Recent Topics
Barrett Jackson 2019 Pics
by Nick1994. 01/19/19 05:41 PM
What do y'all do with old car parts?
by qdeezie. 01/19/19 05:11 PM
Diagnosing catalytic converters.
by Tlhfirelion. 01/19/19 04:20 PM
Oil recommendations for GM Vortec 8100
by Dudemanmaximus. 01/19/19 04:14 PM
Leaf Spring Questions- Lots of Questions
by George7941. 01/19/19 04:02 PM
Am I being out of line?
by Chris142. 01/19/19 04:00 PM
Some good modern rock songs
by 53' Stude. 01/19/19 03:51 PM
06 Pathfinder O2 sensor voltage sensor 1
by Bluestream. 01/19/19 03:50 PM
Honda Blue Coolants
by redhat. 01/19/19 03:49 PM
Let's talk about some of the other NHL teams
by 53' Stude. 01/19/19 03:45 PM
coolants for 1965 imperial
by ted s. 01/19/19 03:35 PM
Where to get real Dexron III ?
by das_peikko. 01/19/19 02:40 PM
Dexcool + Prestone AMAM Mix
by George7941. 01/19/19 02:31 PM
Questions about Maverik gas
by MRtv. 01/19/19 01:25 PM
Anyone Taking Superfoods ?
by Warstud. 01/19/19 12:55 PM
Permatex High Tack (80062)
by TheLawnRanger. 01/19/19 12:29 PM
A little warm down in Oz.
by Snagglefoot. 01/19/19 12:03 PM
Supertech 6607 - 7300 miles - 2017 Legacy
by MrWideTires. 01/19/19 10:21 AM
One Of The Best F-16 Performances
by billt460. 01/19/19 09:52 AM
Newest Members
ejmiller, _THOR_, Captmorgan2112, TreadMonster, Snachlift500
66978 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
118 registered members (53' Stude, 4WD, 2K2AcuraTL, 2004tdigls, 69GTX, 15 invisible), 1,979 guests, and 39 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics296,849
Posts4,960,101
Members66,978
Most Online2,688
Jan 19th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 9 of 10 1 8 9 10
Re: Archoil products [Re: kimandsally] #3867004
09/27/15 01:41 PM
09/27/15 01:41 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
San Francisco
keesue Offline
keesue  Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
San Francisco
I used Archoil's oil additive. Of all the additives I have tried, it is the best - hands down. I noticed the difference right away.

With a newer car where the oil is changed on schedule with top tier oils, it most likely wouldn't make a bit of discernable difference. With an older engine, engineered before CNC engine machining, it has the better chance for impact. I fall into this category.

This, parenthetically for me, is where the battle lines get drawn on archoil and others: "It didn't work for me", usually they are in the first camp; "It worked for me", generally in the latter camp.

For me, Archoil works.


1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo
Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: Antisoshal] #3940758
12/08/15 12:56 PM
12/08/15 12:56 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
SR1919 Offline
SR1919  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
I am hoping that some of the users of Archoil 9300 come back to this thread and report on their UOA besides the 'feel' of the car.

Besides the high cost cost of AR9300 (around $70 per treatment in an average car engine), would there be a reason not to use it in automotive applications due to unintended 'restoration' of the engine surfaces in which the OEM clearances are compromised? Is this even possible with a product such as Archoil 9300?

It seems to me that the main focus of AR9300 is heavy equipment, industrial applications, NOT cars.

Originally Posted By: Antisoshal
Boxcart, please stop. You aren't helping on any level at this point.

Looking forward to your results Gale. I'm currently using a mix of 9100 and 9300 in my Land Rover 2.5L diesel. Since I dont have any lab grade empirical results that would survive the peer review process for publication, I wont share them other than one: The Wife Test.

The rover is a bit of a noisy and rough lummox and at highway speeds the motor noise and vibration are quite substantial. Before a 5600 mile excursion this summer I put the recommended doses of 9300 and 9100 in a fresh change of T6 (Rotella). I did not give my wife any indication something had been altered or introduced. About 4 hours into our drive my wife asked if I fixed something because it was much quieter and smoother. I had noticed as well, but since the placebo effect could be assigned to my own perception it was interesting to note that she noticed a difference as well.

Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: SR1919] #3940841
12/08/15 03:13 PM
12/08/15 03:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,486
Upper Midwest
kschachn Offline
kschachn  Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,486
Upper Midwest
Originally Posted By: SR1919
I am hoping that some of the users of Archoil 9300 come back to this thread and report on their UOA besides the 'feel' of the car.

Besides the high cost cost of AR9300 (around $70 per treatment in an average car engine), would there be a reason not to use it in automotive applications due to unintended 'restoration' of the engine surfaces in which the OEM clearances are compromised? Is this even possible with a product such as Archoil 9300?

It seems to me that the main focus of AR9300 is heavy equipment, industrial applications, NOT cars.


There's nothing in a UOA that would show the "effectiveness" of this additive, even if you had a definition of what effective meant.

And as for as restoration of engine surfaces...


1994 BMW 530i, 241K
1996 Honda Accord, 267K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 409K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 280K
Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: kimandsally] #3941201
12/08/15 10:02 PM
12/08/15 10:02 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
San Francisco
keesue Offline
keesue  Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
San Francisco
Intake track is completely clean. Never before. Ever. No crankcase blowby. No turbo blowby. Completely clean after 7K miles. Incredible...

Last edited by keesue; 12/08/15 10:03 PM.

1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo
Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: keesue] #3941223
12/08/15 10:27 PM
12/08/15 10:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
SR1919 Offline
SR1919  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
Originally Posted By: keesue
Intake track is completely clean. Never before. Ever. No crankcase blowby. No turbo blowby. Completely clean after 7K miles. Incredible...


Thanks for sharing your experience. Did you use Archoil 9300? And is your car a diesel?

Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: kschachn] #3941228
12/08/15 10:33 PM
12/08/15 10:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
SR1919 Offline
SR1919  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Originally Posted By: SR1919
I am hoping that some of the users of Archoil 9300 come back to this thread and report on their UOA besides the 'feel' of the car.

Besides the high cost cost of AR9300 (around $70 per treatment in an average car engine), would there be a reason not to use it in automotive applications due to unintended 'restoration' of the engine surfaces in which the OEM clearances are compromised? Is this even possible with a product such as Archoil 9300?

It seems to me that the main focus of AR9300 is heavy equipment, industrial applications, NOT cars.


There's nothing in a UOA that would show the "effectiveness" of this additive, even if you had a definition of what effective meant.

And as for as restoration of engine surfaces...


I was thinking more in the line of more than one UOA with and without Archoil 9300 to compare. This is assuming a similar, on the average, driving pattern between oil changes.

Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: SR1919] #3941567
12/09/15 12:04 PM
12/09/15 12:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,486
Upper Midwest
kschachn Offline
kschachn  Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,486
Upper Midwest
Originally Posted By: SR1919
I was thinking more in the line of more than one UOA with and without Archoil 9300 to compare. This is assuming a similar, on the average, driving pattern between oil changes.


OK, well let me put it this way, what parameter(s) of a UOA would you be comparing that would show effectiveness?


1994 BMW 530i, 241K
1996 Honda Accord, 267K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 409K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 280K
Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: kschachn] #3941859
12/09/15 04:43 PM
12/09/15 04:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
SR1919 Offline
SR1919  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Originally Posted By: SR1919
I was thinking more in the line of more than one UOA with and without Archoil 9300 to compare. This is assuming a similar, on the average, driving pattern between oil changes.


OK, well let me put it this way, what parameter(s) of a UOA would you be comparing that would show effectiveness?


Wear metals for example.

Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: SR1919] #3942598
12/10/15 11:21 AM
12/10/15 11:21 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,616
Iowegia - USA
MolaKule Offline
MolaKule  Offline
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,616
Iowegia - USA
Originally Posted By: SR1919
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Originally Posted By: SR1919
I was thinking more in the line of more than one UOA with and without Archoil 9300 to compare. This is assuming a similar, on the average, driving pattern between oil changes.


OK, well let me put it this way, what parameter(s) of a UOA would you be comparing that would show effectiveness?


Wear metals for example.


Not true for driveline components. As we have seen in some past UOA's, there were very few wear metals showing just before a major component failure.

A UOA, when compared to a VOA, shows how well the TBN is holding up or if there is any coolant intrusion.

One must have a VOA of any mix, so you have a baseline for comparison, or the UOA is virtually useless.


Quote:
Besides the high cost cost of AR9300 (around $70 per treatment in an average car engine), would there be a reason not to use it in automotive applications due to unintended 'restoration' of the engine surfaces in which the OEM clearances are compromised? Is this even possible with a product such as Archoil 9300?

It seems to me that the main focus of AR9300 is heavy equipment, industrial applications, NOT cars.


And what chemical components ar in Archoil that would show any tribological improvements over a good conventional or synthetic engine oil?

Last edited by MolaKule; 12/10/15 11:29 AM.

Scars remind us of where we have been, but do not have to dictate where we are going.
Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: MolaKule] #3942900
12/10/15 03:54 PM
12/10/15 03:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
SR1919 Offline
SR1919  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
[quote=SR1919][quote=kschachn][quote=SR1919]

And what chemical components ar in Archoil that would show any tribological improvements over a good conventional or synthetic engine oil?


Good question. I had to guess a combination of WS2 and borate esters maybe. I have not found a VOA for Archoil 9300 yet.

I was trying to see if those folks that have used Archoil 9300 in their cars have observed any negative effects. For example some unintended reaction with seals, leaks or anything else that can be reported.

I would say that as a start one needs the VOA of the base oil that you are going to add Archoil 9300 to and then compare it so many miles/hours/cycles later via a UOA. Also there are some forums that contain databases of UOAs for specific range of engines (TDIs, CDIs, etc.) that one can analyze and compare averages (IF for the same kind of engine).

I agree that it is not an easy way to come to compare and draw conclusions.

Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: kimandsally] #3943215
12/10/15 08:09 PM
12/10/15 08:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,486
Upper Midwest
kschachn Offline
kschachn  Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,486
Upper Midwest
Even worse than trying to interpret a wear metal number from a UOA would be trying to attribute the difference to the additive.


1994 BMW 530i, 241K
1996 Honda Accord, 267K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 409K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 280K
Re: Archoil products [Re: kimandsally] #3943378
12/11/15 12:04 AM
12/11/15 12:04 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,616
Iowegia - USA
MolaKule Offline
MolaKule  Offline
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,616
Iowegia - USA
Quote:
I would say that as a start one needs the VOA of the base oil that you are going to add Archoil 9300 to and then compare it so many miles/hours/cycles later via a UOA.


The better way would be to mix the additive with the formulated engine oil and obtain a VOA analysis of the mix. That way you have a firm and accurate baseline.


Quote:
Also there are some forums that contain databases of UOAs for specific range of engines (TDIs, CDIs, etc.) that one can analyze and compare averages (IF for the same kind of engine).


The problem with that is there are just too many variables such as:

1. different driving styles

2. different engine and driveline designs

3. different fuels,

4. different engine oil formulations,

5. different climatic conditions


Scars remind us of where we have been, but do not have to dictate where we are going.
Re: Archoil products [Re: MolaKule] #3943656
12/11/15 09:37 AM
12/11/15 09:37 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
SR1919 Offline
SR1919  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 87
TX - Texas
Yes good suggestion about getting a VOA with the Archoil additive mixed in. The tricky part is how to do it proportionally with such a small amount of additive such as the Archoil 9300 (100 ml).

In terms of the UOA database I agree that in order to minimize variability you need a as many data points as you can get and that is not always possible or practical.

In any case from a qualitative point of view I appreciate folks who come here and report back on their experience with the Archoil products such as the 9300.

Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Quote:
I would say that as a start one needs the VOA of the base oil that you are going to add Archoil 9300 to and then compare it so many miles/hours/cycles later via a UOA.


The better way would be to mix the additive with the formulated engine oil and obtain a VOA analysis of the mix. That way you have a firm and accurate baseline.


Quote:
Also there are some forums that contain databases of UOAs for specific range of engines (TDIs, CDIs, etc.) that one can analyze and compare averages (IF for the same kind of engine).


The problem with that is there are just too many variables such as:

1. different driving styles

2. different engine and driveline designs

3. different fuels,

4. different engine oil formulations,

5. different climatic conditions

Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: SR1919] #3943979
12/11/15 01:45 PM
12/11/15 01:45 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,218
Pennsylbammyvania
dailydriver Offline
dailydriver  Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,218
Pennsylbammyvania
Originally Posted By: SR1919
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
[quote=SR1919][quote=kschachn][quote=SR1919]

And what chemical components ar in Archoil that would show any tribological improvements over a good conventional or synthetic engine oil?


Good question. I had to guess a combination of WS2 and borate esters maybe. I have not found a VOA for Archoil 9300 yet.

I was trying to see if those folks that have used Archoil 9300 in their cars have observed any negative effects. For example some unintended reaction with seals, leaks or anything else that can be reported.

I would say that as a start one needs the VOA of the base oil that you are going to add Archoil 9300 to and then compare it so many miles/hours/cycles later via a UOA. Also there are some forums that contain databases of UOAs for specific range of engines (TDIs, CDIs, etc.) that one can analyze and compare averages (IF for the same kind of engine).

I agree that it is not an easy way to come to compare and draw conclusions.


The problem is that the 9300 product is SO durned costly that even the small amount needed for a VOA is costing the sender a very pretty penny. frown


2016 Ford Fiesta ST 14K miles
Ravenol DXG 5W-30
Amsoil Ea15K51 filter
Ravenol MTF-2 in the IB6 transaxle
Re: Ordered Archoil [Re: SR1919] #3944492
12/11/15 09:27 PM
12/11/15 09:27 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
San Francisco
keesue Offline
keesue  Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 102
San Francisco
Originally Posted By: SR1919
Originally Posted By: keesue
Intake track is completely clean. Never before. Ever. No crankcase blowby. No turbo blowby. Completely clean after 7K miles. Incredible...


Thanks for sharing your experience. Did you use Archoil 9300? And is your car a diesel?


Sure thing. Archoil 9100. Gasoline turbocharged engine (The 1981 TurboVolvo). I have no explanation for this other than the rings are sealing better and the turbo bearing is cleaner. All I know is what I've observed.

Last edited by keesue; 12/11/15 09:30 PM.

1981 Turbo Volvo with over 313,000 miles (bought new)
2001 S60-T5 Volvo
Page 9 of 10 1 8 9 10

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™