Recent Topics
Aluminum-based grease through u-joints/ball joints
by Mambo_Dave
31 minutes 24 seconds ago
400,000 miles! Pic!
by Chris142
52 minutes 58 seconds ago
Michelin M/S2 vs A/T2---SNOW!
by lukejo
Today at 10:39 PM
Opinions wanted: used family car options for $15K
by DrivinWest
Today at 10:20 PM
XG2 - 10000 & 7000 mile versions spotted today
by Apollo14
Today at 10:17 PM
What additives DO NOT show up in uoa's?
by m6pwr
Today at 10:00 PM
Route 66 - What Would You Do?
by 2010_FX4
Today at 09:05 PM
Pennzoil Platinum BITOG approved?
by jiffydarren
Today at 09:00 PM
less than a month
by Donald
Today at 08:33 PM
Replacing the Dry Cracked Michelins
by Nick1994
Today at 08:31 PM
Any tips on reupholstering center arm rest?
by gregk24
Today at 08:09 PM
Which grand touring smoothest, quietest on Civic?
by flinter
Today at 08:08 PM
Newest Members
Krom11, psalty, BBBB, emg, morgantruce
51188 Registered Users
Who's Online
63 registered (Azeem, 6starprez, asiancivicmaniac, Apollo14, 5 invisible), 1131 Guests and 250 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51188 Members
64 Forums
218726 Topics
3449037 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >
Topic Options
#3024150 - 06/05/13 09:58 PM E-85. I think I'm a convert.
Grebbler Offline


Registered: 01/14/09
Posts: 79
Loc: SE Michigan, USA
I normally avoided this stuff like the plague. I used to travel a lot for work and I usually did my driving at night when open gas stations in the boonies were few and far between. I needed all the range I could get.

Now I stay around home and a nearby BP started carrying E-85 priced 60 cents below the cheap stuff. I gave it a shot and the Tahoe seems to like it.

I just finished a tank so the computer should be calibrated by now so I will start the MPG logs. The current price spread is 90 cents per gallon and I plan to stick with for awhile.

E-85 pump has a decal warning not to use additives but I wonder if I need to worry about top cylinder lubrication or the fuel pump.

Any thoughts?
_________________________
2002 Tahoe LS 4x4 5.3L
2005 Cobalt (GF)
1999 Blazer 2-Door 4.3L
1991 S-10 2.8L
1985 Crown Victoria 351 VV
1984 GMC Sierra 3500 3+3 Crew Cab 350

Top
#3024166 - 06/05/13 10:14 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 3440
Loc: Ohio
Originally Posted By: Grebbler

Any thoughts?


Yeah, the price of food will double again if more corn is pushed into the fuel market and out of the feed market. In the long run we will all pay more for this folly. Plus you get worse MPGs anyway.
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer...

Top
#3024175 - 06/05/13 10:29 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
Andy636 Offline


Registered: 12/30/10
Posts: 418
Loc: Romania
Dang...cheap gas got even cheaper...I envy you so much guys.

Fact - Around here lots of cars are converted to LPG due to hi gas price and they are running just fine even after 7-8 years, now the LPG compared to your E85 is bone dry and doing nada for top cylinder lubrication.

If your car is a flex fuel one and you get more miles/$ from E85 I would stick with that.

Top
#3024177 - 06/05/13 10:32 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
DrDusty86 Offline


Registered: 01/04/11
Posts: 1491
Loc: TX
who cares, it's E-85! lol what about oil changes, some manufactures recommend short oci when running the E-85 stuff.
Worried about your fuel pump, that vintage GM truck chassis has wonky pumps that would crater rather soon/easily. The BEST advise I have for you regarding your fuel pump is to NEVER let it run below 1/4 tank as the pump is submerged in fuel to keep cool and to change your fuel filter based on the severe change interval. Back pressure can kill a weak/marginal GM pump quickly. You want to keep that filter changed to reduce back pressure. I have changed Many pumps on a 97 Z71 and an 05 Z71 with a 5.3.


Edited by DrDusty86 (06/05/13 10:34 PM)

Top
#3024180 - 06/05/13 10:34 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
ChevyBadger Offline


Registered: 01/14/13
Posts: 518
Loc: Wisconsin
Can you run E85 in a 02 Tahoe? Im assuming your talking about the Tahoe in your sig. I ran it in my truck and got such bad mileage it wasnt worth the cheaper price.


Edited by ChevyBadger (06/05/13 10:37 PM)
_________________________
08 Chevy Silverado mixture of VWB and Napa syn 5w30 Napa Pro Select filter
04 Chevy Impala mixture of VWB an Napa syn 5w30 Microguard filter

Top
#3024184 - 06/05/13 10:40 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
DrDusty86 Offline


Registered: 01/04/11
Posts: 1491
Loc: TX
Any fuel with ethonal will drop the milage. It is obvious that the op bought into the hype.

Top
#3024186 - 06/05/13 10:43 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
Danno Offline


Registered: 10/07/12
Posts: 743
Loc: Northern Ontario, Canada
Mileage as in "gallons per mile" mileage?

Top
#3024189 - 06/05/13 10:45 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
ChevyBadger Offline


Registered: 01/14/13
Posts: 518
Loc: Wisconsin
Yea I knew Id get less mileage but it dropped it to about 10. I usually run around 17 with 87 octane regular no lead.
_________________________
08 Chevy Silverado mixture of VWB and Napa syn 5w30 Napa Pro Select filter
04 Chevy Impala mixture of VWB an Napa syn 5w30 Microguard filter

Top
#3024202 - 06/05/13 11:19 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
Rolla07 Offline


Registered: 11/05/11
Posts: 1661
Loc: MTL, CANADA
So less 25% in gas price up front but 30-40% worse mileage?whats the point?
_________________________
2007 Corolla Red Pearl 120,000 miles
M1 AFE 0W20 oil/ Fram TG filter
2001 Accent 126,000 miles
Motomaster Supreme/ Pure One filter



Top
#3024212 - 06/05/13 11:37 PM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
zloveraz Offline


Registered: 04/07/10
Posts: 856
Loc: Plano, TX
Originally Posted By: Grebbler
I normally avoided this stuff like the plague. I used to travel a lot for work and I usually did my driving at night when open gas stations in the boonies were few and far between. I needed all the range I could get.

Now I stay around home and a nearby BP started carrying E-85 priced 60 cents below the cheap stuff. I gave it a shot and the Tahoe seems to like it.

I just finished a tank so the computer should be calibrated by now so I will start the MPG logs. The current price spread is 90 cents per gallon and I plan to stick with for awhile.

E-85 pump has a decal warning not to use additives but I wonder if I need to worry about top cylinder lubrication or the fuel pump.

Any thoughts?


I'd read this: http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/e85-vs-gasoline-comparison-test.html
_________________________
11 G37S, QSUD, microGreen MG101-7
14 BMW F800GS Adventure

Top
#3024240 - 06/06/13 01:19 AM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
Jocephus Offline


Registered: 04/28/12
Posts: 219
Loc: AR
I drive the same route 3 times per week on highway...146 miles round trip. I Set the cruise control when I hit I-40 so for probably 130 miles i'm on the cruise control.

My Escalade with 6.2L V8
On 100% gas I get 18.4 mpg
On 10% ethanol I get 15.7 mpg
On E85 I get 13.2 mpg

I only run 100% gas now after doing the test for a month...even wrote my congressman a letter with the full supportive documentation. Heard nothing back.

I still don't understand the governments thinking of how getting less gas mileage saves fuel.
_________________________
14 Chevy Silverado (AC Delco dexos 0w20)
12 Cadillac Escalade (M1)
11 Toyota Corolla (Toyota)
06 Jeep Grand Cherokee (maxlife)


Top
#3024290 - 06/06/13 03:41 AM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Rolla07]
Clevy Offline


Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 7108
Loc: Saskatoon canada
Originally Posted By: Rolla07
So less 25% in gas price up front but 30-40% worse mileage?whats the point?
exactly. It actually costs more in the end because of how much more is required to get you around.
I certainly understand,and would use it myself if it the end result saved me money however in this case it costs more per mile than gasoline so at the end of the day you have less money in your pocket.
My hemi for example. I couldn't get an more than 15mpg with regular fuel in the tank but premium(100% gasoline)consistently got me 20 or more mpg. My commute is 30 miles each way on the flatest roads you ever drove and I track every tanks mileage. I very rarely do any city driving in it.
Anyways it cost 10 cents a litre so roughly 40 cents a gallon more which is roughly 10% more per fill up to get 25% better mileage. So in my case the added expense pays off.
If I did nothing but nothing but city miles my mileage dips to 10-12 mpg and never really changed no matter which grade fuel was in it,so the added expense nets no reward so there would really be no point in my case to use premium if all my miles we city miles and I'd just use regular.
Getting 6000 pounds moving is much more difficult than keeping it moving.
So if that is also the case in the op's situation then I understand using e85 however in this case I'd track a few tanks to be sure.
Are we talking about an 02 silverado?
We're they even flex fuel equipped then? If they aren't then there would be absolutely no benefit using it. The ecu will not ad timing nor compensate with enough fuel and there is potentially a risk of engine damage because the ecu will not recognize it being an oxygenated fuel and tuning won't be accurate for that high alcohol content.
If it is a flex fuel vehicle then rock on.
Put tc-w3 in with fuel.
_________________________
2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter

Top
#3024294 - 06/06/13 04:15 AM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Jocephus]
ueberooo Offline


Registered: 05/02/09
Posts: 687
Loc: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted By: Jocephus
My Escalade with 6.2L V8
On 100% gas I get 18.4 mpg
On 10% ethanol I get 15.7 mpg
On E85 I get 13.2 mpg

I only run 100% gas now after doing the test for a month...even wrote my congressman a letter with the full supportive documentation. Heard nothing back.


One highway, zero city. Just kidding. No, I totally agree with you and hope your congressman listens to the input. I think fuel should be anywhere from E0 to E10. We should only burn stale expiring grain stocks as auto fuel.

Except if it's GMO; then it's safer to burn it than have anyone or anything eat it.
_________________________
--- 1995 Subie Imp EJ18, MT, with ~ 188K miles.... 10w30. I <3 MoS2 + B + Zn ----

Top
#3024334 - 06/06/13 06:15 AM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Grebbler]
95busa Offline


Registered: 10/15/05
Posts: 1051
Loc: Virginia
Would you rather pay a farmer or a haji? Easy question for this guy.
_________________________
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty 4x4
2009 Dodge Grand Caravan
2006 Chrysler Pacifica Touring

Top
#3024420 - 06/06/13 07:55 AM Re: E-85. I think I'm a convert. [Re: Jocephus]
Miller88 Online   content


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 6347
Loc: Onondaga County
Originally Posted By: Jocephus


I still don't understand the governments thinking of how getting less gas mileage saves fuel.


They know it doesn't.

However, the agricorps that own a lot of senators and congressmen are pretty influential. They want to sell 100% of their corn and drive the demand up.

Pretty simple.
_________________________
'11 Focus PYB 45K
'00 Cherokee PYB 125K

Top
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >