Recent Topics
I'm looking for a 0w30 A5 B5 oil
by Marco620 - 04/08/20 11:57 PM
Does anyone put heat shrink tubing over a connector plug?
by motor_oil_madman - 04/08/20 10:39 PM
Anyone ‘excited’ for API SP/GF-6?
by addyguy - 04/08/20 10:30 PM
O'Reilly online learning for .gov email addresses
by spackard - 04/08/20 10:26 PM
Welding Helmet Fogging Up
by George7941 - 04/08/20 09:54 PM
Detroit 4-53T 2009 Ford F350 Update.:)
by A310 - 04/08/20 09:48 PM
Thoughts on CAFE standards
by otis24 - 04/08/20 09:20 PM
PUP amazon 5w-20
by Koncrete_Cam - 04/08/20 08:54 PM
Duralube Trans Shudder Fixx question
by soulburner - 04/08/20 08:36 PM
Number of Spare Magazines You Consider Adequate?
by 2015_PSD - 04/08/20 08:24 PM
Troy Bilt TB6044XP string trimmer dies when hot
by 92saturnsl2 - 04/08/20 07:18 PM
JD Yanmar deisel engine
by yankees1 - 04/08/20 07:14 PM
PQIA Looks at Leading 0W-20's
by Jackson_Slugger - 04/08/20 07:03 PM
Marine oil in a passenger car engine
by Thunderbolt - 04/08/20 06:50 PM
BG SAE 5W-30 Full Synthetic Engine Oil
by JonnySaab - 04/08/20 06:42 PM
Buying oil filters: anyone buy them online?
by 53' Stude - 04/08/20 06:03 PM
Rampage muscle truck
by gfh77665 - 04/08/20 05:57 PM
Why is exhaust stupid expensive?
by IMSA_Racing_Fan - 04/08/20 05:34 PM
Castrol magnatec 5 qts of 0w20 for $14.15
by YoungEngineer - 04/08/20 05:20 PM
New WEN 56225i First Oil Change 1 Hour
by gathermewool - 04/08/20 05:04 PM
Newest Members
Hitmang77, mpstir, LMVLS1, Jotorobi, jhoffy22
71128 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
24 registered members (4WD, Chunchula, clinebarger, CleverUserName, blufeb95, 3 invisible), 854 guests, and 19 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics303,806
Posts5,242,179
Members71,128
Most Online4,538
Jan 20th, 2020
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect #5313653 01/05/20 07:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 532
E
Egg_Head Offline OP
OP Offline
E
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 532
Good to know our friends from Stuttgart are always working in their customer's best interests:

https://www.theguardian.com/busines...-benz-vehicles-in-us-for-faulty-sunroofs

Last edited by Egg_Head; 01/05/20 07:12 AM.

1979 Garelli Rally Sport
2009 Cub Cadet LT1042
2002 BMW 540 M Sport (totaled)
2011 MB E350 4Matic wagon
1979 CJ-7
1978 K-5 Blazer 400ci
Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Egg_Head] #5313717 01/05/20 09:13 AM
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 590
MrMoody Offline
Offline
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 590
Interesting. Auto manufacturers usually let owners twist in the wind for leaking sunroofs, so this must be more serious. Pane flying off on sudden stops?


2018 Hyundai Kona 1.6T DCT
2006 Pontiac (Holden) GTO AT
2001 Pontiac Grand Prix GT 3.8 NA (beater)
2005 Toyota Matrix FWD (ultra beater)
"Fob" and "Noack" are not acronyms.
Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Egg_Head] #5313730 01/05/20 09:29 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,464
S
SLO_Town Offline
Offline
S
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,464
I bought my wife a 2006 C-class for her birthday. It was one of the biggest POS we ever owned. Drivetrain rumbling and ABS problems were never solved under warranty (in hindsight I should have lemon lawed it). Then in a period of 6 months it inhaled some plastic pieces inside the multi-stage intake manifold, which killed the right side catalytic converter. Then just weeks later the "conductor plate" in the transmission failed, resulting in the trans being stuck in 7th gear. Then the valve body had to be replaced shortly after (we were suspicious of it being bad as well, but were hoping the only problem was the conductor plate).

I spent $5.5 in repairs in a period of 3 months, only to get disgusted one afternoon trade the POS in for $6.5k when we got our E90 BMW.

Scott


03 BMW E46 330Ci ZSP (Euro Castrol 0W-30)
10 Honda Element SC (Castrol Magnatec 5W-30)
11 BMW E90 328i M-Sport (Pennzoil Euro 5W-40)
16 VW Passat VR6 3.6L SEL Premium (Euro Castrol 0W-40)
Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: SLO_Town] #5313822 01/05/20 11:37 AM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 973
L
loneryder Offline
Offline
L
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 973
06 and early 07 were bad years for MB. The v6 had been re-engineered and the new 7 sp trans had a lot of problems. Note to everyone: don't buy an 06-07 gas MB!
Of course you had no way of knowing this. Sorry you had to suffer with it.

Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: loneryder] #5313910 01/05/20 02:18 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
W
Wolf359 Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
Originally Posted by loneryder
06 and early 07 were bad years for MB. The v6 had been re-engineered and the new 7 sp trans had a lot of problems. Note to everyone: don't buy an 06-07 gas MB!
Of course you had no way of knowing this. Sorry you had to suffer with it.


Not only that, but the C class had more problems that the more expensive models like the E and S class. Although sometimes they had more expensive options like airmatic that would also been expensive to repair.

That's one nice thing about buying a used car, you can research it before you buy it. I was going to get a 2006 E-350 initially but then read about all the problems and ended up getting a 2008. It's been pretty decent in the last 5 years I've owned it.

It's too bad the article isn't clear on exactly which sunroof they're talking about. The E class came standard with a sunroof in the US, the panorama sunroof was an option.

Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Wolf359] #5313929 01/05/20 02:45 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 988
P
Pelican Offline
Offline
P
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 988
The C class was a MB in name only, it lacked most of the things that makes a MB a MB wink it is better now, but still not at the same level as the E class.

Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Pelican] #5313939 01/05/20 03:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
W
Wolf359 Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
Yeah, I was going to get a C class as a beater, but they were only 1-2k cheaper than an E class as a used car and didn't have as many options so I just got another E class car to use as a beater.

Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Wolf359] #5313949 01/05/20 03:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 23,209
T
Trav Offline
Offline
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 23,209
Yep, the E class and up are real MB cars. The A, B, and C class are crap from the get go.


ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.
Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Egg_Head] #5313953 01/05/20 03:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
W
Wolf359 Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
Ok, after checking the MB forums, it seems that the recalls only affect the cars with the sunroof and not the pano roofs so I guess I'm safe. Pano on both cars and I already checked, I'm not listed for any recalls.

Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Trav] #5313965 01/05/20 04:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,464
S
SLO_Town Offline
Offline
S
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,464
Originally Posted by Trav
Yep, the E class and up are real MB cars. The A, B, and C class are crap from the get go.

My question is why does a "high end" automotive brand sully its reputation just to achieve a lower price point? To increase sales? It seems short sighted to me, and not very German. Germany as a nation has trumpeted its engineering prowess, and then they engineer and manufacture a car with serious design and manufacturing flaws. Reputations takes decades to establish, but reputations can be ruined far more quickly.

Scott

PS One thing about our C-class - it didn't have enough suspension travel. How can that not be vetted during the design process? It's not complicated.


03 BMW E46 330Ci ZSP (Euro Castrol 0W-30)
10 Honda Element SC (Castrol Magnatec 5W-30)
11 BMW E90 328i M-Sport (Pennzoil Euro 5W-40)
16 VW Passat VR6 3.6L SEL Premium (Euro Castrol 0W-40)
Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: SLO_Town] #5313983 01/05/20 04:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
W
Wolf359 Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
Originally Posted by SLO_Town
Originally Posted by Trav
Yep, the E class and up are real MB cars. The A, B, and C class are crap from the get go.

