2021 Chevy Duramax L5P - 21,900 miles/503 hours on oil - 43,400 total miles/997 total hours - HPL 5w-40

wwillson

Staff member
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
6,835
Location
Colorado
This oil sample has a total of 21,900 miles and 503 hours on the oil. I had intended to pull a sample at 20,000 miles, but the truck needed to do real work, so the oil change had to wait. Almost all miles since the last UOA have been pulling tall and heavy. The average fuel consumption is right at 9 MPG, so the engine is working hard. I try to manage the EGTs, but there are times when you have to take what you get. The oil consumption in the last 6,450 miles is 1 quart for a total of 2.75 quarts consumed in the last 21,900 miles. The total make-up oil with oil filter changes is 3 quarts.

This analysis shows the Fe rate at 6.0ppm/1k miles. The trend is higher in the last UOA, but virtually all of the 6,450 miles is pulling. The viscosity has increased from 14.4 to 15.2 which is acceptable. The corrected oxidation is 7, which is far below Wearcheck's condemnation value of 25. The soot is 0.8%, which is also acceptable. Cu decreased and Si didn't increase, could these be lab errors? TBN is still 13.38 I'd say that's still serviceable :) I will change the filter and cut it to see what was caught.

Would you change this oil? If so, why?

Previous UOA:

Sample InformationOil Changed
Sample Date6/23/202107/17/20218/24/20214/4/20227/1/20228/10/20221/18/20234/17/20238/16/2023
Machine Age miles2,5002,7008,90016,00021,50021,55031,30037,00043,400
Oil Age miles2,5002006,40013,50019,000509,75015,45021,900
Machine Time hours5562214350495496734882997
Oil Time hours5571522954401239387503
Filter Age miles2,5002006,4007,1004,000505,0009,8008,400
Oil ChangedYesNoNoNoYesNoNoNo
Filter ChangedYesNoYesYesYesNoYesYesYes
Make-up oil0001.5 qts2.5(+1)012(+1)3(+1)
BrandFactoryHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPL
Viscosity15w-405w-40 CK-45w-40 CK-45w-40 CK-45w-40 CK-45w-40 CK-45w-40 CK-45w-40 CK-45w-40 CK-4
Wear Metals
Iron1243667102166185132
Chromium<1<1234<1224
Nickel<100<10<1<1<11
Titanium<1<1<1<1<10<100
Silver3<1<1<1<1<1<1<10
Aluminum<1015131438913
Lead612431202
Copper109288518820329185197158
Tin610662222
Vanandium<100<1<1<1<10<1
Additives
Boron1201512216314170
Barium<100000404
Molybdenum2514450504537541469574603
Manganese<1<1<112<1222
Magnesium67299596810089249138311001936
Calcium126024392414255724592375211127222606
Phosphorus1000109910291064981973847968916
Zinc115511791148128512331159107812921256
Contaminants
Silicon873348465418212727
Sodium7533525810
Potassium1124355596162130
Fuel %<1<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0
GlycolNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEG
Soot%0.10.10.40.60.80.20.60.70.8
Fluid Condition
TBN8.5514.913.313.710.813.913.7612.8613.38
Viscosity13.914.513.814.9714.514.414.514.515.2
Oxidation (normalized)0(40.6)2.5(43.1)3.5(44.1)7(47.6)
 
Last edited:
You just aren't playing around! Getting your money's worth would be an understatement.

Here's my 2c...

You can probably ignore the TBN since it appears it will not be the downfall of this oil & would probably be something else that ends it. Sodium trended up & then came back down then ticked up slightly. Is it burning it up, is it being deposited in some crack, watered down from adding oil? who knows but it's trended down overall & is now at a decent level.

Boron is 0 & I think it's an additive that gets depleted but you've been adding oil so not sure why it shows 0. 🤷‍♂️

Iron IMO keep it under 200 PPM I personally wouldn't run anything that far but that is your call. Al is low. Viscosity doing well. It may be the iron load, Copper Load, or Silicon that limits this oil but I don't think its quite there yet. I do think the Copper is high but I don't know enough to make a judgment on that. I concur with the other great leads of this board... Motor on my friend. 50k sounds like a great milestone & you are almost there. 🚗
 
at a certain point I imagine the cost of sampling outweighs the cost of a cheaper brand of oil and just changing it more frequently. But since it sounds like you are happy with the experiment side of this, I think you ought to leave the oil in there and see how far out you can go before you give up and just change the oil.
 
wwillson, the "template" you mentioned and use here is most useful !
It makes the UOA chronological progression easy to visually follow.

The neat thing about the table is that Xenforo understands how to convert a pasted spreadsheet into a table. I keep a spreadsheet and just copy and paste into my post.
 
On the chart soot seems to be consistently rising at the same rate every 10k on the oil. Black stone says less than 2 percent is ok. What level would be a cause for concern? If it stays at the same rate of increase 40k seems ok?
 
On the chart soot seems to be consistently rising at the same rate every 10k on the oil. Black stone says less than 2 percent is ok. What level would be a cause for concern? If it stays at the same rate of increase 40k seems ok?
This is an interesting question that has no clear answer, even from GM. You'll see soot condemnation levels as high as 4.5% in some over the road trucks. I have stated before that soot loading > 1% is probably going to be my limit. However, @dnewton3 has data from the Duramax engines that show little or no correlation between soot loading and wear. Maybe he will chime in on the topic of soot and provide some data.
 
This is an interesting question that has no clear answer, even from GM. You'll see soot condemnation levels as high as 4.5% in some over the road trucks. I have stated before that soot loading > 1% is probably going to be my limit. However, @dnewton3 has data from the Duramax engines that show little or no correlation between soot loading and wear. Maybe he will chime in on the topic of soot and provide some data.
Ran across this older post where he talked about bypass filtration and soot is very very small. His data showed a steady increase to 2%, a further increase 2-4%, but then parabolic increase past 5%. Very informative. thank you for answering and appreciate the knowledge.

 
Back
Top