There's a know-it-all car guy on another forum I'm on... I've called him out countless times on touting his opinion as fact in the past on subjects that I'm familiar enough with to discuss intelligibly.
But in this case this guy is talking about oil change intervals and saying things that don't match at all what I've generally heard from those who know what they're talking about.
I'll just quote exactly what he's said...:
(this is his response when somebody said that the 3000 mile intervals were created by the quick lube shops to generate more revenue)
(now he continues when he was told that a 3000 mile oil change may be 'safe' but was not factually 'necessary' to prevent excessive wear)
Now of course I understand certain engines you'd rather be safe than sorry - such as the Toyota 3.0/3.3... but that's the exception, not the norm.
So what is your guy's take on this? I'm not asking you to agree with me or agree with him - I'm asking for your honest opinion, if not some oil tests to back your opinion up demonstrating under what conditions a 3000 mile oil change would go from "well, if it makes you feel better" to "that's probably a good idea"?
But in this case this guy is talking about oil change intervals and saying things that don't match at all what I've generally heard from those who know what they're talking about.
I'll just quote exactly what he's said...:
(this is his response when somebody said that the 3000 mile intervals were created by the quick lube shops to generate more revenue)
Quote:
It is NOT a ploy of quick-lube shops....that is a myth. Even Consumer Reports, so well-versed on most auto issues, has let themselves be duped to some extent with this. 5000 miles, regardless of what is in the Owners' Manual, is OK of you are driving long distances, at moderate temperatures, on uncongested roads, with little traffic, or using synthctic oil, but it is clearly TOO LONG when you deal with the conditions many of us do today with endless stop-and-go traffic, regular petroleum oil, and short trips. 3 months/ 3000 miles is best under those conditions....you can go to maybe 4 months if you don't have the 3000 miles yet after 3 months.
My oil gets changed every 3-4 months with a factory filter and Castrol dino oil...either by myself in the driveway or in the dealer service bay, depending if I have the time...and I have never had any engine oil-related problems.
(now he continues when he was told that a 3000 mile oil change may be 'safe' but was not factually 'necessary' to prevent excessive wear)
Quote:
even if the oil itself does not suffer viscosity breakdown ( as dino oil does at high temperatures ) the additives and detergents wear out. Those oil additives perform a number of important functions besides just general oil lubrication and heat absorbtion.......cleansing of deposits, anti-scuff action, evaporation of moisture, suspension of engine-metal-wear shave particles, etc......
But....for MOST of the type of driving we do today in urban and suburban areas, 3 months / 3000 miles is generally best. That is a fact, not an opinion. Today's endless stop-and-go driving is murder on engine oil, even with the good quality oil we have today ( SM grade, now ). And in fact, many automakers agree. For " severe service " intervals, which is what most of us actually encounter today, they recommend about half of the standard 7500 mile interval......3000-4000 miles, which is pretty much what I said.
Several automakers have tried out on-board computers that " monitor " oil condition based on number of cold starts, short trips, starts/stops, engine load, etc.....and signal for an oil change after a certain number of them, but experience with these devices has shown that the engines don't stay as clean as they do with standard 3/3000 changes. BMW, for example, has had more warranty work and engine replacements with these oil monitor devices than they did the old-fashioned way with regular oil changes every few months.
So......CAN you stretch oil changes? Sure you can. Will the engine suffer? In many, if not most, cases, yes. And some engines simply will not put up with it.....they will bite you......as the topic of this whole thread to start with....the Toyota / Lexus 3.0L V6.
Now of course I understand certain engines you'd rather be safe than sorry - such as the Toyota 3.0/3.3... but that's the exception, not the norm.
So what is your guy's take on this? I'm not asking you to agree with me or agree with him - I'm asking for your honest opinion, if not some oil tests to back your opinion up demonstrating under what conditions a 3000 mile oil change would go from "well, if it makes you feel better" to "that's probably a good idea"?