With all the changes and buy outs that have hit oil filter manufacturing the last couple of years, I started looking around and like many here became interested in the Premium Guard filters. I was looking at their site today and noticed a few things I found interesting.
First of all, Premium Guard actually posts "flow rates" for their filters on their site, most manufacturers don't. I've been looking at two sizes that fit my Mustang, the 241 series (Fram 3614 equivalents) and the 195 series (Fram 3600 equivalents).
For the standard paper cellulose media PG241, flow rate is listed at 15l (3.96 gallons) per minute. For the larger filter PG195 with the same paper cellulose media, the flow rate is listed at 20l (5.28 gallons) per minute. A significant difference in stated flow rate, and the only difference between the filters is the media area. However if you jump to the synthetic blend media extended use series, both the PG241EX and the PG195EX are listed to flow the same at 7.93 gallons per minute for both, which is significantly more than either of the paper cellulose filters of the same size.
The take away: According to Premium Guard there is a difference in flow affected by filter size for paper cellulose, but not their synthetic blend, and in spite of higher efficiency for the synthetic blend it flows better than paper cellulose does. (The standard filter is claimed to have 93% efficiency at 25 microns, the synthetic blend 99% at 25 microns.)
Common thinking here is a positive displacement oil pump will achieve what it needs to with any filter, and I've long subscribed to that myself, but these variations in the published flow rates by the manufacturer are thought provoking. Is it possible the paper cellulose or other poorly flowing filters end up going into bypass much more frequently since the pump is going to get the oil through anyway? Is flow actually "a thing" with oil filters after all?
I did not yet research other sizes for further comparison, that could be enlightening as well.
Link to the site:
Premium Guard Filters
First of all, Premium Guard actually posts "flow rates" for their filters on their site, most manufacturers don't. I've been looking at two sizes that fit my Mustang, the 241 series (Fram 3614 equivalents) and the 195 series (Fram 3600 equivalents).
For the standard paper cellulose media PG241, flow rate is listed at 15l (3.96 gallons) per minute. For the larger filter PG195 with the same paper cellulose media, the flow rate is listed at 20l (5.28 gallons) per minute. A significant difference in stated flow rate, and the only difference between the filters is the media area. However if you jump to the synthetic blend media extended use series, both the PG241EX and the PG195EX are listed to flow the same at 7.93 gallons per minute for both, which is significantly more than either of the paper cellulose filters of the same size.
The take away: According to Premium Guard there is a difference in flow affected by filter size for paper cellulose, but not their synthetic blend, and in spite of higher efficiency for the synthetic blend it flows better than paper cellulose does. (The standard filter is claimed to have 93% efficiency at 25 microns, the synthetic blend 99% at 25 microns.)
Common thinking here is a positive displacement oil pump will achieve what it needs to with any filter, and I've long subscribed to that myself, but these variations in the published flow rates by the manufacturer are thought provoking. Is it possible the paper cellulose or other poorly flowing filters end up going into bypass much more frequently since the pump is going to get the oil through anyway? Is flow actually "a thing" with oil filters after all?
I did not yet research other sizes for further comparison, that could be enlightening as well.
Link to the site:
Premium Guard Filters