Since this is kind of a fuel related question, figured I'd stick it here.
I just received this email and I know we have some really sharp chemists and engineers that might help shed some light on this guys problem. Here's the story....
MY INSURANCE SAYS THAT SUGAR CAN NOT DAMAGE MY ENGINE. SO WHY TEST FOR SUGAR? SUGAR WAS FOUND IN MY TANK AND THEN THE SYSTEM WAS FLUSHED, THEN SHORTLY AFTER MY ENGINE DEVELOPED A NOISE AND THEN BEGAN TO OVERHEAT. METAL WAS FOUND IN THE CRANKCASE AND ALL THE BEARINGS WERE WORN OR SLIGHTLY DAMAGED. WHAT IF ANY, ARE THE DIFFERENT WAYS THIS DAMAGE COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED (BY SUGAR) OR IS IT JUST COINCIDENTAL? PLEASE NOTE YOUR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION.
THANK YOU, G.T.
FYI
-REBUILT 1978 FORD 302 LESS THAN 25,000 MI./AUTOMATIC, AFTERMARKET PARTS BUT BASICALLY A STOCK SETUP.
-625 CFM CARTER CARB.
-FUEL FILTER IS LOCATED WITH-IN 15 IN OF THE CARB IN CLOSE PROXIMTY TO THE BLOCK AND HEADER.(HIGH HEAT AREA)
[ September 26, 2002, 09:43 AM: Message edited by: BOBISTHEOILGUY ]
I just received this email and I know we have some really sharp chemists and engineers that might help shed some light on this guys problem. Here's the story....
MY INSURANCE SAYS THAT SUGAR CAN NOT DAMAGE MY ENGINE. SO WHY TEST FOR SUGAR? SUGAR WAS FOUND IN MY TANK AND THEN THE SYSTEM WAS FLUSHED, THEN SHORTLY AFTER MY ENGINE DEVELOPED A NOISE AND THEN BEGAN TO OVERHEAT. METAL WAS FOUND IN THE CRANKCASE AND ALL THE BEARINGS WERE WORN OR SLIGHTLY DAMAGED. WHAT IF ANY, ARE THE DIFFERENT WAYS THIS DAMAGE COULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED (BY SUGAR) OR IS IT JUST COINCIDENTAL? PLEASE NOTE YOUR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION.
THANK YOU, G.T.
FYI
-REBUILT 1978 FORD 302 LESS THAN 25,000 MI./AUTOMATIC, AFTERMARKET PARTS BUT BASICALLY A STOCK SETUP.
-625 CFM CARTER CARB.
-FUEL FILTER IS LOCATED WITH-IN 15 IN OF THE CARB IN CLOSE PROXIMTY TO THE BLOCK AND HEADER.(HIGH HEAT AREA)
[ September 26, 2002, 09:43 AM: Message edited by: BOBISTHEOILGUY ]