Originally Posted By: wrcsixeight
Lots of the RG-6 cabling, the central conductor is copper clad steel.
Not sure how much better solid copper would be, but some cables are advertised with solid copper conductors and I presume there would be less signal loss. All cables are shielded, some are just better than others. If there is little interference from nearby wiring or devices than the quad shielding might not be needed, but it does not seem to be much more $$, so why not.
Without getting into too much technical detail, the center conductor doesn't need to be solid copper due to the skin effect at high frequencies. Coax is not just 'wire', but transmission line. More like a waveguide.
The "QS" isn't to keep outside interference out but more to keep the signal "in", i.e. to contain it within the transmission line.
This is also why microwave circuits use waveguides, resonant cavities, feedhorns, etc. They wouldn't work with just regular 'wire' as we think of it.
So when receiving TV OTA RG-58 or 59 is way too lossy and splitters, amps, taps, etc. designed for it don't have sufficient bandwidth. You need RG-6QS preferably, smooth bends in the cable, no shield showing at terminations, splitters, amps & taps have to be designed for higher frequencies, have the correct impedances, etc. for optimal signal transmission and minimal loss.
Lots of the RG-6 cabling, the central conductor is copper clad steel.
Not sure how much better solid copper would be, but some cables are advertised with solid copper conductors and I presume there would be less signal loss. All cables are shielded, some are just better than others. If there is little interference from nearby wiring or devices than the quad shielding might not be needed, but it does not seem to be much more $$, so why not.
Without getting into too much technical detail, the center conductor doesn't need to be solid copper due to the skin effect at high frequencies. Coax is not just 'wire', but transmission line. More like a waveguide.
The "QS" isn't to keep outside interference out but more to keep the signal "in", i.e. to contain it within the transmission line.
This is also why microwave circuits use waveguides, resonant cavities, feedhorns, etc. They wouldn't work with just regular 'wire' as we think of it.
So when receiving TV OTA RG-58 or 59 is way too lossy and splitters, amps, taps, etc. designed for it don't have sufficient bandwidth. You need RG-6QS preferably, smooth bends in the cable, no shield showing at terminations, splitters, amps & taps have to be designed for higher frequencies, have the correct impedances, etc. for optimal signal transmission and minimal loss.