Okay, if he tested in the order that the oils are listed, Mobil1 may have been affected by the previous oil and therefore, showing higher oxidation than it should have.
Now, oxidation vs wear metals. If you look at what is right in front of you and don't consider other variables as I did above, what is more important? Mobil1 showed higher oxidation than RedLine but lower wear metals. So, in a 1k OCI, I would also agree that Mobil1 is the better oil. We really can't assume anything about the 3k interval because Mobil1 wasn't tested to 3k.
This only opens the doors to more questions. What happens to the wear metals once the oxidation reaches 100%? If Mobil1 showed an oxidation increase over 3k like Redline did, it would have reached 100% before 2k miles. What would this do to the inside of the engine to continued running with 100% oxidation up to 3k miles? While the RedLine showed higher wear metals to start, Mobil1 wear metals may jump once the oxidation reaches 100%. What about the sludge build up inside of the engine? Mobil1 may wear less, but sludge up the insideof the engine causing increased wear down the road while Redline doesn't create as much sludge and continues to wear at the same rate. Which one will kill the engine first?
We really can't assume anything from this guys study without additional studies.
All that we really know for sure is that any oil that can protect these old british bike engines (which can kill an oil in a few hundred miles) will perform great in a modern bike.