WSS-M2C200-D2 vs WSD-M2C200-C

Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
8
Location
Zurich
Hello all

I am the owner of a Fiesta ST150, 2007 that has the IB5 gearbox. It is the time to change clutch and I though to replace the transmission oil too. The problem is, that Ford spare parts sellers sell the WSS-M2C200-D2 whereas the manual refers to WSD-M2C200-C. The latter is a 75W90 oil, while the former is a FE75 (whatever that means). Does anyone know what is the difference between the two?

I would like to believe that there is probably a reason why the D2 pops up as a recommendation, but on the other hand the C, seems like a more appropriate transmission fluid. Any infos would be more than welcome, thanks
 
I used Ravenol in my ex-Focus manual, worked well:

RAVENOL MTF-3 SAE 75W is tried and tested for aggregates specifying:
Recommendations: ACDelco 10-4037; BOT 303, BOT 350 M3; Fiat 9.55550-MZ6; FORD WSS-M2C200-D2, WSS-M2C200-D3; ...

 
D2 is last eco spec, very thin oil.
C is the classic spec, tick oil.
Both are mostly real syn, true GL4 and same additive.
If not good reason for D2, stay with C or compatible 75w85/90 pure GL4.
 
Thank you all for the info! I went for D2 (75W), as I thought that a gearbox with 230K kms (about140K miles) could use a thinner oil to be smoother - not sure if that thought makes sense. I also hesitated to go against Ford's recommendation, I noticed that they recommend D2 in almost every car of that period (2000-2010/12). Let's see how it goes
 
Thank you all for the info! I went for D2 (75W), as I thought that a gearbox with 230K kms (about140K miles) could use a thinner oil to be smoother - not sure if that thought makes sense. I also hesitated to go against Ford's recommendation, I noticed that they recommend D2 in almost every car of that period (2000-2010/12). Let's see how it goes
So how is your transmission doing? I'm thinking about changing original C oil to D2 just like you.
 
Back
Top