My question is why does a "high end" automotive brand sully its reputation just to achieve a lower price point? To increase sales? It seems short sighted to me, and not very German. Germany as a nation has trumpeted its engineering prowess, and then they engineer and manufacture a car with serious design and manufacturing flaws. Reputations takes decades to establish, but reputations can be ruined far more quickly.

Scott

PS One thing about our C-class - it didn't have enough suspension travel. How can that not be vetted during the design process? It's not complicated.


You forget that during your time of ownership that they were also owners of Chrysler which they got rid of in 2007. BMW also did the same with the 3 series. It's just part of GM's playbook which they've had for a long while. You start out with a Chevy and can stay loyal to their brand by having more expensive cars to buy. The C class was an entry level car and they have other models to step up to later.

Yeah, one drawback of the sports crazy is lack of suspension travel. I've always railed against bigger rims and lower profile tires. But automakers will just give whatever the market demands. And somehow the fools who like low profile tires and lowered cars because it's supposed to yield better handling have won out. Yet the percentage of people who can actually take advantage of those features are probably in the single digits.

Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Egg_Head] #5314001 01/05/20 04:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 24,123
Mr Nice Offline
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 24,123
Wolf,

I agree with you the big wheel/tire combo on low performance vehicles is silly and expensive.


Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: SLO_Town] #5314018 01/05/20 05:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 988
P
Pelican Offline
Offline
P
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 988
Originally Posted by SLO_Town

My question is why does a "high end" automotive brand sully its reputation just to achieve a lower price point? To increase sales? It seems short sighted to me, and not very German. Germany as a nation has trumpeted its engineering prowess, and then they engineer and manufacture a car with serious design and manufacturing flaws. Reputations takes decades to establish, but reputations can be ruined far more quickly.

Scott

PS One thing about our C-class - it didn't have enough suspension travel. How can that not be vetted during the design process? It's not complicated.


Right on Scott, I've asked myself the same question, but I think the answer is Chrysler was contagious and MB got in spades! All that mattered after the merger was the bottom line and the short sighted view guided by the stock market ruled. They almost reached rock-bottom actually one short of that. Thay've clawed their way back a lot, but they are not where they used to be. Who knows if they'll ever be that again.

Last edited by Pelican; 01/05/20 05:12 PM.
Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: Wolf359] #5314106 01/05/20 06:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,656
M
maxdustington Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,656
Originally Posted by SLO_Town
I spent $5.5 in repairs in a period of 3 months, only to get disgusted one afternoon trade the POS in for $6.5k when we got our E90 BMW.
Not bad, less than a round trip bus fare.
Originally Posted by Wolf359
Yeah, one drawback of the sports crazy is lack of suspension travel. I've always railed against bigger rims and lower profile tires. But automakers will just give whatever the market demands. And somehow the fools who like low profile tires and lowered cars because it's supposed to yield better handling have won out. Yet the percentage of people who can actually take advantage of those features are probably in the single digits.
The reason for big wheels is higher belt lines to improve pedestrian safety. Cars would look hilarious with 16" wheels and 8" of wheel well gap.


99 Toyota Tercel CE 5EFE/C151
PUP 5W30/Ultra
Re: Mercedes Benz recalls 744k cars for sunroof defect [Re: maxdustington] #5314124 01/05/20 07:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
W
Wolf359 Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8,341
Originally Posted by maxdustington
Originally Posted by Wolf359
Yeah, one drawback of the sports crazy is lack of suspension travel. I've always railed against bigger rims and lower profile tires. But automakers will just give whatever the market demands. And somehow the fools who like low profile tires and lowered cars because it's supposed to yield better handling have won out. Yet the percentage of people who can actually take advantage of those features are probably in the single digits.
The reason for big wheels is higher belt lines to improve pedestrian safety. Cars would look hilarious with 16" wheels and 8" of wheel well gap.


That's exactly what they looked like 15+ years ago before this craze. The wheel well gap is to give you more suspension travel. You'd get a softer ride and less flat tires/bent/cracked rims. There's trade offs in every engineering decision. They just picked the wrong one just for looks.

The night package is crazy too, the murdered look has gone too far. Sure make the car extra black so people can't see you. You can get it now as an option.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™