2012 Prius C

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Small, but more than efficient than anything else for the price.

If you plan to keep it for under 150k, it can be a good car.

Just remember that cost of ownership does have the potential to be extremely high considering the hybrid components. This is definitely not a car for a paycheck-to-paycheck individual once the car is out of hybrid warranty.

The battery will need to be replaced at some point. Dealer is about $3500, but rebuilt ones can be acquires and installed for about $2k. This is an expense that should be considered about every 200k in many areas, but at shorter intervals if you live in an extremely hot region (i.e. Arizona).


My non Hybrid Ford is on its second transmission at $3800 a pop. I wouldn't worry too much about what is going to happen at 150k with the battery in the Prius. Repairs costs of batteries will just continue to drop as time goes on. Anyway, don't forget about the great warranty they have.
 
The Prius C look's to be an awesome car for the money. I've yet to test drive one, but I will soon. I'm thinking about getting one sometime this summer for my father, not sure yet, either a 2012 Prius C or 2012 Corolla. The MPG for the Prius is really enticing, especially considering my father drives 100 miles roundtrip everyday.
 
Last edited:
I have at least five customers who have over 200,000 miles on their Prii. None has needed a main battery replacement. They are all still getting pretty good fuel economy, as well. One, a 2005 with 211,000 miles on it, averages 49.5 traveling up the mountain where I live and back down to the Valley.

I'm impressed.
 
i really want to like the prius c. i love the fact that it gets so good gas mileage for so cheap. but there's no manual available and that weird prius dashboard just kills it for me.
 
Originally Posted By: jmsjags
i really want to like the prius c. i love the fact that it gets so good gas mileage for so cheap. but there's no manual available and that weird prius dashboard just kills it for me.


There's not much reason for a manual transmission in a hybrid of that design--it just adds complexity and reduces fuel economy. I'll agree with you on the dash; while not a deal-breaker, it's definitely not my cup of tea.
 
Originally Posted By: JOD

Neither is any car.


Simply put, a conventional car has fewer potential areas of failure.

Originally Posted By: JOD
The battery will need to be replaced at some point.


So will a combustion engine or a transmission. Everything wears out in time. Do you have any evidence to suggest that a battery is more likely to fail by 200K than an engine or a transmission? I'm not saying they never fail, nor am I suggesting that one shouldn't be prepared to pay for an expensive repair--but the Prius seems more reliable than most other cars, and the added complexity of the battery is mitigated by a great reduction in the complexity of the transmission, which is the most common expensive failure point in most cars.

Yes, I am suggesting that the battery is far more likely to fail by 200k. Take a look at the Priuschat maint/troubleshooting section in the last 6 months or so. There definitely appears to be an uptick in the number of battery failures well before 200k. My conversations with my friend in the local Toyota dealer's part dept tells me that battery failures at not uncommon.

Also, the mileage reached by taxicabs is not always a good indicator. These vehicles are generally in urban areas, not in hilly terrain. They are constantly running, they are not subject to a ton of duty cycles over a long period of "father time" like most consumer vehicles are.

Lastly, I would not say the transmission is bulletproof on the Prii. My hybrid independent has this article about them:

http://lusciousgarage.com/blog/gen_2_prius_2004_2009_transmission_failure_p0aa6_p0a92_p0a7a/

Also: http://www.lusciousgarage.com/blog/comments/prius_battery_rebuild_yes_or_no/

Originally Posted By: eljefino
Originally Posted By: The Critic

This is definitely not a car for a paycheck-to-paycheck individual once the car is out of hybrid warranty.


Because you'd be seen in a "poor person's car" and it would rock your self image?
mad.gif


I am not sure what you are trying to get at?

Hybrids are not good cars for people on a budget. Period. Sure, they are generally average to above average in reliability, but there is a very high risk of expensive failures. The risk is real, even if problems are not extremely common.

Originally Posted By: Oldwolf
The batteries and hybrid system have an 8yr/100k warranty. In CA it is 10yr/150k.

Anyway, the batteries now are repairable on a cell by cell basis. So if you do have a problem, which would be rare, and it was not under warranty, it wouldn't cost much to fix the bad cell or two.

I have a Prius Hatchback now that I will keep, and I plan to buy a Priuc C too in the next few months.

They only hold 3.5 qts of oil with a 10k OCI. So oil costs are not to much to worry about imo.


The OP is not eligible for the 10/150k warranty, only the 8/100k in his state.

Also, they hold about 4.3 qt of 0w-20 on a 10k interval. That's how much the 3rd gen holds. 2nd gen holds a bit less, the last one I did took about 3.9 qt, but requires 5W30 at a 5k interval.

The argument that the batteries are repairable by replacing individual cells is misleading. Yes, it is usually one or two cells that fail. However, there are two shortfalls to this: 1) If you replace several cells and not rebalance the entire pack, the life of the remaining cells can/will be seriously shortened. No one knows how long this repair will last. 2) Repairing cells and rebalancing the battery pack is a task that serious backyard hybrid enthusiasts do. This is not something that repair shops will do. Therefore, to give potential owners the false hope that many traction battery problems can be repaired for a small cost is misleading.

Originally Posted By: Oldwolf

My non Hybrid Ford is on its second transmission at $3800 a pop. I wouldn't worry too much about what is going to happen at 150k with the battery in the Prius. Repairs costs of batteries will just continue to drop as time goes on. Anyway, don't forget about the great warranty they have.

The OP is in TX. He does not get the 10/150k warranty, only the 8/100k I believe.

Of course repair costs will continue to drop, and they already have with the introduction of these lower-cost battery rebuilders. However, I have a feeling that they have dropped as much as they will.

Also, that hybrid system warranty has a lot of holes. For instance on the 2nd gens, the inverter water pump was a common, moderately expensive failure item that was not covered under the hybrid system warranty. Then of course Toyota did the right thing and issued a SSC for them.

Originally Posted By: Big O Dave
I have at least five customers who have over 200,000 miles on their Prii. None has needed a main battery replacement. They are all still getting pretty good fuel economy, as well. One, a 2005 with 211,000 miles on it, averages 49.5 traveling up the mountain where I live and back down to the Valley.

I'm impressed.


Well, their days are numbered. 200k is around where they seem to last. Just had a co-worker's family member experience a traction battery failure on their 2005 at about 220k. You should become an authorized dealer for Reinvolt or Battery Boy and you can see this as a potential profit opportunity.
grin.gif


Originally Posted By: Cutehumor
Originally Posted By: johnsmellsalot
How do you know when you need a battery?


when it won't start


When it doesn't start, you need a new $200 12v battery. A traction battery failure will cause a bunch of DTCs and Techstream scan tool to confirm the failure.
 
Last edited:
Again, I am not anti-Prius. I have one myself. However, for anyone who is considering one, I feel it is important they become well-informed of the potential risks that they are taking on. They are generally quite reliable but there are additional failure items that must be planned for.

It is interesting that when they first came out, people were seriously paranoid about battery failures. Then for a few years, the taxicab reports of outstanding longevity gave people the impression that these cars were invincible. But after a few more years, and as these cars got older, the truth seems to be somewhere in the middle: they are definitely not invincible, but are also no where near as bad as the haters claimed.
 
The plural of anecdote is not data.... I'm not sure random posts on an internet message board are necessarily a great indicator of reliability. I'm not sure I agree that there are more points of failure, either: no torque converter and a much less complicated transmission versus the extra hybrid components sounds like a wash


Regardless, what we do know is that according to the available data that are out there , the Prius has been one of the most reliable cars on the market, and one of the least expensive to operate. I've yet to see a car which doesn't haves some internet tales of the occasional expensive repair.
 
Originally Posted By: JOD
The plural of anecdote is not data.... I'm not sure random posts on an internet message board are necessarily a great indicator of reliability. I'm not sure I agree that there are more points of failure, either: no torque converter and a much less complicated transmission versus the extra hybrid components sounds like a wash. Regardless, what we do know is that according to the available data that are out there , the Prius he's been one of the most reliable cars on the market, and one of the least expressive to operate. I've yet to see a car which doesn't haves some internet tales of the occasional expensive repair.

