IRS rear tire wear

Status
Not open for further replies.
I will also take that into account when I take the car in. Perhaps I was too focused and/or making assumptions about the camber, but looks like I should ensure that rear toe is correct as well. I have verified that the insde wear happens only on tires on the rear so I'm not mixing up anything to do on the front, no issues there.
thanks gents,
 
I thought I would bring this thread back for a little update.

Miles on the car at the time ofthe orginal posts was about 60K.
The first thing I did was to get the alignment checked to get a baseline - it was all over the place, way out of spec. I'm sorry I don't the numbers handy but the rear camber/toe was out as well as right side front. Front right could not be adjusted, needing an adjustable ball joint. One of my mistaken assumptions was that the front settings were ok, this was not the case.

Tires were shot as well, so I wanted to ensure that I had proper alignment to avoid tearing up a new set of tires.

Next step was to install the SPC rear camber kit and an adjustable (MOOG) ball joint in the front. Alignment was eyeballed at re-assembly. The SPC kit went on very easily, decent quality.

New set of tires went on, I chose Yokohama YK580 from Discount Tire.

Back to the alignment shop - alignment was able to be put back into factory settings with the adjustable rear camber kit and the new ball joint, plus toe, etc was set. I don't have those numbers handy either but I do remember that some negative rear camber was retained, I think it was around 1 degree.

Off I went into the sunset. As you would expect with new tires and proper alignment the car was a pleasure to drive. I did keep a close watch on the new tires to see if there were any signs of scrubbing or cupping. I just had the tires rotated at 67K miles and the wear is almost non-existent, no evidence of any of the issues I was encountering before.

At this point I'm pleased with the overall results, well worth the additional effort and cost. The only downside is that now I'm way too aware of how many cars out there are going down the road with almost a pyramid look from those back tires
smile.gif
 
Yes, negative rear camber is very apparent on cars when you're looking for it. -1 deg of rear camber is good, and probably right where Honda specifies. Our CR-V is sitting at closer to -2 deg of rear camber, and I'd like to install the SPC camber kit. I have it on the Acura and as you say the quality is very good.

Did you buy the kit from RockAuto? For my car, I think they have either a Moog or a Raybestos rear camber kit that looks EXACTLY like the SPC one. I think it may have even had SPC stamped on the adjusting knuckle.
 
I actually bought the kit from ebay seller Import Auto Performance. Since I knew the specific kit/part number, I shopped around to get a reasonable price. I based selection on the actual SPC kit since that's what I had seen installed with good results. But I agree with your comment about another brand.
For our Accord, Rockauto carries Raybestos and AC-Delco camber kits that for all I know could be re-branded SPC.
I paid $159 for the SPC kit, Raybestos is $123 and AC-Delco is $159.
Money well spent IMO, the previous tires were done in at less than 18K miles.
 
My wife's Mazda3 has had issues with rear tire wear, but my previous 07 Civic had even more severe negative camber and was fine, even when running directional tires (never rotated side-to-side).

IIRC we adjusted the toe after the Mazda wore out its first set of tires in 25k miles, and I've been more diligent about rotations and the second set of tires is wearing way better.

Getting the toe adjusted to the conservative end of spec might help.
 
I've seen old Escorts loaded down and thought for sure the rear tires were wearing the sidewalls there was so much tilt in!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top