Wonder why GM is having trouble?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: daves87rs
some of those cars will just nickel and dime you to death...

The Blazer is a prime example of that....
My '00 cav had to have a new fuel pump at 65,000 and my wife's '03 impala needs rear brakes this time. I'm done with GM.
15.gif
Back to ford for me.
 
just cause you have 4wd does not mean you won't do 4 wheel skid.
ice is a nono, you can be driving at 10 mph and you will have no control.
fresh snow on the other hand is different story.
but then again, what do I know, I am just a "stupid GM owner abusing ma vehicle", didn't they just enact a law against such behavior in Florida?
 
Originally Posted By: RacerE7773
Originally Posted By: daves87rs
some of those cars will just nickel and dime you to death...

The Blazer is a prime example of that....
My '00 cav had to have a new fuel pump at 65,000 and my wife's '03 impala needs rear brakes this time. I'm done with GM.
15.gif
Back to ford for me.



Well, you may want a Honda then....
 
Originally Posted By: Buffman
^^ someone got butthurt on the optispark. How'd you fry a motor with a failed optispark? You know it's just like a dist and needs maintenance too :)


They should last forever, after all every time the water pump seeps out it's drain hole located directly above the Opti[censored] the unsealed Opti[censored] located right under the water pump gets washed out with Deathcool.
crackmeup2.gif



Is they no overpriced unmitigated piece of excrement on a car that someone won't apologize for?
grin2.gif
 
I own 5 GMs. I have an 04 Cavalier with 112,000 miles that does not drop or burn any oil, gets 30mpg, and still runs like new. A guy I work with has a Cavalier with 250,000 miles on it with no maintenane issues. My wife has an 05 LaCrosse with over 50k on it with no probs yet and it looks and runs like new. I also have a 72 Suburban, 68 Chevelle, and 70 truck. My Suburban is 37 years old and I drive it often. My 68 Chevelle is 41 years old and bulletproof. No doubt GM may not be as reliable as their imported counterparts. But I guess I have been lucky, and my Cavalier cost me $10,300 new, and I probably helped keep a little more money in the States. No complaints here.
 
Originally Posted By: Ed_T
Buying a new GM//Chrysler//Ford is like putting a blowtorch to your money given the immediate cliff depreciation that occurs. It's expensive to support these patriotic badges. One has got to be willing to take more than one for the team.


And buying a new Toyota/Honda is like adding more fuel to the fire that is destroying America's industrial base. It's expensive to support stupidity that buys Toyota when they have just as many problems as GM cars.

I love the way that when someone buys a Toyota and it's a total POS they forgive all the problems, but you hear about a GM car that went 60K miles and needed a set of rear brakes and suddenly it's total garbage.
 
Originally Posted By: RacerE7773
Originally Posted By: daves87rs
some of those cars will just nickel and dime you to death...

The Blazer is a prime example of that....
My '00 cav had to have a new fuel pump at 65,000 and my wife's '03 impala needs rear brakes this time. I'm done with GM.
15.gif
Back to ford for me.



Fuel pumps go up. And you're complaining about needing brakes on a car that's 5-6yrs old???? It's a wear item!
 
Fuel pumps usually don't die, they get killed! Running low/out of fuel will certainly be the early death of them!
 
Originally Posted By: rn2fine
I own 5 GMs. I have an 04 Cavalier with 112,000 miles that does not drop or burn any oil, gets 30mpg, and still runs like new. A guy I work with has a Cavalier with 250,000 miles on it with no maintenane issues. My wife has an 05 LaCrosse with over 50k on it with no probs yet and it looks and runs like new. I also have a 72 Suburban, 68 Chevelle, and 70 truck. My Suburban is 37 years old and I drive it often. My 68 Chevelle is 41 years old and bulletproof. No doubt GM may not be as reliable as their imported counterparts. But I guess I have been lucky, and my Cavalier cost me $10,300 new, and I probably helped keep a little more money in the States. No complaints here.



Sounds like our 03 Cavalier...
grin2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: mstrjon32
Originally Posted By: Ed_T
Buying a new GM//Chrysler//Ford is like putting a blowtorch to your money given the immediate cliff depreciation that occurs. It's expensive to support these patriotic badges. One has got to be willing to take more than one for the team.


And buying a new Toyota/Honda is like adding more fuel to the fire that is destroying America's industrial base. It's expensive to support stupidity that buys Toyota when they have just as many problems as GM cars.

