Recent Topics
ATF exchange using the cooler line
by ugabulldog
16 minutes 48 seconds ago
High volume oil pumps?
by dlundblad
28 minutes 14 seconds ago
Penrite LV ATF
by toyota62
Today at 01:30 AM
Valvoline MaxLife Full Synthetic Multi-Vehicle ATF
by glmtd
Today at 12:17 AM
Kendall GT1 euro
by Bullwinkle007
Today at 12:05 AM
$14 5qt. QS 10w-40 syn blend + $5 GC - wallys
by lairdwd
Yesterday at 09:06 PM
Synthetic from dino?
by S2K
Yesterday at 08:35 PM
Voltage fluctuation 2012 Elantra
by schuylkill
Yesterday at 08:28 PM
Tranfer Case 2016 GMC Sierra 1500 6.2 8 speed
by dareo
Yesterday at 07:39 PM
Caliper slide pin questions
by ZZman
Yesterday at 07:24 PM
Perfect Afternoon with F7Fs
by Yah-Tah-Hey
Yesterday at 06:10 PM
Blending E85 to use as cleaner in non-FFV
by ltslimjim
Yesterday at 05:33 PM
01 Tahoe instrument cluster replacement question
by mjk
Yesterday at 05:25 PM
Reasonable price to pay some one to detail?
by Colt45ws
Yesterday at 05:09 PM
FCA upheaval--Marchionne ill, Jeep CEO takes over
by Carmudgeon
Yesterday at 04:42 PM
Duck Boat
by Zee09
Yesterday at 04:23 PM
What are these valves and can I use them to...
by E150GT
Yesterday at 04:06 PM
OBD Tool
by dawgn86
Yesterday at 03:31 PM
Any experience with the new FA-4 oils?
by SubaJew
Yesterday at 03:24 PM
What's the average life (in miles) of mc tires
by JeepWJ19
Yesterday at 03:00 PM
Newest Members
ppreedom, krugger, jznwhite, S2K, tweak999
65524 Registered Users
Who's Online
59 registered (2009Edge, alarmguy, BobFout, buck91, billt460, ArrestMeRedZ, 5 invisible), 1091 Guests and 33 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
65524 Members
67 Forums
287443 Topics
4795287 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#4714846 - 04/03/18 07:50 AM 87 or higher based on this?
Unearthed Offline


Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 324
Loc: USA
I have a 2018 Fusion Hybrid with 4k miles and the manual states the following:

Your vehicle is designed to operate on regular unleaded gasoline with a minimum pump (R+M)/2 octane rating of 87.
Some fuel stations, particularly those in high altitude areas, offer fuels posted as regular unleaded gasoline with an octane rating below 87.
For best overall vehicle and engine performance, premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 or higher is recommended. The performance gained by using premium fuel is most noticeable in hot weather.
Do not be concerned if the engine sometimes knocks lightly. However, if the engine knocks heavily while using fuel with the recommended octane rating, contact an authorized dealer to prevent any engine damage.


Thoughts? I never even considered filling it with 91 until I saw that today.
_________________________
2015 Civic Si
2014 VW Sportwagen
2003 Suzuki vz800

Top
#4714855 - 04/03/18 08:00 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
gregk24 Offline


Registered: 04/13/13
Posts: 5634
Loc: FL, USA
Is your engine knocking? If not I wouldn't worry about it.
_________________________
2012 Honda Accord EX-L K24z3
53,xxx miles
PPPP 0w20 / Fram Ultra

2014 VW Jetta SE 1.8T ea888
37,xxx miles
Castrol Edge 0w40 / OEM filter

Top
#4714856 - 04/03/18 08:00 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
Char Baby Offline


Registered: 05/25/05
Posts: 10086
Loc: ROCHESTER, NY
I've had owners manuals(wifes Lexus RX) that stated the same thing.
In some higher altitude states, there is octane that is 86 instead of 87. However, I have never gotten better fuel economy nor any noticeable performance gains by using higher octane 91 or 93.

Maybe, just maybe, if I paid quite close attention, I may notice a bit better throttle response but, not actual power of anything that I ever owned.

I did notice the difference in my SIL's BMW Z4 with higher octane compared to lesser octane fuel but, this 3.0i I6 is a different beast as I would think all high(er )performance cars would be.
_________________________
"Retired"
'06 Mazda 3i 2.0L-FOR SALE NOW!
********************************
'80 Firebird FORMULA V8/4bbl-purchased "NEW"
'15 Nissan Altima 2.5 SV
'15 Honda Civic LX(17K)

Top
#4714862 - 04/03/18 08:04 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: gregk24]
Unearthed Offline


Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 324
Loc: USA
Originally Posted By: gregk24
Is your engine knocking? If not I wouldn't worry about it.


This may sound stupid, but I don't know what that would sound like.
_________________________
2015 Civic Si
2014 VW Sportwagen
2003 Suzuki vz800

Top
#4714866 - 04/03/18 08:09 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
DriveHard Offline


Registered: 11/24/03
Posts: 1090
Loc: Middle of Iowa
Originally Posted By: Unearthed
Originally Posted By: gregk24
Is your engine knocking? If not I wouldn't worry about it.


This may sound stupid, but I don't know what that would sound like.


http://bfy.tw/HRmE

quick search answers your question...
_________________________
Smile, it increases your face value
2011 Silverado Crew Cab LT 6.2L/6spd
2017 Jeep Renegade Trailhawk (wife's)
2007 Nissan Xterra (trail toy)
2013 Fiat 500 Abarth (my DD)
Elio...?

Top
#4714935 - 04/03/18 09:17 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
Linctex Offline


Registered: 12/31/16
Posts: 6186
Loc: Waco, TX
As altitude increases, less atmospheric pressure is available to fill the cylinders;

Less air = less power = less need for octane
_________________________
"The evidence demands a verdict".
(Re:VOA)"it's nearly impossible to actually know the particular additives that are in there at what concentrations."

Top
#4714949 - 04/03/18 09:32 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Linctex]
Cujet Online   content


Registered: 02/15/03
Posts: 7244
Loc: Jupiter, Florida
Originally Posted By: Linctex
As altitude increases, less atmospheric pressure is available to fill the cylinders;

Less air = less power = less need for octane


True for non turbo vehicles.

However, the Ecoboost line of turbocharged engines absolutely will perform better on higher octane, regardless of altitude.
_________________________

Top
#4714951 - 04/03/18 09:33 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
mightymousetech Offline


Registered: 04/03/17
Posts: 1480
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Both of my cars are "Premium Recommended" and run like [censored] on regular. I can usually tell within minutes.

I wouldn't even think of using 87 in them.


Edited by mightymousetech (04/03/18 09:34 AM)
_________________________
Mighty Mouse Tech
BMW Tech, Former Acura Tech
2010 Civic Si Castrol 0W40, Redline MTL
2013 BMW 135i M Sport Edition Castrol 0W40, Redline MTL

Top
#4714954 - 04/03/18 09:35 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
The_Nuke Offline


Registered: 07/21/13
Posts: 319
Loc: D/FW Metroplex
Originally Posted By: Unearthed
I have a 2018 Fusion Hybrid with 4k miles and the manual states the following:

Your vehicle is designed to operate on regular unleaded gasoline with a minimum pump (R+M)/2 octane rating of 87.
Some fuel stations, particularly those in high altitude areas, offer fuels posted as regular unleaded gasoline with an octane rating below 87.
For best overall vehicle and engine performance, premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 or higher is recommended. The performance gained by using premium fuel is most noticeable in hot weather.
Do not be concerned if the engine sometimes knocks lightly. However, if the engine knocks heavily while using fuel with the recommended octane rating, contact an authorized dealer to prevent any engine damage.


Thoughts? I never even considered filling it with 91 until I saw that today.


How much of your driving, if any, is spent at WOT?

If the answer to that is 'very little' or 'hardly ever', then running the premium fuel/higher octane gasoline will be a waste of money for you.

If the answer to that question is 'all the time!' or 'every chance I get!', then your car's engine will make use of any extra octane the gas you buy contains. In that scenario, the extra money required for higher grades of gasoline will not be wasted.

Notice I stopped short of saying the extra cost would be worth it in that last statement. No one but you can say if a higher gasoline bill is going to be worth it even when you know the engine will make use of the higher octane fuel being purchased.

It's a catch-22 almost...just because your engine makes use of the higher octane gasoline during periodic passing events doesn't necessarily mean the extra cost is "worth it."

Or maybe it does; that's your call.

NOTE: not to throw sand onto the point I was trying to make here, but even if you make the decision to run the higher octane fuel, you will likely see inconsistent results with the gasoline based upon where you buy it. That has been my experience anyway. Not all premium fuels are created equal, and I have plenty of datalogs to back that claim up. Top Tier premium > non-Top Tier premium (as a general rule), and premium gasoline from a no-name place which looks a little shady is usually going to be the worst performing of them all. That's been my experience with gasoline and the varying octane ratings it comes it around here.
_________________________
2012 Dodge Charger
- R/T with pursuit pkg.
- 5.7L + A5 + 2.65
"..it's got cop tires, cop shocks, cop suspension..."

Top
#4714960 - 04/03/18 09:41 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: The_Nuke]
mightymousetech Offline


Registered: 04/03/17
Posts: 1480
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: The_Nuke
Originally Posted By: Unearthed
I have a 2018 Fusion Hybrid with 4k miles and the manual states the following:

Your vehicle is designed to operate on regular unleaded gasoline with a minimum pump (R+M)/2 octane rating of 87.
Some fuel stations, particularly those in high altitude areas, offer fuels posted as regular unleaded gasoline with an octane rating below 87.
For best overall vehicle and engine performance, premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 or higher is recommended. The performance gained by using premium fuel is most noticeable in hot weather.
Do not be concerned if the engine sometimes knocks lightly. However, if the engine knocks heavily while using fuel with the recommended octane rating, contact an authorized dealer to prevent any engine damage.


Thoughts? I never even considered filling it with 91 until I saw that today.


How much of your driving, if any, is spent at WOT?

If the answer to that is 'very little' or 'hardly ever', then running the premium fuel/higher octane gasoline will be a waste of money for you.

If the answer to that question is 'all the time!' or 'every chance I get!', then your car's engine will make use of any extra octane the gas you buy contains. In that scenario, the extra money required for higher grades of gasoline will not be wasted.

Notice I stopped short of saying the extra cost would be worth it in that last statement. No one but you can say if a higher gasoline bill is going to be worth it even when you know the engine will make use of the higher octane fuel being purchased.

It's a catch-22 almost...just because your engine makes use of the higher octane gasoline during periodic passing events doesn't necessarily mean the extra cost is "worth it."

Or maybe it does; that's your call.

NOTE: not to throw sand onto the point I was trying to make here, but even if you make the decision to run the higher octane fuel, you will likely see inconsistent results with the gasoline based upon where you buy it. That has been my experience anyway. Not all premium fuels are created equal, and I have plenty of datalogs to back that claim up. Top Tier premium > non-Top Tier premium (as a general rule), and premium gasoline from a no-name place which looks a little shady is usually going to be the worst performing of them all. That's been my experience with gasoline and the varying octane ratings it comes it around here.


It is actually more important during light acceleration at highway speeds. Very lean burn/high heat. At WOT it runs very rich, so less likely to see damage then.


Edited by mightymousetech (04/03/18 09:42 AM)
_________________________
Mighty Mouse Tech
BMW Tech, Former Acura Tech
2010 Civic Si Castrol 0W40, Redline MTL
2013 BMW 135i M Sport Edition Castrol 0W40, Redline MTL

Top
#4714963 - 04/03/18 09:44 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
PimTac Offline


Registered: 03/04/17
Posts: 4648
Loc: Soviet State of Washington
My take is that your car will run fine in 87 but not optimally. Next time you fuel up fill it with premium. If you sense no discernible difference then you have your answer. My Mazda came with 87 from the dealer but when I refueled with Shell 91 I noticed a difference right off the bat. Iíve stuck with it since. There are also reports that running higher octane fuels helps to prevent or decrease fuel dilution. So far I havenít noticed any but that is using my Mk 2 nose sensor and not a uoa.
_________________________
2017 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring

Valvoline Advanced Synthetic 0w20
Mobil 1 M108A EP filter


Top
#4715020 - 04/03/18 10:39 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
Virtus_Probi Offline


Registered: 06/25/15
Posts: 4068
Loc: New England
My FXT's manual states that 93 is recommended, 91 is fine, and down to 87 will not damage anything but the car might not run very well.
When I was throwing weird CELs not long after I bought the car, the techs at the local dealer said I had no right to come whining to them about CELs if I didn't run SHELL 93 (had to be that brand!!!)...wonder what Subaru of America would have thought of that remark. The fix was some software tweak that had nothing to do with octane.
I almost always run 93, have also tried 94 in Canada and putting about 1/3 of a tank of 100 octane racing unleaded in with 93 just for fun. Had a couple of tanks of 91 when I just couldn't find 93 up in the NH mountains...the car has pretty much always felt the same.
I'd say have a little fun with it and try premium and silver to see what you think. I know light knocking can be quite harmless, but I sure wouldn't want to run gas that made my car do it. Modern knock control systems make most cars very forgiving of octane as far as actual damage occurring.
_________________________
2014 Forester XT, 86000 miles
Last Change;
M1 5W30 d1G2
Tokyo Roki 15208AA170 filter

Top
#4715027 - 04/03/18 10:45 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Char Baby]
JLTD Offline


Registered: 12/15/17
Posts: 836
Loc: US
Originally Posted By: Char Baby

In some higher altitude states, there is octane that is 86 instead of 87. However, I have never gotten better fuel economy nor any noticeable performance gains by using higher octane 91 or 93.


I've seen 85 octane in mountain towns. The issue with filling up with lower octane at altitude is if you then go down the mountain to a lower altitude you could have an issue with detonation. IMO this is what Ford is trying to avoid. But if you're going to be in the mountains for a full tank or close to it, the lower number should be ok....note this is for NA engines only.

I have had 1 or 2 vehicles that seemed to run smoother on higher octane, but with no driving differences.


Originally Posted By: Cujet
Originally Posted By: Linctex
As altitude increases, less atmospheric pressure is available to fill the cylinders;

Less air = less power = less need for octane


True for non turbo vehicles.

However, the Ecoboost line of turbocharged engines absolutely will perform better on higher octane, regardless of altitude.


Exactly; with a turbo you want to maintain minimum octane at all times since even at higher altitudes you are still getting full sea level atmospheric pressure into the cylinders.


Edited by JLTD (04/03/18 10:49 AM)
_________________________
Hers: 2008 Jeep Liberty 135k, AMSOILģ SS 5w30/same

His: 2015 4Runner SR5 1GR-FE 39k, AMSOILģ OE 5w20/Wix

Top
#4715085 - 04/03/18 11:43 AM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Unearthed]
BrocLuno Offline


Registered: 09/06/15
Posts: 5625
Loc: Kalifornia Kollective
It all depends on where you are? Your local atmospheric conditions (higher humidity?). How you drive, as in "in it at every on ramp"? Me, I'd rather slow down if I have to, than pull out in front of somebody at speed ... AND, it depends on how your 'puter handles timing?

If it pings lightly and occasionally, you are getting all you can from a fuel grade. If it never pings even going up a steep hill, you are not advanced enough to get all MPG the motor/fuel can ...

Try a tank and see what happens ... Take note of acceleration and hill climbing ability, etc. Then decide smile
_________________________
Formerly in marine engineering. In an earlier life I owned my own petroleum tank truck, and hauled for the majors and independent's.

Top
#4715364 - 04/03/18 04:44 PM Re: 87 or higher based on this? [Re: Cujet]
Whimsey Offline


Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 4074
Loc: The Garden State
Originally Posted By: Cujet
Originally Posted By: Linctex
As altitude increases, less atmospheric pressure is available to fill the cylinders;

Less air = less power = less need for octane


True for non turbo vehicles.

However, the Ecoboost line of turbocharged engines absolutely will perform better on higher octane, regardless of altitude.


The question is how much better will the EcoBoost engine perform with 93 vs 87 octane if you don't push it constantly in your everyday driving. And how much extra are you spending per gallon for 93 octane. The extra cost is easy for me to identify, it's usually at least $0.60 a gallon. That's about $11 per 19 gallons, not cheap if your not racing or the engine doesn't absolutely require it. Last year we drove to Key West from NJ in our new 2017 2.3 EB Explorer. I used 93 octane 90% of the time and mixed 89 octane in 10% of the time. We averaged ~24 mpg. This year we're going back down and and I'm going to use 87 octane and we'll see what the mpg averages. The only time I need extra power, whether the higher octane helped is unknown, is the mountains in VA and avoiding idiots on the road. The UOA's using 93/89 vs 87 octane didn't show any difference in fuel dilution or lower flash point.

Whimsey

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >