Recent Topics
Red 1998 Honda Civic DX 2DR HATCH - STOLEN - FRESNO CA
by Deliverance95345 - 12/08/19 05:40 PM
Non scientific oil test.
by tblt44 - 12/08/19 05:33 PM
Nitromethane prices
by 53' Stude - 12/08/19 05:31 PM
Question about JASO specs?
by frascati - 12/08/19 04:15 PM
Anyone knows outdoorsy magazine that are US only?
by MoneyJohn - 12/08/19 03:54 PM
Did Honda discontinue PSF
by iluvhonda - 12/08/19 02:44 PM
02 Silverado 5.3L LT Gas fill issue
by Gito - 12/08/19 02:30 PM
Quick Strut Advice
by coopns - 12/08/19 02:24 PM
Dq380/381 7sp wet clutch dsg
by SkodaPANDA - 12/08/19 02:18 PM
Christmas At Biltmore Estate
by gman2304 - 12/08/19 02:10 PM
K&N cabin filter
by jdw1222 - 12/08/19 01:37 PM
Max life
by Bettez88 - 12/08/19 01:20 PM
Looking for a used car under 10K
by dan_erickson - 12/08/19 01:13 PM
Intake vs Head gasket question.
by 007 - 12/08/19 12:40 PM
Wix vs Wix XP vs Amsoil oil filters
by pcowner1 - 12/08/19 10:46 AM
2011 Hyundai Sonata -- 3 cylinders dropped!!!
by BAJA_05 - 12/08/19 09:14 AM
Guidance on treating light rust on a undercarriage
by randytrish - 12/08/19 08:59 AM
Slow Dosage of Intake Cleaner in GDI Engines
by Boomer - 12/08/19 08:34 AM
Newest Members
Jonas_K, slxgold, Dennisfly, AutopartsTester8, Wamanada
70069 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
119 registered members (alarmguy, 53' Stude, Aero540T, AnthemBassMan, Alfred_B, 69Torino, 8 invisible), 1,945 guests, and 56 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics298,456
Posts5,135,820
Members70,069
Most Online3,589
Nov 2nd, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Auto RX re #2928547 03/04/13 10:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,311
R
roadrunner1 Offline OP
OP Offline
R
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,311
Gentlemen;

I completely understand why the thread I started was locked, the main reason I never answered any of the zany posts.

For the record;

I AM NOT A "SHILL"
i AM NOT A "PAID POSTER OF AUTO RX OR ANY OTHER COMPANY FOR THAT MATTER"

I mearly wanted to pass along results of an experience with a product, so far encouraging, no more or less.

It looks as if some members have an axe to grind, and I'm sorry that it got involved with preliminary results of an attempt to slow down oil usage in an '95 Honda.

I have actually talked to the owner of Auto RX, he has been helpful in the specific issue that I wanted to address with this particular engine, and after the early unanticipated progress in more power I ordered more to try in two different engines, both bought used, one recently and the other bought over 40 years ago.

Again I apoligize to the members who are here to gain information who had to read all of the garbage in the thread I started to relay what I had observed. Anyone who wishes to go through any of my previous posts and find anything I posted not to be informitive or trying to skew data please bring it to my attention, as I post here to share what I've observed, and to read what others have observed also.


'15 F350 6.7
Re: Auto RX re [Re: roadrunner1] #2928552 03/04/13 10:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,783
C
Clevy Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,783
Originally Posted By: roadrunner1
Gentlemen;

I completely understand why the thread I started was locked, the main reason I never answered any of the zany posts.

For the record;

I AM NOT A "SHILL"
i AM NOT A "PAID POSTER OF AUTO RX OR ANY OTHER COMPANY FOR THAT MATTER"

I mearly wanted to pass along results of an experience with a product, so far encouraging, no more or less.

It looks as if some members have an axe to grind, and I'm sorry that it got involved with preliminary results of an attempt to slow down oil usage in an '95 Honda.

I have actually talked to the owner of Auto RX, he has been helpful in the specific issue that I wanted to address with this particular engine, and after the early unanticipated progress in more power I ordered more to try in two different engines, both bought used, one recently and the other bought over 40 years ago.