I love the way that when someone buys a Toyota and it's a total POS they forgive all the problems, but you hear about a GM car that went 60K miles and needed a set of rear brakes and suddenly it's total garbage.


Americans by and large like to get value when spending their hard-earned dollars. Producing vehicles that have had the life sucked out of them on the drawing board because all the money goes to UAW-(fill in your favorite terms) instead of quality components and design has contributed mightily to the fall of the big three.

It isn't fair to blame those who choose to get as much 'bang for the buck' when purchasing a vehicle if they decide not to go 'big-three'. Their quality was not there for many, many years, and while their latest efforts to catch up have mainly produced slews of competitive vehicles available for sale at this very moment, the memory of the horrendous experiences many had at the hands of the big-three and their dealerships has destroyed permanently their willingness to even consider walking into such a dealership anything more than a laughable proposition. I know it has for me.

Even Car & Driver said it years ago: 'you can't buy an American car that won't give you fits'. Well, I don't have the time and patience for that any more. That trust that had been broken will not be repaired in my lifetime.

Of the three Toyota's in my family at this time, the one best screwed together is the '03 4Runner with well over 100k miles. It remains squeak and rattle-free. It was 'made in Japan', while the two others were 'made here' in Lexington, KY, and are obviously less-tight, with well under 100k miles on each. Bulletproof, uber-reliable, but a less-satisfactory ownership experience.

The cycle continues: "Toyota - the next GM?"
 
Aside from battling rust, my 99 LeSabre has been a decent car. It was mistreated by former owners, yet runs like a champ after some TLC.
 
I would not blame GM for issues that stem from POOR assembly,
If you demand quality and show them that you will not accept anything less. you will get it.
GM/Ford/Dodge also get some blame as they spec their parts and tolerate more failure rate from supplier so save a few pennies and line their own pocket.
maybe someone who works with the big autos can comment, mine is mostly 2nd hand info from talking to execs and engineers I have met.
 
Originally Posted By: Ed_T
It isn't fair to blame those who choose to get as much 'bang for the buck' when purchasing a vehicle if they decide not to go 'big-three'.


I disagree. I think it's plenty fair. I'm not sure how many American hard-earn anything anymore, either. Take a look around, this is the entitlement generation.

I still maintain that if you think Toyota makes better cars than GM, you haven't been in a comparable GM in 10 years. It's not fair to compare your Aveo rental car to an Avalon either, so spare me those comments.
 
Originally Posted By: mstrjon32
Originally Posted By: Ed_T
It isn't fair to blame those who choose to get as much 'bang for the buck' when purchasing a vehicle if they decide not to go 'big-three'.


I disagree. I think it's plenty fair. I'm not sure how many American hard-earn anything anymore, either. Take a look around, this is the entitlement generation.




I have to agree with that....
 
Originally Posted By: mstrjon32

I disagree. I think it's plenty fair. I'm not sure how many American hard-earn anything anymore, either. Take a look around, this is the entitlement generation.


I'm sorry but that is such [censored]. There are people in every generation who work hard and people who don't.
 
That's true. But it feels like the ratio of those who work hard to those who don't is increasing alarmingly.

Hopefully I'm wrong and just a crank. It would be unfortunate if I wasn't.
 
Originally Posted By: rationull
Originally Posted By: mstrjon32

I disagree. I think it's plenty fair. I'm not sure how many American hard-earn anything anymore, either. Take a look around, this is the entitlement generation.


I'm sorry but that is such [censored]. There are people in every generation who work hard and people who don't.



Well, if you look to see how much we "give" our kids now, it would not surprise those who know...everything to "new" cars (remember those hand me down Escorts?) to the latest clothes, to Ipods...today's (and the last 10-15 years or so) kids seem to do better than their parents...
 
Are you going to blame the kids for that?

EDIT: And just to head it off, I'm probably part of this "entitlement" generation, but I proudly paid $650 of my own money for my first car :)
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: mstrjon32
That's true. But it feels like the ratio of those who work hard to those who don't is increasing alarmingly.

Hopefully I'm wrong and just a crank. It would be unfortunate if I wasn't.


I'm just not sure.. I could believe it either way. On the one hand yes it might seem that way. But OTOH there are more people and much more exposure to all different kinds of people through the media than in the past, too. It could tend to make things look worse than they are.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom