Originally Posted By: Artem
Originally Posted By: FoxS
Originally Posted By: Mystic
We should notice at least some cleaning and if there is none the only thing reasonable people can do is conclude that the cleaner is not effective.
Ok if that is your criteria then you can conclude from Artem, who included the pictures that you insist on, that ARX and Kreen are effective and that ARX cleans 5 times better than Kreen.
He said ARX cleaned about 10% and Kreen 2%.
Btw, by his criteria, that meant they didn't work, but by yours they were "effective".
FoxS, I used that percentage as an example. It is not in any way a fact and certainly doesn't show what really happened during the cleaning attempts.
It was just a demonstration that although ARX didn't clean much, it cleaned off more goo then Kreen did, which is said to be a super strong cleaner. Lets not forget that fact that Kreen went AFTER Auto-RX, which as others have pointed out, has "softened" the goo, thus Kreen should have rinsed that sucker right off! It didn't and in my testing, that's saying something about it's cleaning abilities.
Point taken and I know you were doing an analogy rather than an "example" (if it was an example then I would right in quoting it!)
However, it was a bad idea to do an analogy that said one cleaned 10% and one cleaned 2%. The point being, you're kind of quantifying your results which is not an unreasonable approach, and you were making a comparison.
I'd invite you again to restate those numbers, with 100% being completely cleaned. What percentage cleaning do you think Kreen and ARX did? (You can go below 1% if you like!)
In defense of Kreen, it was probably getting rid of ARX and didn't have any strength left to deal with sludge!