Recent Topics
Date on your phone
by Benito
06/30/15 08:40 PM
HOA orders resident to take down US Flag
by KD0AXS
06/30/15 08:22 PM
07 4Runner 4.7 Mobil 1 0w40/5w30 HM 5300 miles
by Toy4x4
06/30/15 07:41 PM
Mazda AJTM-14-302 Filter Cut Open
by Brian Barnhart
06/30/15 07:34 PM
Oil catch can
by BowNisPar
06/30/15 07:14 PM
Strongest cleaning additive you've used/gasoline
by kyledallas
06/30/15 06:57 PM
2014 Tacoma 4.0L - PYB 5w30 - 25,000mi
by VR6
06/30/15 06:50 PM
When to Change? Old car brought back to life....
by PReal
06/30/15 06:29 PM
Any radio techs? help!
by expat
06/30/15 06:25 PM
My oil change story
by KrisZ
06/30/15 05:37 PM
What is my bottleneck?
by Vern_in_IL
06/30/15 05:37 PM
Ford Ecoboost 2.0L-Any Good
by Joeforester
06/30/15 05:26 PM
Newest Members
georges77, LesterL, farquar13, UncleGuy, blaSSt
54538 Registered Users
Who's Online
104 registered (05lgt, ABerns, 90crvtec, 3311, 10 invisible), 1774 Guests and 100 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54538 Members
66 Forums
233636 Topics
3752301 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3320757 - 03/23/14 10:57 AM Honda NM4 Vultus
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 28569
Loc: Great Lakes
I admit, it does kind of look cool, but at 500+ lbs of weight and only a 54hp 750cc engine, it appears to have more bark than bite. There doesn't seem to be a manual trans option either.


http://www.topspeed.com/motorcycles/motorcycle-reviews/honda/2014-honda-nm4-vultus-ar162851.html

_________________________
'02 530i (PPE 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T

Top
#3320786 - 03/23/14 11:24 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
simple_gifts Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 9885
Loc: Middlesex County CT
I'm liking the lean toward practical, low maintenance and low rpm bikes. nc700x, ctx etc; I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

I don't think it is targeting the B.A. crowd, like it was pointed out that it might be a "Bat Bike" quiet and slow have advantages in stealth ; I see a little bit of scooter in it. Maybe that is just me.

no MT is a no starter for me.



Edited by simple_gifts (03/23/14 11:26 AM)
_________________________
2003 Echo >368K miles; ST 10W-40HM and some #132
2006 B2300;94K;ALM

Note to park visitors: Yellowstone wildlife is wild

Top
#3320790 - 03/23/14 11:27 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
skyactiv Offline


Registered: 03/02/13
Posts: 1135
Loc: The Midwest
That's a scooter cycle. Nothing wrong with the automatic. Seems low on power but must have nice lazy torque for the person who doesn't wanna flog it.

Hardly anyone who buys a new vehicle wants a stick which is 10X better than shifting a motorcycle. As someone who's been licensed on two wheels since 1988, I hate pegging a shifter up and down on a motorcycle. I see HD making a successful automatic on a cruiser and a transition to buyers preferring automatic bikes in the future.
_________________________
Wife: 15' Audi A4 quattro 6 speed manual
Me: 13' VW GTI 3 door 6 speed manual

Top
#3320815 - 03/23/14 12:14 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 28569
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

Most new riders would probably not want 500+ lbs on their first purchase either. I know I didn't.

_________________________
'02 530i (PPE 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T

Top
#3320855 - 03/23/14 01:15 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 4366
Loc: Ohio
That is not a scooter. That is a motorcycle with an automatic transmission.
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320858 - 03/23/14 01:16 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 4366
Loc: Ohio
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

Most new riders would probably not want 500+ lbs on their first purchase either. I know I didn't.



+2 Mine was a 354lb Yamaha 350. That was 30+ years ago. Now I ride an 800lb bike. HUGE difference.
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320862 - 03/23/14 01:19 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 4366
Loc: Ohio
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320924 - 03/23/14 02:15 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Doog]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 28569
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: Doog

Yes, I posted about it a few weeks ago, but Yamaha has priced it too high, IMO...

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/3309405/New_old_Yamaha_SR400#Post3309405
_________________________
'02 530i (PPE 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T

Top
#3320994 - 03/23/14 03:16 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
simple_gifts Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 9885
Loc: Middlesex County CT
OT:If I am 6' 3" 270lbs, is a 500lb starter bike a concern?
_________________________
2003 Echo >368K miles; ST 10W-40HM and some #132
2006 B2300;94K;ALM

Note to park visitors: Yellowstone wildlife is wild

Top
#3321016 - 03/23/14 03:40 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 28569
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
OT:If I am 6' 3" 270lbs, is a 500lb starter bike a concern?

You'd probably be OK. It also depends on where most of that weight sits. Some bikes have the center of gravity very low to the ground and feel lighter than others with similar weight.
_________________________
'02 530i (PPE 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T

Top
#3321711 - 03/24/14 08:16 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
sunruh Offline


Registered: 06/28/05
Posts: 1714
Loc: Cedar Park, TX
its a 500lb scooter!
_________________________
motorcycle oil myth buster

Top
#3324527 - 03/26/14 05:54 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Cujet Offline


Registered: 02/15/03
Posts: 4835
Loc: Jupiter, Florida
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm liking the lean toward practical, low maintenance and low rpm bikes. nc700x, ctx etc; I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.


Having ridden a number of these new, underpowered and low revving bikes, I have to say that I despise them. The lack of power is absolutely unnecessary. Believe it or not, we have the technology today to produce engines that have excellent economy and excellent power, all while being incredibly smooth and tractable.

Own one of these low powered, overweight bikes for a while and a suspect even a newbie will be wanting more power.

One thing people tend to forget. Motorcycles are all quite fast off the line. But due to massive aerodynamic drag, a good bit of HP is required to achieve highway speeds. When loaded up, and on the highway, these lower powered bikes really struggle when more power is "asked for" such as when passing a large truck.
_________________________
Turbo's rule.

Top