Recent Topics
Bad fuel?
by wemay
8 minutes 4 seconds ago
Mobil1 prices go up..
by lawman1909
10 minutes 42 seconds ago
need help with grinding noise (pictures)
by friendly_jacek
36 minutes 20 seconds ago
Refinishing a wood extension ladder.
by mrsilv04
Today at 02:07 PM
Hi temp Lithium
by Dallas69
Today at 01:58 PM
Hitachi HPFPs
by Nick R
Today at 01:45 PM
Oil Suggestions
by berserkerx
Today at 01:30 PM
1:18 diecast car toy clear case ?
by MetalSlug
Today at 01:16 PM
Cutting hanger slot in wood
by KD0AXS
Today at 01:04 PM
What oil to use for an Aristo 2JZ-GTE VVT-i ?
by afree
Today at 12:50 PM
Thinking about switching from M1 HM to ?
by LocoTex
Today at 12:40 PM
using a Motorcraft filter
by ram_man
Today at 12:33 PM
Newest Members
dee242, OilNovice, krunk, FSully1, Jtyler
51973 Registered Users
Who's Online
88 registered (afree, aquariuscsm, aa1986, another Todd, 2004tdigls, bdcardinal, 9 invisible), 1847 Guests and 176 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51973 Members
64 Forums
222480 Topics
3521215 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3320757 - 03/23/14 10:57 AM Honda NM4 Vultus
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26135
Loc: Michigan
I admit, it does kind of look cool, but at 500+ lbs of weight and only a 54hp 750cc engine, it appears to have more bark than bite. There doesn't seem to be a manual trans option either.


http://www.topspeed.com/motorcycles/motorcycle-reviews/honda/2014-honda-nm4-vultus-ar162851.html

_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3320786 - 03/23/14 11:24 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
simple_gifts Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 9113
Loc: Middlesex County CT
I'm liking the lean toward practical, low maintenance and low rpm bikes. nc700x, ctx etc; I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

I don't think it is targeting the B.A. crowd, like it was pointed out that it might be a "Bat Bike" quiet and slow have advantages in stealth ; I see a little bit of scooter in it. Maybe that is just me.

no MT is a no starter for me.



Edited by simple_gifts (03/23/14 11:26 AM)
_________________________
2003 Echo >350K miles;Supergard 5W-[23]0;
2006 B2300;90K;ALM

Top
#3320790 - 03/23/14 11:27 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
skyactiv Offline


Registered: 03/02/13
Posts: 677
Loc: The Midwest
That's a scooter cycle. Nothing wrong with the automatic. Seems low on power but must have nice lazy torque for the person who doesn't wanna flog it.

Hardly anyone who buys a new vehicle wants a stick which is 10X better than shifting a motorcycle. As someone who's been licensed on two wheels since 1988, I hate pegging a shifter up and down on a motorcycle. I see HD making a successful automatic on a cruiser and a transition to buyers preferring automatic bikes in the future.

Top
#3320815 - 03/23/14 12:14 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26135
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

Most new riders would probably not want 500+ lbs on their first purchase either. I know I didn't.

_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3320855 - 03/23/14 01:15 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 3497
Loc: Ohio
That is not a scooter. That is a motorcycle with an automatic transmission.
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320858 - 03/23/14 01:16 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 3497
Loc: Ohio
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

Most new riders would probably not want 500+ lbs on their first purchase either. I know I didn't.



+2 Mine was a 354lb Yamaha 350. That was 30+ years ago. Now I ride an 800lb bike. HUGE difference.
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320862 - 03/23/14 01:19 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 3497
Loc: Ohio
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320924 - 03/23/14 02:15 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Doog]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26135
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: Doog

Yes, I posted about it a few weeks ago, but Yamaha has priced it too high, IMO...

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/3309405/New_old_Yamaha_SR400#Post3309405
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3320994 - 03/23/14 03:16 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
simple_gifts Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 9113
Loc: Middlesex County CT
OT:If I am 6' 3" 270lbs, is a 500lb starter bike a concern?
_________________________
2003 Echo >350K miles;Supergard 5W-[23]0;
2006 B2300;90K;ALM

Top
#3321016 - 03/23/14 03:40 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26135
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
OT:If I am 6' 3" 270lbs, is a 500lb starter bike a concern?

You'd probably be OK. It also depends on where most of that weight sits. Some bikes have the center of gravity very low to the ground and feel lighter than others with similar weight.
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3321711 - 03/24/14 08:16 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
sunruh Offline


Registered: 06/28/05
Posts: 1634
Loc: Cedar Park, TX
its a 500lb scooter!
_________________________
motorcycle oil myth buster

Top
#3324527 - 03/26/14 05:54 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Cujet Offline


Registered: 02/15/03
Posts: 4298
Loc: Jupiter, Florida
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm liking the lean toward practical, low maintenance and low rpm bikes. nc700x, ctx etc; I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.


Having ridden a number of these new, underpowered and low revving bikes, I have to say that I despise them. The lack of power is absolutely unnecessary. Believe it or not, we have the technology today to produce engines that have excellent economy and excellent power, all while being incredibly smooth and tractable.

Own one of these low powered, overweight bikes for a while and a suspect even a newbie will be wanting more power.

One thing people tend to forget. Motorcycles are all quite fast off the line. But due to massive aerodynamic drag, a good bit of HP is required to achieve highway speeds. When loaded up, and on the highway, these lower powered bikes really struggle when more power is "asked for" such as when passing a large truck.
_________________________
Turbo's rule.

Top