Again I apoligize to the members who are here to gain information who had to read all of the garbage in the thread I started to relay what I had observed. Anyone who wishes to go through any of my previous posts and find anything I posted not to be informitive or trying to skew data please bring it to my attention, as I post here to share what I've observed, and to read what others have observed also.


That is the whole reason for this forum,to share experiences and ideas. Please post any and all observations as I would be interested in reading them.
Before and after pics would go a long wat too


2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter
Re: Auto RX re [Re: Clevy] #2928563 03/04/13 10:25 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,311
R
roadrunner1 Offline OP
OP Offline
R
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,311
Unfortunately I wasn't able to take any pics, or run a compression test as my son started a new job recently, is in the process of buying his first house, and is getting married in June. I was only trying to lend a hand, and share.

Harry Chapin "the Cats in the Cradle " fits this story line more than one can imagine, and all of the drama of the first thread aside, I am still encouraged by the preliminary results.


'15 F350 6.7
Re: Auto RX re [Re: roadrunner1] #2928566 03/04/13 10:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,094
K
Kuato Offline
Offline
K
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,094
I've had several positive experiences using AutoRX, and will use it again.

Can you show a link to the previous thread, or post the pertinent info here?


Thick vs Thin test: 15k / 43k miles complete
Re: Auto RX re [Re: roadrunner1] #2928621 03/04/13 11:45 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,730
T
Trajan Offline
Offline
T
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,730
Some have had success, (I have on the Camaro and Z4.)

And others have not.

That's the way with every product.

Would I use it again? Yes I would.

Last edited by Trajan; 03/04/13 11:46 PM.
Re: Auto RX re [Re: roadrunner1] #2929461 03/05/13 05:13 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,467
M
Mystic Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,467
I completely agree that people should be allowed to discuss oil supplements and engine cleaners here. I think that is the reason the Oil Additives Section exists.

I believe that people should be able to post their experiences with various products, such as Auto-RX, MMO, Kreen, Neutra, STP, or whatever and there should be polite discussion and debate allowed concerning those oil supplements and engine cleaners. I do not believe that there should be personal attacks on the person who posted or people who post replies. People can believe in a product or not believe but they should respect other posters and should debate the merits or lack of merits of a product. The only way we will find out about many of these products is by the personal experiences of people who have tried these products. We can't expect engine sequence testing to take place or some lab somewhere to conduct expensive and advanced scientific testing. Some people had submitted samples of these various products for UOA and VOA testing however.

Personally I would like to avoid discussing Auto-RX very much myself. I did use Auto-RX in the past (I still have two bottles) and it did seem to stop a seal leak, which was one of the claims for the product (as long as there was no physical damage to a seal). The people who talk about Auto-RX should receive the same consideration as anybody else.

And the people who like to discuss other products, such as MMO or Kreen, should also receive the same consideration.

Re: Auto RX re [Re: Mystic] #2929654 03/05/13 07:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,783
C
Clevy Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,783
Originally Posted By: Mystic
I completely agree that people should be allowed to discuss oil supplements and engine cleaners here. I think that is the reason the Oil Additives Section exists.

I believe that people should be able to post their experiences with various products, such as Auto-RX, MMO, Kreen, Neutra, STP, or whatever and there should be polite discussion and debate allowed concerning those oil supplements and engine cleaners. I do not believe that there should be personal attacks on the person who posted or people who post replies. People can believe in a product or not believe but they should respect other posters and should debate the merits or lack of merits of a product. The only way we will find out about many of these products is by the personal experiences of people who have tried these products. We can't expect engine sequence testing to take place or some lab somewhere to conduct expensive and advanced scientific testing. Some people had submitted samples of these various products for UOA and VOA testing however.

Personally I would like to avoid discussing Auto-RX very much myself. I did use Auto-RX in the past (I still have two bottles) and it did seem to stop a seal leak, which was one of the claims for the product (as long as there was no physical damage to a seal). The people who talk about Auto-RX should receive the same consideration as anybody else.

And the people who like to discuss other products, such as MMO or Kreen, should also receive the same consideration.


