I've been doing some light reading...Thomas Paine, some Washington/Adams/Jefferson/Lincoln stuff.
Whether I agree with the specifics or not, what strikes me is the level of intellectual effort that these people seemed to put into their writing and speaking. Some of it is pure gold...such a cut above what you read and hear now.
What do you think? It seems sad to me that with all the tools we have for learning now, our discourse is outclassed by people who learned to read from chalky slates. Maybe they just didn't have so many distractions back then.
I think a big part of it is that eloquence and powerful writing are just not valued now. The better you do the more likely you are to lose your audience.
Whether I agree with the specifics or not, what strikes me is the level of intellectual effort that these people seemed to put into their writing and speaking. Some of it is pure gold...such a cut above what you read and hear now.
What do you think? It seems sad to me that with all the tools we have for learning now, our discourse is outclassed by people who learned to read from chalky slates. Maybe they just didn't have so many distractions back then.
I think a big part of it is that eloquence and powerful writing are just not valued now. The better you do the more likely you are to lose your audience.