Originally Posted By: toy4two
basically UOA lab results show its better to not change syntehtic oil every 3k miles, you actually create more engine wear by changing it that often. The parts per million of wear metals is lower if you run it longer vs. switching it out every 3k.
I've been hearing this recently. It is illogical. UNLESS and until it is determined that fresh engine oil "eats away" at engine metals until it's ability to "eat" is diminished by the degradation of the "eating" part of the formulation, I'm going to dismiss this as a recent "urban legend" that's feeding on itself. In the absence of supplemental data, I would further assume that if this were true for synthetic oil, it would also be true for conventional oil.
The only advantage of "synthetic" oil is the supposedly reduced amount of VII polymers that enable the synthetic oil to act as the multigrade it is advertised to be. That is, conventional oils shear more quickly to the base oil at operating temperatures.
I do agree that most people change their oil way more frequently than is required. I use conventional oil all the time, and have been known to change it at 5000 mile intervals because that's easy to keep track of, but more recently, while everyone's scrambling to see just how thin an oil they can run their engine on, I've switched to six month OCI's, using 10W-30 for the colder six months of the year (start temps 45F+), and SAE-30 for the warmer six months of the year (start temps 60F+).