Of course, which is why I am mostly outlining the areas of potential failure. Also, transmissions are still inexpensive compared to inverters, extra water pumps that a conventional car does not have, etc.

Remember, extended warranties for a Prius and other hybrids cost about 30-40% more than other Toyota models. Evidently the actuaries have figured out that the risk is far higher, and those guys are usually pretty smart-- I work with a bunch of them.
wink.gif
 
Excellent post Critic
thumbsup2.gif


I think people have to take off their rose colored glasses and look at hybrids and EVs with a realistic approach. Sure they appear "simpler" than conventional drive trains, but we have very few mechanics that actually know hybrid systems, so even simple looking jobs may still be really expensive.
Also, in electrical and electronics world, price truly means quality and you do get what you pay for. Expect all electronic components that have to withstand rigors of automotive use, to be pricey.


To me Prius C with its excellent fuel economy and low price does appear good on the surface, but it should not be confused with low operating costs over a period of 10-15 years because it's not mature enough to draw any conclusions from. For that, Yaris is a much better value IMO. It is a pretty simple and unchanged drivetrain which is proven to be extremely reliable. It gets very good gas mileage, especially with manual transmission and parts are really cheap.
 
I just test drove one, and it is nice, but the road noise/wind noise, especially at speeds over 70 mph is WAY to much, in fact, you cannot really talk to the rear passengers without raising your voice at 75 MPH. My 2011 Prius had the same problem, but after installing 3 sheets of dynapad under my WeatherTech floor mats the noise was reduced dramatically. Without this mod both prius and prius C are very loud at highway speeds. With dynapad my prius is almost as quiet as a camry...
 
Originally Posted By: The Critic
Remember, extended warranties for a Prius and other hybrids cost about 30-40% more than other Toyota models. Evidently the actuaries have figured out that the risk is far higher, and those guys are usually pretty smart-- I work with a bunch of them.
wink.gif



I would agree those rates probably predict the costs fairly accurately. Just never on an individual car, only a large group.
 
Originally Posted By: The Critic


Remember, extended warranties for a Prius and other hybrids cost about 30-40% more than other Toyota models. Evidently the actuaries have figured out that the risk is far higher, and those guys are usually pretty smart-- I work with a bunch of them.
wink.gif



Then you should probably talk to them, because your conclusion doesn't necessarily match with reality. It *might*, but it might not. Economies of scale has a lot to do with it as well. When you consider that the Prius already has a 8/100 warranty on the hybrid components, I'm willing to bet that the margins are much higher on the Prius warranties which are sold.

Basically, I don't think the warranty costs necessarily means what you think it means.

Originally Posted By: The Critic
Also, transmissions are still inexpensive compared to inverters, extra water pumps that a conventional car does not have, etc.



Any idea on the replacement cost of a CVT or a 6 speed auto, many of which aren't even serviced by dealers (replacement only).
 
Originally Posted By: KrisZ

To me Prius C with its excellent fuel economy and low price does appear good on the surface, but it should not be confused with low operating costs over a period of 10-15 years because it's not mature enough to draw any conclusions from.


The technology in the Prius C seems pretty mature to me, unless it's somehow radically different than the regular Prius?

Originally Posted By: KrisZ
For that, Yaris is a much better value IMO. It is a pretty simple and unchanged drivetrain which is proven to be extremely reliable. It gets very good gas mileage, especially with manual transmission and parts are really cheap.


I guess it depends ultimately on how much you drive, but having looked at the real world mpg on Fuelly, the Yaris doesn't really seem that great in the fuel economy department considering its size. Obviously, the less you drive, the harder it is to offset the higher initial purchase price.
 
Originally Posted By: JOD
The plural of anecdote is not data.... I'm not sure random posts on an internet message board are necessarily a great indicator of reliability. I'm not sure I agree that there are more points of failure, either: no torque converter and a much less complicated transmission versus the extra hybrid components sounds like a wash
...


But it's still a CVT.
21.gif


I'm trying real hard to like the PriusC. It's a five-door, gets really great mpg, other Prius models have a mostly favorable service record, and it appeals to me visually. But there's still Toyota numb steering, (which I think they do on purpose to isolate the driver for a more "luxurious" feel and to slow down the driver's ability for "safety".) soft body roll inducing suspension (I haven't even driven one but I'm fairly certain that it will fall short against a Sonic, Fit, or Mazda2 on a twisty road) and the Spectre of Unintended Acceleration Past.

Then there's the CVT. If I want a CVT, I'll get a Suzuki. And I don't mean an SX4 or Kizashi. I mean Burgman 400. It's about 1/3rd the price of the PriusC, many owners average 60mpg, it's suprisingly fun in spite of being CVT driven.

I'm still trying hard to like the Prius C but at the end of the day, I'll take a base Kia Rio and a Burgman. Little more insurance premium/lot more fun.
 
Originally Posted By: JOD

The technology in the Prius C seems pretty mature to me, unless it's somehow radically different than the regular Prius?


Prius is hardly proven. The first gen Prius simply did not sell in large enough numbers to see any problems with the battery or other hybrid components. Plus Toyota provided enough "warranties" to cover any blips in that picture. The second and third gens are finally selling in considerable numbers and are accumulating miles, and as Critic points out, the view is not as rosy as initially thought.
Now, I'm not saying that Prius is not reliable, after all even 150k miles out of the battery is pretty impressive for the first owner at least, but this is the battery alone, we have other hybrid components that may fail and be costly or even not possible to repair outside of dealer floor. Also, once people realize that batteries need replacing at say 150k or 200k miles, guess what's going to happen to all those used hybrids? They will be worthless. They will be like a used cell phone or a cordless drill where the battery replacement will cost more than the item they go in.

Welcome to a truly disposable car era.

Originally Posted By: JOD

I guess it depends ultimately on how much you drive, but having looked at the real world mpg on Fuelly, the Yaris doesn't really seem that great in the fuel economy department considering its size. Obviously, the less you drive, the harder it is to offset the higher initial purchase price.



But this is what I'm trying to get at, fuel cost alone is not everything over the long haul, especially when you buy an econobox, which by definition should have decent fuel economy and be cheap and easy to repair. Prius C fails in two of those three categories when compared to Yaris.
I'm talking about the type of owners that don't trade in the car at first sign of trouble. Coincidently there is a thread about just that, people keeping and fixing their old cars because it saves them money and makes sense financially over the long run, even though the car might be less fuel efficient. From that perspective I just don't see how a hybrid can provide savings when you don't know the cost of fixing hybrid related components and you DO know that the battery will need replacing at one point.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Spazdog


But it's still a CVT.
21.gif


I'm trying real hard to like the PriusC. It's a five-door, gets really great mpg, other Prius models have a mostly favorable service record, and it appeals to me visually. But there's still Toyota numb steering, (which I think they do on purpose to isolate the driver for a more "luxurious" feel and to slow down the driver's ability for "safety".) soft body roll inducing suspension (I haven't even driven one but I'm fairly certain that it will fall short against a Sonic, Fit, or Mazda2 on a twisty road) and the Spectre of Unintended Acceleration Past.

Then there's the CVT. If I want a CVT, I'll get a Suzuki. And I don't mean an SX4 or Kizashi. I mean Burgman 400. It's about 1/3rd the price of the PriusC, many owners average 60mpg, it's suprisingly fun in spite of being CVT driven.

I'm still trying hard to like the Prius C but at the end of the day, I'll take a base Kia Rio and a Burgman. Little more insurance premium/lot more fun.


Prius' CVT is not the belt / pulley or angled disc type CVT that can slip and die. Prius' CVT is a permanent planetary gear set with 2 electric motors and 1 engine, using 2 electric motors to adjust the ratio in between. The only thing that can wear is the gear itself, and durability should be similar to a differential (or better) unless the electric motors die (which is very rare as they are not wear items).

I'd be scared of Nissan's belt / pulley type of CVT. As soon as they slip, it is over.
 
Hyundai solved the "battery replacement" problem in their hybrid. All new sonata hybrid batteries have lifetime replacement. gotta love how Hyundai addressed that. now if only their hybrids got over 50 mpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom