Snagglefoot
Thread starter
The premise of On the Beach was that the US and Russia fought it out but neither bothered to nuke Australia. Spoiler Alert: The radiation finally made it to Australia but it took months.
How’s he going to “deal with the situation at home” if he’s dead?ICBMs and SLBMs have sufficient range to target any place on the Earth when launched from any other place. There is no "safe haven" in a nuclear war. Also Americans would be rather miffed if the President fled to Australia rather than deal with the situation at home.
The 747 is a wonderful airplane from a pilot perspective.The 707 was a fine aircraft. A retired Eastern Airlines pilot once told me, flying it was like driving a large luxury sedan. A pure pleasure according to him.
I haven't seen the movie, but it's said that author Nevil Shute was upset by the liberties the movie took w.r.t. the book.The premise of On the Beach was that the US and Russia fought it out but neither bothered to nuke Australia. Spoiler Alert: The radiation finally made it to Australia but it took months.
I’m surprised they chose the 747 for the next Air Force One but I guess there are still over 400 still flying so maintenance is not an issue.
It's never been refueled. Even in practice, the E-4B is used.How many times did the current AF1’s take fuel in flight … ?
I‘m aware of the doomsday scenario of continuing flight - but don’t know if it carries the same wisdom these days … Seems there were back and forths that folks here would not be aware of …
In the commercial setup - the range of 800i is not that much more …
Anyone know with these vs the current ?
Which was the conclusion at the “grilling” …It's never been refueled. Even in practice, the E-4B is used.
that's the one The OP's Pic is of.Here's a retired Air Force One 707 at the Museum of Flight (near Seattle) in 2007. I wish I'd taken a shot of the tail number.
View attachment 190767
View attachment 190769
View attachment 190770