please recommend a poa low saps oil mb 229.51

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: BMWTurboDzl
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
AFAIK, most of the 229.51 approved oils are a combination of group III and other oil bases. Individual components mean little. It's the final product that matters, and as long as it meets the spec, you're good to go.

I agree with this.
Though Pentosin Super Pento III is true synthetic. I can get that one locally, but I still go with M1 ESP which is combination of Group III, IV and V. For me in this case, pour point is very important as well as flash point, and M1 ESP 5W30 is very good in both.
. When did Pentosin SP3 go full syn? Doesn't appear so per their website in Germany


Last time I checked Pentosin German web site it said synthetic while others are clearly stated as HC oils.
 
Originally Posted By: riggaz
They're not PAO though I don't think

From memory I think Mobil 1 ESP 5w-30 is a PAO

No it is not, It is so called: SHC (Synthetic Hydro-cracked). In Germany it is called SHC, on other market it sold as full synthetic. Still, very good oil.
 
Originally Posted By: riggaz
They're not PAO though I don't think

Were you referring to the Motul? All 8100 & Specific range is PAO based
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: Danno
Mobil 1 M 5W-40 meets 229.51. I use it in all my 400, 3.0 Sprinters.

Not true synthetic.
I use M1 ESP 5W30, but he wants true synthetic.


I have a hard time considering M1 ESP 5W-30 as "not a true synthetic" with a VOA like this and a NOACK of 5.6%. It's a blend of GTL and esters.
 
Originally Posted By: Falcon_LS
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: Danno
Mobil 1 M 5W-40 meets 229.51. I use it in all my 400, 3.0 Sprinters.

Not true synthetic.
I use M1 ESP 5W30, but he wants true synthetic.


I have a hard time considering M1 ESP 5W-30 as "not a true synthetic" with a VOA like this and a NOACK of 5.6%. It's a blend of GTL and esters.

Well, in Germany it is sold as HC oil, so go figure. It probably has Ester, but it is predominantly Gr3. I should have my UOA today, so we will see how it hold in DI gas application.
 
Originally Posted By: Falcon_LS
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: Danno
Mobil 1 M 5W-40 meets 229.51. I use it in all my 400, 3.0 Sprinters.

Not true synthetic.
I use M1 ESP 5W30, but he wants true synthetic.


I have a hard time considering M1 ESP 5W-30 as "not a true synthetic" with a VOA like this and a NOACK of 5.6%. It's a blend of GTL and esters.


Mobil 1 ESP Formula 5w-30 is PAO based with mineral oil added as a diluent
 
Originally Posted By: SXE10
Originally Posted By: riggaz
They're not PAO though I don't think

Were you referring to the Motul? All 8100 & Specific range is PAO based


Not correct, most 8100 and specific range are group III oils, I stock them and have the msds.
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: riggaz
They're not PAO though I don't think

From memory I think Mobil 1 ESP 5w-30 is a PAO

No it is not, It is so called: SHC (Synthetic Hydro-cracked). In Germany it is called SHC, on other market it sold as full synthetic. Still, very good oil.


SHC is synthesised hydro carbons which is PAO
 
Originally Posted By: Oilmilkshake
It is not clear to me.. I want a true synthetic for. My next oil change.

Total mc3 and ineo both meet the spec.

Thanksmike

Not all Total Quartz Ineo's are PAO but all will be really good regardless of group 3, 4 or 5.

The only advantage PAO has is it's low pour point and high flash point but doesn't dilute the additives very well so usually needs to be blended with a mineral oil as a diluent.

If it's cold start fluidity you are after then PAO is the way to go but if it's low wear then a well blended group 3 will beat most, especially at the OCI's people do on here. Additive packs mix with Group 3 oils really well.

In the VW's we see in our workshop we see really low camshaft wear (PD engines) with cars that have used Castrol Edge 5w30 which is also 229.51 approved, not sure if it's he same as the US formulation though.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: riggaz
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: riggaz
They're not PAO though I don't think

From memory I think Mobil 1 ESP 5w-30 is a PAO

No it is not, It is so called: SHC (Synthetic Hydro-cracked). In Germany it is called SHC, on other market it sold as full synthetic. Still, very good oil.


SHC is synthesised hydro carbons which is PAO

On German version bottle it says: Synthetic technology NOT Full synthetic.
So why would they market their oil for German market as Synthetic technology and on other markets as Full synthetic?
There is no doubt that oil contains synthetic base oils, but predominant base oil is still GroupIII.
They advertise Mobil1 0W40 same, SHC oil, and it is predominantly GroupIII oil.
 
Originally Posted By: riggaz
Originally Posted By: SXE10
Originally Posted By: riggaz
They're not PAO though I don't think

Were you referring to the Motul? All 8100 & Specific range is PAO based


Not correct, most 8100 and specific range are group III oils, I stock them and have the msds.


Post them up if you have them please.
 
I though you referred your post to me.
My point when it comes to my UOA (I did it also on M1 0W40 in February) was that for High-SAPS oil, TBN of 2.6 after 5K is not really that good. Considering report (which showed no indication of even moderate wear) I would say it is oil.
However, it could be that gas in CO is that bad that oil cannot retain TBN.
I just posted UOA on M15W30 Low-SAPS, and after 3K TBN was at 2.9, which is OK considering it is Low-SAPS oil.
On other hand, OP could do longer OCI< but considering that CA has less sulphur in gas, I think OP would not have any problems running M1 5W30 ESP for 5K.
 
Originally Posted By: SXE10
Originally Posted By: riggaz
Originally Posted By: SXE10
Originally Posted By: riggaz
They're not PAO though I don't think

Were you referring to the Motul? All 8100 & Specific range is PAO based


Not correct, most 8100 and specific range are group III oils, I stock them and have the msds.


Post them up if you have them please.


My MSDS's are on paper, obviously there are about 20 OEM specific and 8100 oils so that would be a mission but if you go onto the Motul.com and go into the product you want to check and click on the MSDS link they'll ask you for your email etc and send it to you. Some are PAO but most aren't, usually so the add pack dilutes better.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: riggaz
Mobil 1 ESP Formula 5w-30 is PAO based with mineral oil added as a diluent


Not that I don't trust this information given the VOA, but mind if I ask the source?
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: Falcon_LS
I have a hard time considering M1 ESP 5W-30 as "not a true synthetic" with a VOA like this and a NOACK of 5.6%. It's a blend of GTL and esters.

Well, in Germany it is sold as HC oil, so go figure. It probably has Ester, but it is predominantly Gr3. I should have my UOA today, so we will see how it hold in DI gas application.


German law is very strict where identifying what is "synthetic" and what is not is concerned. PAO is defined as synthetic by law, but GTL isn't for instance.

If this really is a blend of GTL (Group III+) and esters (Group V), and if there's no PAO in it, it will not be classed as synthetic by German law.
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: riggaz
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: riggaz
They're not PAO though I don't think

From memory I think Mobil 1 ESP 5w-30 is a PAO

No it is not, It is so called: SHC (Synthetic Hydro-cracked). In Germany it is called SHC, on other market it sold as full synthetic. Still, very good oil.


SHC is synthesised hydro carbons which is PAO

On German version bottle it says: Synthetic technology NOT Full synthetic.
So why would they market their oil for German market as Synthetic technology and on other markets as Full synthetic?
There is no doubt that oil contains synthetic base oils, but predominant base oil is still GroupIII.
They advertise Mobil1 0W40 same, SHC oil, and it is predominantly GroupIII oil.


You have to take what's on the can with a pinch of salt sometimes as it's quite common to have oils listed as semi synthetic/synthetic technology indicating a mineral oil/synthetic blend and it's actually full synthetic in the can, Shell Helix AX7 AF is an example of this.

The Mobilube SHC 75w-90 transmission oil is PAO but as you can see contains the phrase SHC

when you look at Mobil msds's they list it like an ingredient list with the biggest first and PAO listed as synthetic base oil and group 3 synthetic as highly refined mineral oil

There are advantages to using group 3's over PAO so I've got no probs using them,PAO's don't have very good load carrying ability, less than a mineral oil I think, it's just got very good cold fluidity and high temp low deposit performance

If you read the blurb on this you'll see that Mobil mean synthetic hydrocarbon when they say SHC

http://www.mobilindustrial.com/ind/english/files/synthetic-lubricants-mobil-shc-800-series.pdf

"SHC synthetic technology" may just be a marketing term for a blend of PAO and group 3 synthetic which Mobil 1 0w40 now is and they've decided to roll that term out to all Mobil 1 products but with a synthetic base oil listing in the msds and -45'C pour point the Mobil 1 ESP 5w-30 is PAO.
 
Last edited:
Quote:
SHC is synthesised hydro carbons which is PAO

Quote:
On German version bottle it says: Synthetic technology NOT Full synthetic.
So why would they market their oil for German market as Synthetic technology and on other markets as Full synthetic?
There is no doubt that oil contains synthetic base oils, but predominant base oil is still GroupIII.
They advertise Mobil1 0W40 same, SHC oil, and it is predominantly GroupIII oil.


Quote:
You have to take what's on the can with a pinch of salt sometimes as it's quite common to have oils listed as semi synthetic/synthetic technology indicating a mineral oil/synthetic blend and it's actually full synthetic in the can, Shell Helix AX7 AF is an example of this.

The Mobilube SHC 75w-90 transmission oil is PAO but as you can see contains the phrase SHC

when you look at Mobil msds's they list it like an ingredient list with the biggest first and PAO listed as synthetic base oil and group 3 synthetic as highly refined mineral oil

There are advantages to using group 3's over PAO so I've got no probs using them,PAO's don't have very good load carrying ability, less than a mineral oil I think, it's just got very good cold fluidity and high temp low deposit performance

If you read the blurb on this you'll see that Mobil mean synthetic hydrocarbon when they say SHC

http://www.mobilindustrial.com/ind/english/files/synthetic-lubricants-mobil-shc-800-series.pdf

"SHC synthetic technology" may just be a marketing term for a blend of PAO and group 3 synthetic which Mobil 1 0w40 now is and they've decided to roll that term out to all Mobil 1 products but with a synthetic base oil listing in the msds and -45'C pour point the Mobil 1 ESP 5w-30 is PAO.

