Originally Posted By: bigjl
Originally Posted By: bluesubie
The first response on Scoobynet was a question related to 15W-50. It was not a recommendation for a particular application. If you read a bit more, you'll see that Oilman advocates more use of 5W-40 lately.
Thermo - A lot of the UK Scooby "specialists" have their head in the sand about oil. They will say that a 0W-40 or 5W-40 is too thin, while a 10W-40 is good because it is thick. As you know, these grades are all a 40 weight at operating temp and few probably even realize the cold cranking temp to get the 0, 5, or 10W rating.
Notice the uoa's on 40 weights in this thread and the lack of uoa's on 50 weights. I'll patiently wait for some data on those viscosities while we continue to
-Dennis
P.S. - This is only two random uoa's, and not a trend, but here's a uoa on a tracked WRX running a 40 weight and then a 50 weight.
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=375446&referrerid=767
Whatever.
You are basically saying that respected motorsport specialists with a long history of success in competition are wrong simply because they are not from North America.
I do live people on this board who belittle any opinion other than one they agree with and have I have noticed that some find it difficult to accept any opinion based outside the US.
I hate to say it but companies like RCM have been specialising in turbo SubRus as far back as the early ninties, actually when did they start to sell Turbo Subarus in the US?
As far as I am concerned feel free to put 0w20 in you STi or WRX if that makes you feel better I shall continue to advocate following well respected specialists advise if that is OK with you.
How long have you been a specialist in tuned Subarus and Mitsubishis bluesubie?
And do you really think there hasn't been a period of R&D performed prior to these published oil recommendations?
I assume you know better than STi , Zero Sports and any other Subaru specialists in Japan aswell.
Or can we expect comments with "specialist" relating to them at a later date.
Who are these "proper American specialists" that you deem superior?
I think you need to consider companies such as Prodrive, McClaren and all the other motorsport companies based in the UK, or are these "specialists" as you have pointed out in your previous post.
And I will take the opinion of RCM and ScoobyClinic over Opie if you don't mind, helpful though Oilman is he is also just trying to sell product.
Not going to read the entire thread on Scoobynet but the bits I have read seem to relate to non tuned and non STi models.
You are aware that the Classic shape Impreza isn't exactly the same as the newer models, and that UK Classic models only had around 200bhp standard and Japanese WRX Classic shapes had 260/280bhp.
I think your knowledge of Subarus may be more limited than you think it is.
Feel free to post up details of your "US specialists" for us to browse
Who is the one that inferred UK Subaru specialists are better simply because they have been building WRX's longer than the specialists in the UK? The WRX wasn't the first turbo Subaru here.
You mention that I shouldn't believe everything that I read on Scoobynet and that SIDC is better. I scanned through the SIDC forum and saw recommendations for everything from 5W-30 to 10W-60. As I mentioned above, it's best to follow the builder's recommendation for viscosity. Do you know the details of the OP's build? Do you know whether or not he's driving a classic shape?
A couple of us have at least posted a little data to back up our recommendations.
-Dennis