I completely agree with you. It baffles me that some members feel the need to push their no additive agenda thereby polluting a possibly informative thread.
I personally want to read about experiences with a product,good and bad. Those members experiences will help me make up my mind whether or not to use the product in question.
There is no need to post blah blah read your handbook bah blah no additives blah blah.
Post experiences. From those experiences us members who haven't tried the product in question can learn from and make a choice.

Good post mystic


2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter
Re: Auto RX re [Re: roadrunner1] #2929888 03/05/13 11:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 866
M
mkosem Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 866
I had good luck with it on my old Saturn, but that was over 10 years ago before whatever stigma has started floating around. At that time, plenty of other people were too.

That said, not to discredit this product in any way, I've had mostly newer or new cars since then which have been treated to a steady diet of synthetics along with standard dosing of LC20 that have cleaned them up and kept them clean. The worst oil burners were my ALH TDI and my 2.0T FSI. Both consumed roughly 1qt/1000mi and both were cleaned with several shorter intervals (5k instead of the required 10k) of quality syntetic oils. The TDI was down to 1qt/5k and the FSI was down to ~1.5qt/5k The TDI on ELF oils and the FSI on Motul and RedLine.

I've personally experienced this product's merits, but I feel like modern "cleaning" oils can do just as good a job. They may be more expensive in the long run and may tackle the job more slowly, but I've had comparable luck going either way (admittedly on different vehicles).

--Matt

Last edited by mkosem; 03/05/13 11:14 PM.
Re: Auto RX re [Re: Clevy] #2930665 03/06/13 05:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,467
M
Mystic Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,467
Now sure it would be nice to get some before and after photographs in the case of a cleaning product, and maybe some compression tests, and for an oil supplement used in motor oil to get a UOA and a VOA. Or get a VOA just for the oil supplement to see what it contains. But we can't expect engine sequence testing for any of these engine cleaners and oil supplements or some sort of elaborate lab testing.

Re: Auto RX re [Re: Mystic] #2932157 03/08/13 12:43 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 38
E
eliminator Offline
Offline
E
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 38
I don't have any photos, but I do have results from compression tests. I bought my '95 BMW 540 with ~210,000 miles. At that time compression was in the 180's across the board. Highway mpg was in the 20-21 range. After one clean/rinse cycle, compression was in the 190's across the board. I did a second clean/rinse. Gradually, mileage increased to ~25 on the highway, and has stayed there for over 50k miles. The car is at about 270,000 miles now and I just did another compression test. All cylinders are around 200, plus or minus a couple psi. I'm running a 10,000 mile oci, and Blackstone says everything looks great.

Re: Auto RX re [Re: roadrunner1] #2932271 03/08/13 06:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,192
E
electrolover Offline
Offline
E
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,192
They don't have pics because it doesn't work. But that's not to the purpose here. They keep startng threads to get people talking about this garbage.

old accounts show up after years of being gone just to mention the product....
That's not fishy at all......NOT!

Re: Auto RX re [Re: roadrunner1] #2932442 03/08/13 09:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,192
E
electrolover Offline
Offline
E
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,192
http://www.davemanuel.com/investor-dictionary/snake-oil-salesman/

I found this interesting. Sounds like it was written about a certain product

Re: Auto RX re [Re: electrolover] #2932458 03/08/13 10:15 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,730
T
Trajan Offline
Offline
T
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,730
Originally Posted By: electrolover
They don't have pics because it doesn't work. But that's not to the purpose here. They keep startng threads to get people talking about this garbage.



True. kreen/mmo pushers don't have pics for that very reason.

Re: Auto RX re [Re: electrolover] #2932460 03/08/13 10:16 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,730
T
Trajan Offline
Offline
T
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,730
Originally Posted By: electrolover
http://www.davemanuel.com/investor-dictionary/snake-oil-salesman/

I found this interesting. Sounds like it was written about a certain product


This isn't a kreen thread.

Last edited by Trajan; 03/08/13 10:20 AM.
Re: Auto RX re [Re: Trajan] #2932468 03/08/13 10:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 22,642
T
Trav Offline
Offline
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 22,642
Originally Posted By: Trajan
This isn't a kreen thread.


But you are the only one mentioning it. One has to wonder why.
You cant even stay on topic in a thread about your favorite additive.


ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™