taking into account the size and strength of their drinks as well as time and eating. For the vast majority, one drink has no negative effects, and we are not being irresponsible by enjoying a drink or two with dinner and driving home.

Apparently you are a rare exception and I agree you should not drive after even a single drink, but that does not apply to me or most others.

11.gif


Tom NJ
 
Well when one man's opinions go against the law on the books, I'll take my chances with following the law. Had a beer at happy hour last night and survived! The horror!
 
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
The effects don't always coincide with a person's size either. One small drink for me and I am gone for a couple hours and I am near 2X's your weight.


If you weigh around 400 lbs and are wiped out for a couple of hours by one small drink, you must have a rare sensitivity or allergy to alcohol, which explains your opinion on drinking. The rest of us, however, are not affected by one small drink and can drive very well. Indeed I drive superbly after three drinks consumed over a 1.5 hour dinner.

Responsible people know their limit and monitor their drinking carefully, taking into account the size and strength of their drinks as well as time and eating. For the vast majority, one drink has no negative effects, and we are not being irresponsible by enjoying a drink or two with dinner and driving home.

Apparently you are a rare exception and I agree you should not drive after even a single drink, but that does not apply to me or most others.

11.gif


Tom NJ



Thank you Tom NJ for a voice of reason here.
 
Last edited:
I think now, with all the controversy in our little microcosm, I understand why many do not object to the checkpoints. They may not violate the Constitution, but if you consider the ability to move freely about the country a right, it is being violated. If a vehicle search occurs as a result I DO think it represents lack of probable cause.

Sorry, but I will continue to object.
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: DBMaster
I will venture to say that distracted driving is nothing new. When I was in high school it was putting on makeup, driving with kids on laps, messing with the old manual radio tuning knobs, looking at your passenger and gesticulating while chatting, etc. It certainly is more prevalent now, but the state of "cranium in rectal storage" has been around as long as humans.

The fact that I see - DAILY - people driving for miles with turn signals on says it all. I'm not talking one every now and then. I'm talking multiple drivers, DAILY. Humanity has no bright future.


The new trend of idiots I'm seeing are people driving down the freeway with NO lights on at night...and I'm not talking about when it's just starting to get dark, I'm talking about when it's been dark and is completely dark...this one idiot last week had everybody flashing their lights at him and he still wasn't getting the message...how dense are people these days with driver's licenses? I guess all vehicles need to be made stupid proof and have the lights come on automatically...

I've been saying for years, it's not a cell phone issue or distracted driving issue. It's a bad driver issue. The only way to make our roads safer is to increase the standards for getting a license, and increasing awareness for those that already have them. Make mistakes while driving more costly, like losing your license for a few months for multiple accidents. Instead of making the vehicles stupid proof, we should work on getting stupid people off of the road.
 
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
Indeed I drive superbly after three drinks consumed over a 1.5 hour dinner.

That's what they all say. I would love to know your standard. The facts are that your reaction will be slower. Thats just proven fact.

I'm done.
smile.gif
 
I just heard that a new Minnesota law takes effect Jan 1 to add hours to driver training/education. Maybe a start to try and deal more with all of the 'issues' that come under the heading of 'poor driving'.
 
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
So...are you then, in favor of a return to alcohol prohibition?


See, this is the kind of overstatement, overreaction, and just downright foolishness that ruins so many threads on this site. At NO point in this thread did I talk about not allowing people to drink. Since when does someone saying don't drink then drive mean don't drink period? I even specifically said I am not against people having a drink. It is my opinion that if they do they should not drive after( not until long after any possible effects have passed ).

I NEVER said return to prohibition. Good lord.
mad.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
Originally Posted By: NHHEMI
The effects don't always coincide with a person's size either. One small drink for me and I am gone for a couple hours and I am near 2X's your weight.


If you weigh around 400 lbs and are wiped out for a couple of hours by one small drink, you must have a rare sensitivity or allergy to alcohol, which explains your opinion on drinking. The rest of us, however, are not affected by one small drink and can drive very well. Indeed I drive superbly after three drinks consumed over a 1.5 hour dinner.

