Recent Topics
Easter messing about
by Shannow
04/21/14 06:54 AM
9K OCI on dino oil?
by Spetz
04/21/14 06:51 AM
DSG Transmission
by Dually
04/21/14 06:21 AM
Wal-Mart concept truck...
by mattwithcats
04/21/14 04:09 AM
Natural Look vs Glassy Look - Which do you prefer?
by The Critic
04/21/14 03:12 AM
Car Leasing
by bobbob
04/21/14 12:22 AM
Bosch 3300 cut open..
by DSparks
04/21/14 12:21 AM
Yokohama Avid Ascend tire issues (kinda long)
by Racerjk
04/20/14 11:56 PM
Fuel Filter Problems
by tai27yiuop
04/20/14 11:44 PM
GM 4200 knocking noise
by i6pwr
04/20/14 11:32 PM
Last Corvettes recovered...
by mattwithcats
04/20/14 11:24 PM
09 Flex - how to put in Techron
by Barkleymut
04/20/14 11:06 PM
Newest Members
Rond310, corollasienna, Truck25Engine, budzman, adtslo
49651 Registered Users
Who's Online
78 registered (97f150, andyd, 123Saab, 1foxracing, aquariuscsm, Anies, 8 invisible), 1104 Guests and 178 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
49651 Members
64 Forums
212201 Topics
3325985 Posts

Max Online: 2605 @ 04/19/14 12:41 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3128297 - 09/18/13 06:51 AM GF-6 delayed again
jake88 Offline


Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 135
Loc: MO
http://www.imakenews.com/lng/e_article002788089.cfm?x=bmM3gHT,bpcHqJDR

Getting a robust new engine oil category, but it is taking a lot longer than expected...

Thoughts?
_________________________

'13 Mazda 3 Touring 5DR, 2.0L
'12 Ford Fiesta SE 4DR, 1.6L

Top
#3128338 - 09/18/13 07:37 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
A_Harman Online   content


Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 3665
Loc: Michigan
I didn't realize how many new tests were being developed for GF-6. And with new tests being developed for PC-11, no wonder things are stretching out. I wonder if this will affect introduction of the 16-weight?
_________________________
1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck

Top
#3128479 - 09/18/13 10:27 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: A_Harman]
dparm Offline


Registered: 04/19/10
Posts: 11792
Loc: Lombard, IL
Originally Posted By: A_Harman
I didn't realize how many new tests were being developed for GF-6. And with new tests being developed for PC-11, no wonder things are stretching out. I wonder if this will affect introduction of the 16-weight?



Unsure. The weighting is an SAE thing so there's technically nothing stopping them from offering it. We already have a few 0w15s.
_________________________
2011.5 BMW M3 saloon ZCP
der stärkste buchstabe der welt
Mobil 1 0w40 + Mahle OX 254D3

Top
#3129280 - 09/19/13 07:05 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: dparm]
jake88 Offline


Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 135
Loc: MO
SAE already approved the 0W-16, but I am not sure that many marketers/OEMs are going to be jumping out there with SAE 0W-16 grades until there is a lot of data on the new engine test stands. The rumor I have heard from industry folks is that the 0W-16 is being met with a lot of skepticism from all but one or two OEMs
_________________________

'13 Mazda 3 Touring 5DR, 2.0L
'12 Ford Fiesta SE 4DR, 1.6L

Top
#3131477 - 09/21/13 10:19 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
RF Overlord Online   content


Registered: 11/08/03
Posts: 2921
Loc: Cape Cod, MA
We are all "just" getting used to 0W-20...introducing 0W-16 so soon may be premature.

Related question: Since we all accept that these new "thinner' oils were introduced for fuel economy, how much improvement can be squeezed from using ever-thinner oils?

Please note: I am not claiming 5W-20 et. al. have no value other than fuel economy. I accept that it's been proven they are good oils, I just don't know how much more improvement there is to be had from 0W-16? Are we destined to spend $500 more per engine in redesign costs to save 0.01% in fuel costs?
_________________________
Supercharged '03 Mercury Marauder - Trilogy Motorsports #61
PP 5W-30 / MC FL820S

Y2K Grand Marquis GS - daily driver
M1 5W-30 / MC FL820S

Top
#3132142 - 09/22/13 07:35 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: RF Overlord]
David1 Offline


Registered: 06/17/13
Posts: 498
Loc: USA, FLA
Originally Posted By: RF Overlord
We are all "just" getting used to 0W-20...introducing 0W-16 so soon may be premature.

Related question: Since we all accept that these new "thinner' oils were introduced for fuel economy, how much improvement can be squeezed from using ever-thinner oils?

Please note: I am not claiming 5W-20 et. al. have no value other than fuel economy. I accept that it's been proven they are good oils, I just don't know how much more improvement there is to be had from 0W-16? Are we destined to spend $500 more per engine in redesign costs to save 0.01% in fuel costs?



what about 0 w 5

or 0 w 0

is that even possible?

0 w 0

?????????????
_________________________
2002 Honda Accord V6 3.0 Automatic Trans 183000 Miles
Valvoline Maxx Life 5W30
FRAM ULTRA OR FRAM TOUGH GUARD Or HONDA Filtech A01s

Top
#3133008 - 09/23/13 12:15 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
901Memphis Offline


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 3606
Loc: Northern Kentucky
There was a neo 0w5 and maybe more out there for racing.
_________________________
'99 Ford Taurus 145k (Vulcan v6) - Current Fill = M1 HM 5w30 | FL400S
'02 Buick Century 98k (3.1 v6)- PU 5w30 / Fram Ultra XG 3980 / Filter mag

Top
#3133010 - 09/23/13 12:19 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
901Memphis Offline


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 3606
Loc: Northern Kentucky
http://paceperformance.com/i-6303128-rpm04205-royal-rurple-xpr-3-1-0w5-synthetic-racing-motor-oil-1-gallon-bottle.htmlttp://www.bakerprecision.com/neo/0w5.htm

http://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?pid=11&pcid=1


http://m.summitracing.com/search/brand/l.../oil-weight/0w5



.
_________________________
'99 Ford Taurus 145k (Vulcan v6) - Current Fill = M1 HM 5w30 | FL400S
'02 Buick Century 98k (3.1 v6)- PU 5w30 / Fram Ultra XG 3980 / Filter mag

Top
#3133349 - 09/23/13 11:16 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: David1]
NateDN10 Offline


Registered: 01/10/10
Posts: 1329
Loc: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted By: David1



what about 0 w 5

or 0 w 0

is that even possible?

0 w 0

?????????????

The "weights" are standards classified by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). SAE 16 is the thinnest and most recent standard. There are no official SAE standards below this. So it's certainly possible to make a thinner oil, it wouldn't have an official SAE number.
_________________________
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt - 81,000 mi.
2012 Mazda5 - 60,000 mi.

Top
#3133545 - 09/23/13 02:53 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: NateDN10]
jake88 Offline


Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 135
Loc: MO
Originally Posted By: NateDN10
Originally Posted By: David1



what about 0 w 5

or 0 w 0

is that even possible?

0 w 0

?????????????

The "weights" are standards classified by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). SAE 16 is the thinnest and most recent standard. There are no official SAE standards below this. So it's certainly possible to make a thinner oil, it wouldn't have an official SAE number.


Indeed, anything lighter than an SAE 16 is not really classified as a multi-grade oil. For instance an oil with a KV@100C of 4.5 would just be labeled as whatever winter-grade number the cold-flow properties dictate (e.g. SAE 0W)
_________________________

'13 Mazda 3 Touring 5DR, 2.0L
'12 Ford Fiesta SE 4DR, 1.6L

Top
#3134366 - 09/24/13 11:31 AM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
vinu_neuro Offline


Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 936
Loc: Chicago / IN
SAE papers published by big name formulators last year showed very serious durability issues with 16wt, 5-6 times the wear in IVA compared to 20wt.
_________________________
01 Honda Prelude SH | Rotella T6 5W-40

Top
#3134518 - 09/24/13 12:51 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: vinu_neuro]
jake88 Offline


Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 135
Loc: MO
I am in total agreement on the accelerated wear issue. What good is an increase of <1mpg if it significantly shortens the life of the engine?... then again, if I was in the business of selling new engines I may sing a different tune.
_________________________

'13 Mazda 3 Touring 5DR, 2.0L
'12 Ford Fiesta SE 4DR, 1.6L

Top
#3134828 - 09/24/13 04:50 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
bluesubie Offline


Registered: 08/04/03
Posts: 1765
Loc: NJ
Originally Posted By: jake88
I am in total agreement on the accelerated wear issue. What good is an increase of <1mpg if it significantly shortens the life of the engine?... then again, if I was in the business of selling new engines I may sing a different tune.

That <1 mpg for an entire fleet really adds up when it comes to CAFE fines and credits. It's probably cheaper to just replace a few dozen engines than to risk losing credits or paying fines.

Subaru is having consumption issues with the new Forester and Impreza engines that spec 0W-20. I've been reading about engine replacements, re-ring jobs on 2014's, lemon law buy-backs, etc. I guess Subaru/Fuji Heavy still has some work to do on building engines that run on thin oils (although the Euro sub 2.0 engines have specced 0W-20 for years).

I hope GF-6 is delayed or revised to remove 0W-16.

-Dennis


Edited by bluesubie (09/24/13 04:51 PM)
_________________________
'04 Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Motul X-cess 5W-40 | OEM Honeywell filter

Top
#3134838 - 09/24/13 04:58 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
vinu_neuro Offline


Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 936
Loc: Chicago / IN
Honda is biggest proponent I think. Even if it comes through doesn't mean the other OEM's will adopt it.
_________________________
01 Honda Prelude SH | Rotella T6 5W-40

Top
#3135607 - 09/25/13 12:08 PM Re: GF-6 delayed again [Re: jake88]
bluesubie Offline


Registered: 08/04/03
Posts: 1765
Loc: NJ
I guess SoA saw my rant above.

http://techinfo.subaru.com/static/whatsNew.html

02-145-13 Technical Service Bulletin Surface Treatment Change To Oil Control Piston Rings (2012-2013MY Impreza and 2013MY XV Crosstrek) Sep 25, 2013 [View PDF]

02-144-13 Technical Service Bulletin Surface Treatment Change To Oil Control Piston Rings (2012-2014MY Forester) Sep 25, 2013 [View PDF]

Bring on the 0W-16? laugh

-Dennis
_________________________
'04 Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Motul X-cess 5W-40 | OEM Honeywell filter

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >