Originally Posted By: Or
"
A lot..". Define that. Then put it in the context of the known fallibility of eyewitness testimony. Especially when paid, or to a superior authority, and when decades later.
Did you even watch the documentary? Evidently not.
You can count the number of witnesses (either filmed years ago or interviewed recently about family statements)
for yourself. Then you can maybe offer something intelligent to say instead of blanket accusals of lying.
Specifically, which ones do you think are lying? (Do 1st watch the documentary at least please.)
Originally Posted By: Or
And to question your prior post, what Japanese invasion of the Marshall Islands in 1937? There wasn't one. The Japanese had occupied them since 1914 or 1915
-ish, I
forget which.
You "forget". Why not look it up? Is that so hard for an "historian" you claim to be? October 1914 (no "ish"...), was when the
initial invasion
began, and buildup continued for years. Oh, you say they were just "occupiers". Ask the people who lived there. I met one the other day, and their attitude is they were always brutal violent
invaders who never belonged there.
Originally Posted By: Or
You
gotta work harder than CNN these days...
Its easy to "work harder" than
you, thats for sure.
You can't even look up easy, basic facts. Nor did you even watch the subject of this thread before babbling on about nonsense.