In perusing the PQIA website, as well as VOA's and UOA's here, I've noticed extreme variations in the amount of these two additives. Some oils have a little of both, some have more of both, some have none, some have one or the other.
Do moly and boron have similar functions? Also, what would be considered a "significant" amount of either? According to the PQIA, Chevron Supreme SN has 175 of moly, and 109 of boron. I'm under the impression that that's a pretty good amount of moly for an SN oil.
OTOH, I see some oils with piddly little amounts of either like 30 or 40 ppm of moly, or even something like 9 ppm.
In the SM oils, QS had 51 of moly and 246 of boron, which I thought was pretty spiffy. Shell sort of had the reverse, with 226 and 74 respectively, which would make the moly lovers happy, I think.
Anyway, I'm just trying to understand the functions of these two additives, whether they're synergistic, and whether there's a threshold in ppm when they become beneficial.
Do moly and boron have similar functions? Also, what would be considered a "significant" amount of either? According to the PQIA, Chevron Supreme SN has 175 of moly, and 109 of boron. I'm under the impression that that's a pretty good amount of moly for an SN oil.
OTOH, I see some oils with piddly little amounts of either like 30 or 40 ppm of moly, or even something like 9 ppm.
In the SM oils, QS had 51 of moly and 246 of boron, which I thought was pretty spiffy. Shell sort of had the reverse, with 226 and 74 respectively, which would make the moly lovers happy, I think.
Anyway, I'm just trying to understand the functions of these two additives, whether they're synergistic, and whether there's a threshold in ppm when they become beneficial.