So here's the plan...
My girlfriend's '94 Caprice 9C1 has approximately 140k on it. Transmission has recently started slipping in first, giving a harsh shift to second, slipping at 35-45 cruise speeds, and running hot. (!)
I know the reputation of the 4l60E - I've got three of them in the family. As a matter of fact, I just had to go to a "built" tranny in my '95 SS due to some major failures.
I'll start by saying that I'm highly skeptical - in my opinion there's nothing that a chemical additive can do to repair the symptoms of this transmission. This is not the fault of ARX, I simply don't think that it can repair failing mechanical parts.
I'm planning on doing the Auto-RX treatment to the LT1's in my "fleet" and figured I'd give it a shot in the failing transmission as a last ditch effort sort of thing. If this cures the issue, I'll be the single biggest advertisement for ARX that's ever been seen on this board or others.
So the intent is to use this thread as a log - again it bears repeating that I am NOT expressing a lack of faith in ARX to do what it's designed to do. I'm planning on running it in three seperate LT1's in the near future and will be glad to share my findings. I anticipate crisper throttle response and a whole ton of sludge from at least two of the cars considering their history as fleet vehicles. I wanted to use this thread as a log and documentation in the event that ARX actually does perform a miracle and bandaid this failing transmission for another 10k miles or so, until the money is put aside for another heavy-duty build. After spending $1800-ish out the door for a built trans and high-stall 9.5" converter in my '95, the cash isn't there right now for another HD build for the '94, which would recieve a junkyard tranny until money is there for something long term.
That my story, now to apply the ARX!
My girlfriend's '94 Caprice 9C1 has approximately 140k on it. Transmission has recently started slipping in first, giving a harsh shift to second, slipping at 35-45 cruise speeds, and running hot. (!)
I know the reputation of the 4l60E - I've got three of them in the family. As a matter of fact, I just had to go to a "built" tranny in my '95 SS due to some major failures.
I'll start by saying that I'm highly skeptical - in my opinion there's nothing that a chemical additive can do to repair the symptoms of this transmission. This is not the fault of ARX, I simply don't think that it can repair failing mechanical parts.
I'm planning on doing the Auto-RX treatment to the LT1's in my "fleet" and figured I'd give it a shot in the failing transmission as a last ditch effort sort of thing. If this cures the issue, I'll be the single biggest advertisement for ARX that's ever been seen on this board or others.
So the intent is to use this thread as a log - again it bears repeating that I am NOT expressing a lack of faith in ARX to do what it's designed to do. I'm planning on running it in three seperate LT1's in the near future and will be glad to share my findings. I anticipate crisper throttle response and a whole ton of sludge from at least two of the cars considering their history as fleet vehicles. I wanted to use this thread as a log and documentation in the event that ARX actually does perform a miracle and bandaid this failing transmission for another 10k miles or so, until the money is put aside for another heavy-duty build. After spending $1800-ish out the door for a built trans and high-stall 9.5" converter in my '95, the cash isn't there right now for another HD build for the '94, which would recieve a junkyard tranny until money is there for something long term.
That my story, now to apply the ARX!