Originally Posted By: SOHCman
I am starting to think people are incorrectly assuming that the torque is "thread torque" and makes antisieze wildly throw off the torque reading. Isn't the gasket/taper seat pressure what we are really "torquing" and antisieze on the threads doesn't really make as much difference as we make out?
Just speculation, especially with all this talk about 3/4 of a turn for seat pressure being what really matters.
This is taking the subject matter beyond what's practical, but here goes. I actually think that you are incorrectly assuming what torque actually is a measure of....turning force, not "seat pressure". Turning force is a poor measurement for "tightness" because it depends on too many variables: friction, stretch, etc.. If the mfg. posts a torque value based on clean, dry threads and you alter that by applying a lubricant, then there is a chance that the torque reading will not reflect the actual clamping force (stretch) that occurs between the threads and the "seat pressure", the seat being a nut, bolt head, or spark plug contact point.
Using degrees (1/8 or 2/3 turn past finger tight) does away with many of the variables involved with torque measurement. Study any engineering site about torque measurement and you will discover that +/- 30% error is the standard for torque measurements.
On the other hand, people here are describing the starting point (finger tight/until contact) with different definitions. After these starting differences, I imagine that the difference in 1/16 - 1/8 turn (tapered seat) or 1/2 and 2/3 turn (crush gasket) amounts to a large difference in clamping force. Thus the recommendations here to use "common sense" feel.
An academic discussion, at this point and just a reflection of my boredom and wish to share info.