Recent Topics
Another one gone
by Inspecktor
18 minutes 11 seconds ago
2015 Impala vs...
by oilpsi2high
Today at 01:04 PM
Magnatec Spotted at AAP
by BTLew81
Today at 01:00 PM
Automatic Car Wash/DIY
by lawman1909
Today at 12:17 PM
Coolant refill
by supton
Today at 12:12 PM
Music is horrible today...
by MalfunctionProne
Today at 12:07 PM
180k mile Clean engine pictures
by donnyj08
Today at 11:45 AM
Autel MaxiDAS® DS708
by Michael_P
Today at 11:37 AM
Gulf War Story
by redbone3
Today at 10:41 AM
Oils that dont burn in a healthy 5.4L Triton?
by 2012AccentSE
Today at 10:41 AM
Purolator 14477 For toyota spin on
by kazual881
Today at 10:16 AM
Wow...what a shame.
by andrewg
Today at 10:16 AM
Newest Members
Kaiser_Sosse, jnormando, consolidated, mike_a, dlayman
52261 Registered Users
Who's Online
128 registered (aa1986, aquariuscsm, Alltherage, -SyN-, 15 invisible), 1632 Guests and 226 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
52261 Members
66 Forums
223797 Topics
3549687 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3320757 - 03/23/14 10:57 AM Honda NM4 Vultus
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26526
Loc: Michigan
I admit, it does kind of look cool, but at 500+ lbs of weight and only a 54hp 750cc engine, it appears to have more bark than bite. There doesn't seem to be a manual trans option either.


http://www.topspeed.com/motorcycles/motorcycle-reviews/honda/2014-honda-nm4-vultus-ar162851.html

_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3320786 - 03/23/14 11:24 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
simple_gifts Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 9225
Loc: Middlesex County CT
I'm liking the lean toward practical, low maintenance and low rpm bikes. nc700x, ctx etc; I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

I don't think it is targeting the B.A. crowd, like it was pointed out that it might be a "Bat Bike" quiet and slow have advantages in stealth ; I see a little bit of scooter in it. Maybe that is just me.

no MT is a no starter for me.



Edited by simple_gifts (03/23/14 11:26 AM)
_________________________
2003 Echo >353K miles;ALM
2006 B2300;90K;ALM

Top
#3320790 - 03/23/14 11:27 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
skyactiv Offline


Registered: 03/02/13
Posts: 740
Loc: The Midwest
That's a scooter cycle. Nothing wrong with the automatic. Seems low on power but must have nice lazy torque for the person who doesn't wanna flog it.

Hardly anyone who buys a new vehicle wants a stick which is 10X better than shifting a motorcycle. As someone who's been licensed on two wheels since 1988, I hate pegging a shifter up and down on a motorcycle. I see HD making a successful automatic on a cruiser and a transition to buyers preferring automatic bikes in the future.

Top
#3320815 - 03/23/14 12:14 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26526
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

Most new riders would probably not want 500+ lbs on their first purchase either. I know I didn't.

_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3320855 - 03/23/14 01:15 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 3563
Loc: Ohio
That is not a scooter. That is a motorcycle with an automatic transmission.
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320858 - 03/23/14 01:16 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 3563
Loc: Ohio
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.

Most new riders would probably not want 500+ lbs on their first purchase either. I know I didn't.



+2 Mine was a 354lb Yamaha 350. That was 30+ years ago. Now I ride an 800lb bike. HUGE difference.
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320862 - 03/23/14 01:19 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 3563
Loc: Ohio
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3320924 - 03/23/14 02:15 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Doog]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26526
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: Doog

Yes, I posted about it a few weeks ago, but Yamaha has priced it too high, IMO...

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/3309405/New_old_Yamaha_SR400#Post3309405
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3320994 - 03/23/14 03:16 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
simple_gifts Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 9225
Loc: Middlesex County CT
OT:If I am 6' 3" 270lbs, is a 500lb starter bike a concern?
_________________________
2003 Echo >353K miles;ALM
2006 B2300;90K;ALM

Top
#3321016 - 03/23/14 03:40 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 26526
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
OT:If I am 6' 3" 270lbs, is a 500lb starter bike a concern?

You'd probably be OK. It also depends on where most of that weight sits. Some bikes have the center of gravity very low to the ground and feel lighter than others with similar weight.
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3321711 - 03/24/14 08:16 AM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: Quattro Pete]
sunruh Offline


Registered: 06/28/05
Posts: 1647
Loc: Cedar Park, TX
its a 500lb scooter!
_________________________
motorcycle oil myth buster

Top
#3324527 - 03/26/14 05:54 PM Re: Honda NM4 Vultus [Re: simple_gifts]
Cujet Offline


Registered: 02/15/03
Posts: 4363
Loc: Jupiter, Florida
Originally Posted By: simple_gifts
I'm liking the lean toward practical, low maintenance and low rpm bikes. nc700x, ctx etc; I'm not sure I want a 2.5 second 0-60, 12K red line on my first purchase.


Having ridden a number of these new, underpowered and low revving bikes, I have to say that I despise them. The lack of power is absolutely unnecessary. Believe it or not, we have the technology today to produce engines that have excellent economy and excellent power, all while being incredibly smooth and tractable.

Own one of these low powered, overweight bikes for a while and a suspect even a newbie will be wanting more power.

One thing people tend to forget. Motorcycles are all quite fast off the line. But due to massive aerodynamic drag, a good bit of HP is required to achieve highway speeds. When loaded up, and on the highway, these lower powered bikes really struggle when more power is "asked for" such as when passing a large truck.
_________________________
Turbo's rule.

Top