Let me try to understand this:
Mobil1 was selling few years ago Full Synthetic oils in Germany (advertised as full synthetic) and now they are selling it as SHC as marketing trick? And that happened when they moved from majority PAO stock. Interesting.
I am constantly saying, M1 ESP has inside synthetic base oils, but it is combination of GRIII and either PAO or Ester, probably Easter, considering pour point and flash point (+254c) as well as TAN (2.22) and extremely low NOACK.
But, predominant base stock is GRIII (whatever Mobil1 is using).
So Mobil1 is selling their oils as Full Synthetic in all other EU countries (ESP is made in Finland) but only in Germany they are using SHC marketing trick. Yeah right.
Do not get me wrong. I am not saying oil is bad, I am using it, but it is predominantly GRIII.
On other hand, Pentosin Super Pento III is predominantly PAO oil, but on paper not as good as Mobil1.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: edyvw

Quote:
SHC is synthesised hydro carbons which is PAO

Quote:
On German version bottle it says: Synthetic technology NOT Full synthetic.
So why would they market their oil for German market as Synthetic technology and on other markets as Full synthetic?
There is no doubt that oil contains synthetic base oils, but predominant base oil is still GroupIII.
They advertise Mobil1 0W40 same, SHC oil, and it is predominantly GroupIII oil.


Quote:
You have to take what's on the can with a pinch of salt sometimes as it's quite common to have oils listed as semi synthetic/synthetic technology indicating a mineral oil/synthetic blend and it's actually full synthetic in the can, Shell Helix AX7 AF is an example of this.

The Mobilube SHC 75w-90 transmission oil is PAO but as you can see contains the phrase SHC

when you look at Mobil msds's they list it like an ingredient list with the biggest first and PAO listed as synthetic base oil and group 3 synthetic as highly refined mineral oil

There are advantages to using group 3's over PAO so I've got no probs using them,PAO's don't have very good load carrying ability, less than a mineral oil I think, it's just got very good cold fluidity and high temp low deposit performance

If you read the blurb on this you'll see that Mobil mean synthetic hydrocarbon when they say SHC

http://www.mobilindustrial.com/ind/english/files/synthetic-lubricants-mobil-shc-800-series.pdf

"SHC synthetic technology" may just be a marketing term for a blend of PAO and group 3 synthetic which Mobil 1 0w40 now is and they've decided to roll that term out to all Mobil 1 products but with a synthetic base oil listing in the msds and -45'C pour point the Mobil 1 ESP 5w-30 is PAO.

Let me try to understand this:
Mobil1 was selling few years ago Full Synthetic oils in Germany (advertised as full synthetic) and now they are selling it as SHC as marketing trick? And that happened when they moved from majority PAO stock. Interesting.
I am constantly saying, M1 ESP has inside synthetic base oils, but it is combination of GRIII and either PAO or Ester, probably Easter, considering pour point and flash point (+254c) as well as TAN (2.22) and extremely low NOACK.
But, predominant base stock is GRIII (whatever Mobil1 is using).
So Mobil1 is selling their oils as Full Synthetic in all other EU countries (ESP is made in Finland) but only in Germany they are using SHC marketing trick. Yeah right.
Do not get me wrong. I am not saying oil is bad, I am using it, but it is predominantly GRIII.
On other hand, Pentosin Super Pento III is predominantly PAO oil, but on paper not as good as Mobil1.


I think you may have misunderstood what I have said

SHC means Synthetic HydroCarbons which is PAO, it's what ExxonMobil mean when they say "SHC"

On the bottles in Germany it says "SHC synthetic technology" which sounds like a marketing term to me. If SHC meant synthetic hydrocracked then the term would be saying "synthetic hydrocracked synthetic hydrocracked" since synthetic technology means hydrocracked synthetic oil, it just would not make sense grammatically.

It would be similar to the Spielberg film "E.T the extra terrestrial" E.T. stands for extra terrestrial, so essentially the title of the film means "Extra Terrestrial, the extra terrestrial", silly.

Shell and Mobil have been trying to "globalise" their oil products for the past couple of years so I'm thinking that they've come up with the "SHC Synthetic Technology" term to put on all their premium Mobil 1 products rather than have Full Synthetic on one bottle and Synthetic Technology on another.

I've stocked 208 ltr barrels of Mobil 1 ESP 5w30 in the past which was confirmed by Mobil as PAO, as well as their Mobil Formula V 5w-30 which is sold as a different formulation but it's the same oil with the same specs as ESP just without so many approvals.

ExxonMobil are the biggest producers of PAO on earth so it makes sense for them to use it.

Mobil 1 ESP 5w-30 is not a GIII/Ester blend
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top