Originally Posted By: Pop_Rivit
Yikes. $100 per month is more than my entire monthly electric bill for both the house and the shop.
We have an antenna that we use to get the local news on the occasion that we watch it. Beyond that I have no use for the idiot box, and as badly done as the news broadcasts have become, if I had to pay for them I wouldn't have them either.
To top it off my guess is that you have dozens of channels that you never watch, yet you're forced to pay for them every month as part of a "package". In other words, they're shoved down your throat by the cable/satellite company.
Is it any wonder that most people are disgusted by cable and satellite providers?
I don't think you really understand where the "package" requirement comes from, as it isn't as much the fault of the cable/satellite provider as it is the TV networks which own and sell the programming to those providers, and force them to purchase a "package" of channels in order to get rights to a specific one. Say, ESPN, which alone is the most expensive channel, but which also forces the provider to buy a [censored] of shovelware channels as well, just to get it. Assigning blame to the TV provider is largely misplaced.