Responsible people know their limit and monitor their drinking carefully, taking into account the size and strength of their drinks as well as time and eating. For the vast majority, one drink has no negative effects, and we are not being irresponsible by enjoying a drink or two with dinner and driving home.

Apparently you are a rare exception and I agree you should not drive after even a single drink, but that does not apply to me or most others.

11.gif


Tom NJ


Again, this is all opinions and you are certainly entitled to yours. Your opinions actually match up with the law more so than mine do as well, but again, I think the laws have questionable reasons for being written as they are. I digress though...

I have seen people get in accidents however who "only had one drink" and alcohol was a determining factor. That excuse does not fly with me. It is also proven by scientific studies( please spare me the infamous BITOG request for proof and links - they exist and we all know it - I saw videos of the studies at the local PD )that for the vast majority of people who take a drink that they are far more impaired than they think they are. You may think you can have that drink or 2 and then drive but your reaction time and cognitive processes are impaired to some degree( again how much so varies from person to person and also impacted by alcohol content ).

I am not a drinker and I freely admit it. Can't stand most of it to be honest. Tastes awful to me! There are a couple things I will drink to be sociable at certain times but that is it. With that said I would NEVER, and I repeat NEVER, get behind the wheel of a vehicle after having even one small drink( even if it didn't effect me as it does ). Not until quite a few hours had passed and I was certain the effects were done. THAT is being responsible.

I just do not believe anyone should drive who just had a drink. Not even if it is just 1 beer or glass of wine. If you are going to drink plan for a DD or to do it where you do not have to drive after. I really don't see that as being an overly harsh or prudish view? I am not saying people can't drink who wish to. I am simply saying if you do, even just a little, stay out from behind the wheel of a car for a while. Is that really so much to ask and so unreasonable?

At the risk of antagonizing you and the booze crew( j/k )further I completely agree that driving after 3 drinks over a 1.5 hour dinner is a wise move. I bet you might just blow over the legal limit depending on how soon in the 1.5 hours you had the 3. I also would wager you are impaired to at least some degree but just don't realize it( and that right there is a big part of why I am against it ).

Anyway, this is just my view on the subject. Have seen the results of drunk drivers through the PD and have lost a family friend to a person who "only had a couple" when he ran my Dad's friend( one of his co-workers kids )down as he was fixing a flat. Very few people actually drink in moderation before driving as they claim and very few if any are as unaffected by the drinks as they claim and think.

I just do not approve of driving after drinking. That's me on the subject.

Have a Merry Christmas and a SAFE New Year.

13.gif
< this is what you should drink when you will drive
crackmeup2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Al
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
Indeed I drive superbly after three drinks consumed over a 1.5 hour dinner.

That's what they all say. I would love to know your standard. The facts are that your reaction will be slower. Thats just proven fact.


And facts are that teenagers have better reaction time than most adults. Who gets into more accidents?

I'd happily ride with Tom and his drinks vs a sober teen any day.
 
Originally Posted By: surfstar
Originally Posted By: Al
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
Indeed I drive superbly after three drinks consumed over a 1.5 hour dinner.

That's what they all say. I would love to know your standard. The facts are that your reaction will be slower. Thats just proven fact.


And facts are that teenagers have better reaction time than most adults. Who gets into more accidents?

I'd happily ride with Tom and his drinks vs a sober teen any day.


Hmmm??? Ride with a sober teenager or with someone who just had 3 drinks with his dinner? Do I have another option because neither of those sounds like something I really want to do. If push comes to shove though I will choose a licensed sober driver any day regardless of age.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Al
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
Indeed I drive superbly after three drinks consumed over a 1.5 hour dinner.

That's what they all say. I would love to know your standard. The facts are that your reaction will be slower. Thats just proven fact.

I'm done.
smile.gif



If he's 180+lbs, he is at .04 (or less) after 90 minutes & three drinks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom