Red Dot on a G19 - Brownell’s RMR slide

Astro14

$100 Site Donor
Staff member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
20,541
Location
Virginia Beach
I’ve owned my Glock 19 for many years. Over a decade. A Gen 3.

It’s been a reliable, trouble, free gun, and the only change/upgrade/modification that it has ever had is an upgrade to Trijicon night sights.

Several months ago, Brownell’s had their Glock 19 RMR cut slide on sale for about $100. I bought one, along with a Brownells barrel and new internal slide parts. New recoil spring assembly as well.

This weekend, I installed a new set of sights on the Brownells slide, assembled the internals, and mounted a Holosun 507C. Yesterday, I took it to the range.

IMG_3089.jpeg


IMG_3091.jpeg


The Holosun has a choice of reticle - a dot, dot and ring, or just ring.

So, some observations. The Brownells slide, comes with a very slick, and somewhat thick, finish. It’s black, feels like DLC. The finish obstructed the firing pin hole, and I had to clean that out with a pick. Fitting the Holosun was also a challenge, I could fit a Trijicon, though it was tight, but the Holosun just wouldn’t fit. There was not enough room between the screw posts and the rear of the cut.

I tried to remove just a tiny bit of the finish on the rear of the cut. But even a diamond stone, which I use for sharpening woodworking tools like chisels, did not make much of a difference. The finish is truly impressive in its hardness, if a bit thick. Knowing that I would only mount the Holosun on this slide, on this gun, I removed a few thousands of an inch of material off the rear of the sight itself, and it fit snugly, into place.

The photographs show the original slide, barrel, and sights along with the new Brownells and Holosun set up.

I find that I am much slower acquiring the red dot than I am acquiring iron sights. I think that’s because for irons, you instinctively know which way to move the pistol to get good sight alignment. Iron sights are easy for me. The red dot is quite different, and if the pistol is a few degrees muzzle high, or muzzle low, you don’t see the red dot.

I spent a few hundred rounds getting the red dot sighted in, and getting my muscle memory developed for finding it, based on grip angle and feel.

As cool as the dot and circle reticle appears, the plain red dot is better for me. I find that if I present the pistol and focus on the front site, the red dot naturally appears. The combination of the circle and dot as a reticle simply highlights the slight movement and shaking that’s present anytime I’m holding the pistol on target. I don’t notice that with sites, but with a red dot, that tiny bit of motion, that half an inch at 10 yards, is very evident, and it’s distracting.

It took a few hundred rounds for the new slide and new barrel to break in. When I had the pistol on my bench, before taking it to the range, it was difficult to cycle by hand. The lock up was super tight. At the range, I had five or six times that the pistol did not go into battery after firing a round. A slight tap forward on the slide and it went fully back into battery. There was simply too much friction with the new finish on all the parts, until a bit of wear took place. This with that new recoil spring and guide rod.

The last malfunction (failure to go into battery) was at about the 150 round mark. After that, the slide and barrel combination, were good.

I shot the last hundred rounds for accuracy, at a moderate speed, so not looking for target shooting, really, it was much more quick, accurate enough, reliability, and sight evaluation shooting. After 200 rounds previous to the last hundred, I was much more comfortable with the red dot. Again this is a gun that I have owned for a very long time and through which I’ve put at least 10,000 rounds. I also carry a Gen 5 Glock 19 as duty gun.

So, the feel of the gun is very familiar. The presentation, quite different.

At seven yards, the Holosun and Glock did well. I shot relatively quickly, as I said, looking for “good enough” accuracy and gaining familiarity with the new interface/sight picture. The last hundred rounds included four different types of ammunition, both ball, and Federal HST124 grain hollowpoint. The last hundred rounds were perfectly reliable.

IMG_3092.jpeg


Final thoughts. It took about 200 rounds to break in the Brownells‘s barrel and slide because the tolerances were quite tight, and the finish is quite thick. I had to fit both the Trijicon rear dovetail sight as well as the Holosun red dot optic because of that finish thickness. All new slide parts meant that the trigger pull was slightly heavier than it was on the well broken in slide, including the lightly polished firing pin safety plunger of the old slide. So, next time it gets cleaned, I will lightly polish that part on the new slide.

Now, broken in, it is reliable. Compared with other RMR cut slides and barrels on the market, I thought Brownells was a good bargain. At $100, it was a great deal. I am about $500 all in - Holosun, slide, barrel, and slide parts kit. If I had known how much the red dot would obscure the irons, I would not have wasted a good set of night sights on the slide, and simply reused an old set of Glock sights. Even with a bit of fitting, OK a lot of fitting, though, that rear dovetail is on there tight. So tight that I don’t wanna struggle through getting it back off. It will stay.

The transition to red dot for an experienced shooter, is not simple. It took me a lot longer to get used to it than I had anticipated. I own a couple of other pistols with red dots. Including my sig Sauer, P365 XL. But the Sig, as well as on the Springfield Armory Echelon, were red dots from the beginning. There was nothing to “unlearn”.

This was taking an older pistol with which I was very familiar, and changing the way I approached it.

After I cleaned it, it went back in the safe with its original slide and barrel combination. Should it be called upon when I really need it, I’m still more comfortable with the irons than I am with this new set up. But I look forward to trying the new set up some more.
 
Last edited:
Yes, Brownells seems like they are giving those away now. Not sure why. $100 for a highly good RMR slide is a steal. I had a G17-sized one on a Polymer80 frame and thought it was a nice piece but the Brownells-branded parts kit I installed in it was garbage. You're right, the finish is very nice but also thick and needed some break-in. I put a Holosun 507C on mine but didn't have the same issues you did.

What brand slide parts did you use?
 
Yes, Brownells seems like they are giving those away now. Not sure why. $100 for a highly good RMR slide is a steal. I had a G17-sized one on a Polymer80 frame and thought it was a nice piece but the Brownells-branded parts kit I installed in it was garbage. You're right, the finish is very nice but also thick and needed some break-in. I put a Holosun 507C on mine but didn't have the same issues you did.

What brand slide parts did you use?
A kit that Brownells was offering. It was about $50 when I bought it.


“Billet firing pin” was advertised and the safety plunger appeared to be billet as well.

So, I should be concerned about the quality of that kit, then?
 
No, that seems a whole lot nicer than the branded parts kit they used to sell. Hopefully they sourced a new supplier.

The one I bought was years ago and was VERY cheesy. The plastics were cheap, the guide rod was soft, the recoil spring was oversized, and the striker had a pronounced MIM molding seam right down the middle and the halves were uneven. But it was like $35 and the only thing available at the time then so it was pretty much my only option.
 
@Astro14 , would you be able to present the Gen5 and be on target as expected right now?
Oh yeah. No doubt.

My previous duty weapon was the H&K USP Compact in .40S&W.

Transitioned to the Glock 19 last year. But this thread is about my personal Glock 19, and fundamentally, they're the same. Same grip angle, same feel. In fact, the night sights I installed on my personal 19 were identical to those on the duty 19, so that either gun would serve as good training.


I've done a few hundred draws from the same Safariland holster set-up we had for the H&K. I'm very familiar with the Glock 19.

I qualified last week, down in Charlotte, NC, and I was pleased with my shooting that day. Under tight timing, from the hip, strong hand only, support hand only, both hands from ready pistol and both hands in a normal stance - center mass and head shots - with emergency reloads, all went very well. Not bragging, but I had the best target, by far.

I had been shooting this Glock with its Trijicon sights for a while as practice. Sure, I shoot other guns, but the G19 came out at least once a month, just to keep the feel. My local range is OK with me drawing from the holster and other things they normally prohibit if there is no one else on the range.

But there is always someone else on the range.

So, draw, present, trigger squeeze, all done dry fire at home. Reloads - done at home. Interestingly, on the reloads, we are encouraged to "slingshot" the slide. Same as we do when loading and making ready. But 20 years ago, I learned to use the slide lever on the H&K, and now, it's muscle memory. Mag in, hit the slide release, present, and start making trigger contact before I even think about it. I can't seem to unlearn that technique when under pressure for time.
 
I’ve owned my Glock 19 for many years. Over a decade. A Gen 3.

It’s been a reliable, trouble, free gun, and the only change/upgrade/modification that it has ever had is an upgrade to Trijicon night sights.

Several months ago, Brownell’s had their Glock 19 RMR cut slide on sale for about $100. I bought one, along with a Brownells barrel and new internal slide parts. New recoil spring assembly as well.

This weekend, I installed a new set of sights on the Brownells slide, assembled the internals, and mounted a Holosun 507C. Yesterday, I took it to the range.

View attachment 216961

View attachment 216962

The Holosun has a choice of reticle - a dot, dot and ring, or just ring.

So, some observations. The Brownells slide, comes with a very slick, and somewhat thick, finish. It’s black, feels like DLC. The finish obstructed the firing pin hole, and I had to clean that out with a pick. Fitting the Holosun was also a challenge, I could fit a Trijicon, though it was tight, but the Holosun just wouldn’t fit. There was not enough room between the screw posts and the rear of the cut.

I tried to remove just a tiny bit of the finish on the rear of the cut. But even a diamond stone, which I use for sharpening woodworking tools like chisels, did not make much of a difference. The finish is truly impressive in its hardness, if a bit thick. Knowing that I would only mount the Holosun on this slide, on this gun, I removed a few thousands of an inch of material off the rear of the sight itself, and it fit snugly, into place.

The photographs show the original slide, barrel, and sights along with the new Brownells and Holosun set up.

I find that I am much slower acquiring the red dot than I am acquiring iron sights. I think that’s because for irons, you instinctively know which way to move the pistol to get good sight alignment. Iron sights are easy for me. The red dot is quite different, and if the pistol is a few degrees muzzle high, or muzzle low, you don’t see the red dot.

I spent a few hundred rounds getting the red dot sighted in, and getting my muscle memory developed for finding it, based on grip angle and feel.

As cool as the dot and circle reticle appears, the plain red dot is better for me. I find that if I present the pistol and focus on the front site, the red dot naturally appears. The combination of the circle and dot as a reticle simply highlights the slight movement and shaking that’s present anytime I’m holding the pistol on target. I don’t notice that with sites, but with a red dot, that tiny bit of motion, that half an inch at 10 yards, is very evident, and it’s distracting.

It took a few hundred rounds for the new slide and new barrel to break in. When I had the pistol on my bench, before taking it to the range, it was difficult to cycle by hand. The lock up was super tight. At the range, I had five or six times that the pistol did not go into battery after firing a round. A slight tap forward on the slide and it went fully back into battery. There was simply too much friction with the new finish on all the parts, until a bit of wear took place. This with that new recoil spring and guide rod.

The last malfunction (failure to go into battery) was at about the 150 round mark. After that, the slide and barrel combination, were good.

I shot the last hundred rounds for accuracy, at a moderate speed, so not looking for target shooting, really, it was much more quick, accurate enough, reliability, and sight evaluation shooting. After 200 rounds previous to the last hundred, I was much more comfortable with the red dot. Again this is a gun that I have owned for a very long time and through which I’ve put at least 10,000 rounds. I also carry a Gen 5 Glock 19 as duty gun.

So, the feel of the gun is very familiar. The presentation, quite different.

At seven yards, the Holosun and Glock did well. I shot relatively quickly, as I said, looking for “good enough” accuracy and gaining familiarity with the new interface/sight picture. The last hundred rounds included four different types of ammunition, both ball, and Federal HST124 grain hollowpoint. The last hundred rounds were perfectly reliable.

View attachment 216967

Final thoughts. It took about 200 rounds to break in the Brownells‘s barrel and slide because the tolerances were quite tight, and the finish is quite thick. I had to fit both the Trijicon rear dovetail sight as well as the Holosun red dot optic because of that finish thickness. All new slide parts meant that the trigger pull was slightly heavier than it was on the well broken in slide, including the lightly polished firing pin safety plunger of the old slide. So, next time it gets cleaned, I will lightly polish that part on the new slide.

Now, broken in, it is reliable. Compared with other RMR cut slides and barrels on the market, I thought Brownells was a good bargain. At $100, it was a great deal. I am about $500 all in - Holosun, slide, barrel, and slide parts kit. If I had known how much the red dot would obscure the irons, I would not have wasted a good set of night sights on the slide, and simply reused an old set of Glock sights. Even with a bit of fitting, OK a lot of fitting, though, that rear dovetail is on there tight. So tight that I don’t wanna struggle through getting it back off. It will stay.

The transition to red dot for an experienced shooter, is not simple. It took me a lot longer to get used to it than I had anticipated. I own a couple of other pistols with red dots. Including my sig Sauer, P365 XL. But the Sig, as well as on the Springfield Armory Echelon, were red dots from the beginning. There was nothing to “unlearn”.

This was taking an older pistol with which I was very familiar, and changing the way I approached it.

After I cleaned it, it went back in the safe with its original slide and barrel combination. Should it be called upon when I really need it, I’m still more comfortable with the irons than I am with this new set up. But I look forward to trying the new set up some more.
Astro, slightly off-topic but how do you like the trigger on your Glock? I’m thinking about getting the GEN 3 I’ve heard mixed reviews on the trigger
 
Astro, slightly off-topic but how do you like the trigger on your Glock? I’m thinking about getting the GEN 3 I’ve heard mixed reviews on the trigger
No, not off-topic at all. Glock triggers are a known quantity. They are OK. Not great.

The GEN five trigger is significantly better than GEN three. I think the safety plunger was changed to a beveled shape, which reduces the amount of friction in the system. Much more crisp, less friction and grittiness, but about the same pull.

The GEN three trigger is a little bit gritty, a little bit creepy, and breaks at around 6 pounds. It has a very tactile reset. It’s a decent trigger. There are certainly people who like lighter triggers, and there are certainly better triggers out there. I have shot some with modified triggers. They aftermarket ones are nice, but most of my Glocks are tools, not target guns, so, I keep them stock. My duty gun, a GEN 5 G19, is absolutely stock, and I am required to keep it so. It's a good gun, though. In timed fire, from the holster, etc. I don't notice the trigger, there are so many bigger concerns.

Every single GEN 3 Glock can benefit from the “$.25 trigger job“. The most effective part of that is polishing the trigger bar where it interacts with the safety plunger. That’s where a lot of the friction occurs. Just smoothing that piece, without changing the angle or shape, reduces the amount of friction in the system, it lowers the trigger pulled by about a half pound, maybe even a pound, but it makes it a much smoother process.

Glocks also smooth out with use, as that, and other points of contact, break-in.

I don’t love the Glock trigger, but I don’t hate it either. My 1911s, for example have a much more crisp precise trigger. They’re a joy to shoot. They are all range/fun guns.

Glock is much more of a tool. In using the tool, the way it's intended to be used, I hardly notice the trigger.

If it were a target only gun, I might decide to spring for one of those fancy triggers.
 
Last edited:
I have a Gen5 43X and 19. I had both slides milled for the Holosun Green dot. The cost was around $450 each. I used the larger circle AND dot. After a period I transitioned to just the dot. I can honestly say that target acquisition is about the same as iron sights. Accuracy is much better.

I typically put 4 out of 5 shots in a 4" circle at 50 feet. But the big advantage is that (for me) these old eyes are corrected to see distance and the Holosuns are great in this capacity. Done with iron sights.....period.
 
No, not off-topic at all. Glock triggers are a known quantity. They are OK. Not great.

The GEN five trigger is significantly better than GEN three. I think the safety plunger was changed to a beveled shape, which reduces the amount of friction in the system. Much more crisp, less friction and grittiness, but about the same pull.

The GEN three trigger is a little bit gritty, a little bit creepy, and breaks at around 6 pounds. It has a very tactile reset. It’s a decent trigger. There are certainly people who like lighter triggers, and there are certainly better triggers out there. I have shot some with modified triggers. They aftermarket ones are nice, but most of my Glocks are tools, not target guns, so, I keep them stock. My duty gun, a GEN 5 G19, is absolutely stock, and I am required to keep it so. It's a good gun, though. In timed fire, from the holster, etc. I don't notice the trigger, there are so many bigger concerns.

Every single GEN 3 Glock can benefit from the “$.25 trigger job“. The most effective part of that is polishing the trigger bar where it interacts with the safety plunger. That’s where a lot of the friction occurs. Just smoothing that piece, without changing the angle or shape, reduces the amount of friction in the system, it lowers the trigger pulled by about a half pound, maybe even a pound, but it makes it a much smoother process.

Glocks also smooth out with use, as that, and other points of contact, break-in.

I don’t love the Glock trigger, but I don’t hate it either. My 1911s, for example have a much more crisp precise trigger. They’re a joy to shoot. They are all range/fun guns.

Glock is much more of a tool. In using the tool, the way it's intended to be used, I hardly notice the trigger.

If it were a target only gun, I might decide to spring for one of those fancy triggers.
Thanks. In California I’m limited to third generation. Fourth and fifth are off roster unless you’re willing to purchase from a private party and pay a much higher price
 
Thanks. In California I’m limited to third generation. Fourth and fifth are off roster unless you’re willing to purchase from a private party and pay a much higher price
I’ve got a couple Gen 3. G17. G19. G20. They all have the trigger bar smooth/polish. They all work flawlessly.

Gen 4 improved the recoil assembly. Slides aren’t compatible with earlier generations. Gen 5 has a couple changes in the trigger system, and a beveled front slide. I’m not a Glock guy, but from my simple perspective, the generation changes are minor in appearance and very minor in function. The Gen 4 trigger is the same feel as Gen 3. Gen 5 trigger is a bit better, but not substantially better. Finger grooves are a matter of preference. I happen to like them because they fit my hand. But I’m fine without them.

You may be “limited” but you’re limited to a good gun. I’d be very happy with a Gen 3 in the caliber of your choice.
 
I have a Gen5 43X and 19. I had both slides milled for the Holosun Green dot. The cost was around $450 each. I used the larger circle AND dot. After a period I transitioned to just the dot. I can honestly say that target acquisition is about the same as iron sights. Accuracy is much better.

I typically put 4 out of 5 shots in a 4" circle at 50 feet. But the big advantage is that (for me) these old eyes are corrected to see distance and the Holosuns are great in this capacity. Done with iron sights.....period.

I'm the same boat now. I dislike red dots (and the ACOG); but that's from my training on iron sights; I do think they're useful. I did try a friend's conceal carry 9mm and ar that has a holosun I ended up shooting more accurate with it versus iron sights (up to 50m anyways, past that I'm better with irons) so maybe I'll get one on my carry. My eyesight isn't so great anymore...getting old sucks!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top