Originally Posted By: Diesel1
Thats your response? I give you the history of something, and thats all you can say? well what do you have questions about? o.o and the amen thing is who are you giving praise to? Ethanol isnt really all that bad since it is renewable. The problem is how we go about it. We're lucky to have the oil supplies we have, so look at the facts.
1 - your post made zero sense to me and others too I may add. I said HUH? because I had no clue what your point was.
2 - I was praising Congress for not making things worse for us by allowing the EPA to force E15 on us. E10 is bad enough
3 - I am not morally against ethanol but I do not feel it's use as a blend additive/extender makes any sense. It also comes with it's share of problems such as shorter life span than gas, moisture issues, and it can grow a funky algea like substance when left in a tank for a while. It returns lower fuel economy as well. Ethanol is not a perfect fuel by any stretch and IMO as an additive/extender it is a flop.
Using small amounts of ethanol in our fuel is expensive( cost more for E10 than 100% gas ), impacts food crops, and reduces fuel economy. I don't see how going to E15 which would reduce fuel economy further and raise the price of the fuel further is a good thing for any of us? Many vehciles on the road not to mention boats, motorcycles, ATV's, snowmobiles, etc... can not run it.
If ethanol is the answer then we need to find a way to do so similar to Brazil where ethanol is the primary fuel used and not just an additive/extender to regular gas, we need to also lower the cost of producing it and the impact of doing so on food prices, and we need to get vehicles on the road that can run it at or near 100%.
IMO telling the EPA no on E15 is a great thing for our country. I wish they would have told them no to E10. I lost 2 MPG when that crud showed up here.