Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
The H- and V- rated versions of the ComforTred Touring are likely different than T-rated ComforTreds (were yours the "Touring", Darris?), but even still, the ComforTred Touring hasn't shown to be a top performer in terms of traction. Here's a Tire Rack test:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/testDisplay.jsp?ttid=138
It ranked 3rd of 4 tires, scoring near the bottom in both dry and wet traction metrics. It had the longest stopping distance of the 4, wet and dry.
Instrumented tire testing is a wonderful thing. Most users can't discern between this or that tire in terms of true safety-related measurements like stopping distance. One tire may "feel nice", and "ride good", and that's okay if it's your top priority. But if you put traction and grip before a good ride, reading Tire Rack's and Consumer Reports' comparative testing will steer you in the right direction, no pun intended.
The difference between the worst wet performer in the 50-0 mph test (the Goodyear) and the best performer in the test (the Michelin) is about 25 feet. I don't consider that a trivial difference; that can be the difference between you hitting something and not.
You make some good points but besides wet braking, glancing over the results the ComfotTred seemed to be about second or first in a lot of areas. Price is also a factor.
The problem with trying to make a comparison is one brand's tire may be a low rolling resistance in one size while another brand isn't. Also the tire tests don't always keep with the changes made to the tire. This test was the Michelin Primacy MXM4 and while the Primacy in both MXM and MXV seem to test well in wet braking, unless it is a recent test of the same size, exact model, speed rating etc of the tire you're buying the test results might not be completely applicable especially where the difference was small.