Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
My grandparents lives were turned upside down during WWII. I still buy GC.
I, and others respect your position on not wanting to buy oil from Citgo, but politics doesn't belong in the oil forum.
FWIW, when I see the Citgo logo, I think of Fenway.
So were mine, and they were ethnic Germans. People sweep the 2M of them killed under the rug like it didnt happen...
So I 100% agree - let's keep arguable history from other lands from 50+ years ago out of this. There have been a number of threads regarding German and Japanese automakers and whatnot, which have gone off the deep end. Hopefully we can keep this to supply chain and wal-mart operations centric. He is specifically speaking of CITGO and their business and practices today, so let's just leave that at that.
Perhaps more questionable than Citgo's (known) alignment is the business practices of Wal-Mart to buy from these vendors to minimize prices at all costs. That may not sit well with folks, as it appears to not with the OP.
So then the question is if buying WPP ST locally makes a difference with respect to supporting the sale of Citgo-branded ST elsewhere.
Im no fan of Wal-mart by a long shot, but I do like to look at their selection of oils because they carry a ton. And it strikes me that each store has a slightly different mix of what they carry... In some Ive seen Trop Arctic, in others Ive seen Maxlife ATF, and in others, Ive seen next to nothing good. Assuming that each does just in time inventory based upon their sales of products specific to their stores, my initial guess is that the demand signal for WPP in one store is completely irrelevant and unrelated to the demand signal for citgo ST in another store. It may well influence quantities and contracting when those supplier contracts are due for renewal... But I doubt that anyone is going to influence that - WM could change suppliers to WPP or Citgo the country over, IF they offer a lower price...
That some may be conscientious about stuff like this is a good thing, IMO. But if the OP is buying WPP, I dont see it relating back to the sale of Citgo ST elsewhere... Others who do get Citgo ST may want to make their buying decision accordingly though.
I tend to overthink and then have knee jerk reactions at times (they go poorly together). If Supertech synthetic were striclty a CITGO product, my thread may have made more sense or held more weight. But you are correct, WPP has no fault in this and it would not be fair to them, who make a great product, not to purchase Supertech anymore. So, as long as the bottle says WPP or anything other than CITGO (don't know their logo), i will continue to purchase.