Why is Mobil 1 such a lightning rod?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Mobil 1 is such a lightning rod because it seems to make people defend it so much. Is that because they have a interest in it? (they work for XM, Family works for XM?)

People will accuse you of defending a product even if all you do is object to their criticism of it. It would seem there is quite a lot of defensiveness on both sides.
 
It's mainly a lightning rod because they have commanded 60% of the syn lube market for years.
 
Originally Posted By: sayjac
In the non boutique synthetics, SOPUS products are looking pretty solid to me.


+1
 
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Originally Posted By: tig1

Drew,
Can I still point out facts of many family and friends using nothing but M1 with engines that have many miles on them(200-300K+) with never any engine problems, like wear?


And same here. The difference is we use oil. Any type and brand. 200k+ easy and 394k on one and it was running like it did 20 years ago. No smoke, passed dyno smog and ran great... Type of oil was conventional and mostly Valvoline and Halvoline in 10w-30 till 1996 then 5w30.

Originally Posted By: tig1

No benefit for the average driver ,Except engines that will last a very long time. Can't take that away from M1.


Again, engines last a long time on ANY oil. Can't take that away.

Originally Posted By: tig1

Through engines that are running well with very high miles with no internal engine problems.


And many run very high miles with no internal engine problems. You REALLY need to understand that more engines do that and they don't run Mobil 1. Even though both start with a "M", Mobil 1 is not MAGIC....
20.gif


Originally Posted By: tig1

Yes, high mileage engines, not a handful of useless UOAs.


Until I came here to BITOG I'd NEVER done a UOA. (and they are far from useless (unless you run Mobil 1 or Redline then they are) but that is another subject..
smirk2.gif
) and taken many an engine to 200k+ when I normally sell the vehicle to friends or family and get to watch the vehicle continue in life.

And all on oil. Mostly what is on sale and change it. The only thing I'm loyal to is keeping the vehicle maintained and keeping as much $$ in my pocket book because being brand loyal does nothing for you in the end.

Originally Posted By: Mustang Man
Originally Posted By: Audi Junkie
-Extended drains
Look at the UOA section. How many synth drains are really "extended"? Typically, everyone here is doing 6000-9000 miles drains, regardless of oil. Plenty of long (and successful) dino drains past 10k on the UOA forum. My Honda speced olms of 10k on dino.

After going through the first 8 pages of the UOA section and looking at titles, I found only this one on dino that was close to 10K...

https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/chevron-5w30-9417-miles-2008-impala-3-5.132245/

I agree that many using synthetic are not going the distance. I guess some worry too much about their oil.


Well you only then need to go through the other 300 pages.
48.gif
There are many UOAs with conventional going a lot longer OCI than the normal syn UOA.

Everyone needs to remember that across the US MANY MANY more engines are going the distance with no problems using conventional oils over syns. And they don't get crazy like we do with filters and oils. They just get the oil changed at their Ford express lane or Jiffy Lube (and a lot longer OCI than 3000 miles) and get on with it.

There is a big difference between NEED and WANT.

I've got a jug of Mobil 1 in the stash and ran a load of 0w-30 last winter. My engine did not blow up but it did not get 100MPG and run better just because Mobil 1 was in the sump.

Same results with PP also..
21.gif


Mobil 1 is such a lightning rod because it seems to make people defend it so much. Is that because they have a interest in it? (they work for XM, Family works for XM?)

Probably but we could never prove it. But the way they come out in ANY thread once Mobil 1 is typed is amazing.

Bill


Wow! When I'm quoted by this many times I must be doing something right! After my very fist post here at BITOG, Overk1ll warned me I would be bashed for saying something good about M1 oils. So M1 bashing was alive and well long ago. Also, Bill, as much as you want to think I have a personal, or financial interest in XM, I assure you I don't. Wish I did, but I don't. XM is a ture American success story, and in times like these this country needs more of them.
 
Originally Posted By: buster
It's mainly a lightning rod because they have commanded 60% of the syn lube market for years.


M1 is a lighting rod because I support it. Please give the the due I have coming.
20.gif
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: d00df00d
Originally Posted By: Bill in Utah
Mobil 1 is such a lightning rod because it seems to make people defend it so much. Is that because they have a interest in it? (they work for XM, Family works for XM?)

People will accuse you of defending a product even if all you do is object to their criticism of it. It would seem there is quite a lot of defensiveness on both sides.


Before I ever heard of BITOG I never gave much thought to engine oil(M1 or anything else) other than M1 protected my engines well, so I kept using it. I never knew so many could be so policical about something so mundane as oil. Has anyone noticed I never am never crutical of other oils. I think all of them are fine today, especially PP. I know, I think I will start using PP and see how long it takes some here to accuse me of working for SOPUS, and begin bashing PP.
 
Originally Posted By: Oldwolf
No one ever bashed the losers, just the Top Dog.

I don't know about that. Synlube got more than its fair share, I'd say...
lol.gif
 
Originally Posted By: d00df00d
Originally Posted By: Oldwolf
No one ever bashed the losers, just the Top Dog.

I don't know about that. Synlube got more than its fair share, I'd say...
lol.gif



Their 1995 website alone is cause for their being based into oblivion...
 
Quote:
After my very fist post here at BITOG, Overk1ll warned me I would be bashed for saying something good about M1 oils.


Not true at all. Absolutely not. You will get challenged when you post only good things whenever there is something questioned about M1.

THERE'S A BIG DIFFERENCE between the two.


Tig: I really like M1!

No problem.


Anyone: There's a report on xxyyzz.com where one taxi fleet used M1 on only two units to do a cost:benefit analysis. The two units had to be taken out of service for cam failure

Tig: I've been using it for 32 years and never had any such wear issues. 10,000 of my close friends and associates too. All going more miles than Bill from Utah and his extended family combined ..since the beginning of time.

Various others: That's hardly proof that M1 is responsible

etc..etc..etc.

That's the format I see. Not M1 bashing, per se~.

It's almost like a programmed response to stimuli ..or if you were into conspiracy theories ... SIPAPC

Strategic Interference Posting Against Public Criticism


It's the difference between someone running into you ..and you playing in traffic to get in the way and claiming that you're the victim.
 
Originally Posted By: jtaylor


extended drains...ok that could save money

cleaner...that's always better

better handling of heat...especially for high RPM's

Shear resistant...definitely for high RPM's(also extended drains)

Margin of protection... ??? sounds good

pumpability at low temperatures... well thats good for cold startup regardless, engines don't operate at even 100 degreesF.

To me,,, it sounds like synthetics do have a purpose.



I said to demonstrate those qualities, not comment on them. They are all in fact esoteric constructions that are not applicable in the real world... like cold pumping in the teens. Not to worry about cold-pumping in Southern California!

That list reads more like some Troboligist's wet dream.
 
Originally Posted By: tig1


Wow! When I'm quoted by this many times I must be doing something right! After my very fist post here at BITOG, Overk1ll warned me I would be bashed for saying something good about M1 oils. So M1 bashing was alive and well long ago. Also, Bill, as much as you want to think I have a personal, or financial interest in XM, I assure you I don't. Wish I did, but I don't. XM is a ture American success story, and in times like these this country needs more of them.


And he STILL does not understand...
33.gif
21.gif
 
...back on topic here, it's been a lightning rod "lately" mainly for a few reasons.

1. Higher Fe in UOA's

2. Ashland 4x better wear and failure of Seq IVA

3. BP's 8x better wear.

4. Noise and consumption in some engines.

Mobil HAS lost credibility to a lot of people that have moved on to other brands. I can't say I blame them.

Historically a great brand of oils, but quality has been questionable lately. (5 years of so).
 
Quote:
Before I ever heard of BITOG I never gave much thought to engine oil(M1 or anything else) other than M1 protected my engines well, so I kept using it. I never knew so many could be so policical about something so mundane as oil. Has anyone noticed I never am never crutical of other oils. I think all of them are fine today, especially PP. I know, I think I will start using PP and see how long it takes some here to accuse me of working for SOPUS, and begin bashing PP.


I can go back a few threads to show where you were almost in arms over a Castrol post I made... however I may have said Mobil 1, I don't recall however I can go back to find the post.. Yes 90% of the problem of Mobil 1 being a lightening rod is the defensiveness of the lovers (tig1 you have become the defensive ring leader)

Now to tig1 this not personal, it's just what happens when anything about mobil 1 is posted you jump in with the 30 years using mobil 1, the family members, and the combined mileage on these motors using nothing but mobil 1... all this tells is mobil 1 made a huge amount of money off of you, your friends, and your family members !! I also assume these family members, friends, engines have no other option to run anything but mobil 1 if you act at home like you do here I can see you running over to anyones house nearby, kin etc when they raise the hood for a oil change or to add oil to start in on how mobil 1 has protected ... well you get the point.

tig1 it would be far better to let the mobil 1 bashing run it's course.. I for one think there is some credit to these accusations, and I'm sure I'm one of the ones who don't have a clue from the previous post on this thread, but if money is coming out of my pocket I have the right to question any problems when paying for a product who's name, history, and selling price supposed to put them at the leadership(leadership in more than just sales, but in engine oil being the very best) in synthetic oils.
 
Originally Posted By: rclint
Quote:
Before I ever heard of BITOG I never gave much thought to engine oil(M1 or anything else) other than M1 protected my engines well, so I kept using it. I never knew so many could be so policical about something so mundane as oil. Has anyone noticed I never am never crutical of other oils. I think all of them are fine today, especially PP. I know, I think I will start using PP and see how long it takes some here to accuse me of working for SOPUS, and begin bashing PP.


I can go back a few threads to show where you were almost in arms over a Castrol post I made... however I may have said Mobil 1, I don't recall however I can go back to find the post.. Yes 90% of the problem of Mobil 1 being a lightening rod is the defensiveness of the lovers (tig1 you have become the defensive ring leader)

Now to tig1 this not personal, it's just what happens when anything about mobil 1 is posted you jump in with the 30 years using mobil 1, the family members, and the combined mileage on these motors using nothing but mobil 1... all this tells is mobil 1 made a huge amount of money off of you, your friends, and your family members !! I also assume these family members, friends, engines have no other option to run anything but mobil 1 if you act at home like you do here I can see you running over to anyones house nearby, kin etc when they raise the hood for a oil change or to add oil to start in on how mobil 1 has protected ... well you get the point.

tig1 it would be far better to let the mobil 1 bashing run it's course.. I for one think there is some credit to these accusations, and I'm sure I'm one of the ones who don't have a clue from the previous post on this thread, but if money is coming out of my pocket I have the right to question any problems when paying for a product who's name, history, and selling price supposed to put them at the leadership(leadership in more than just sales, but in engine oil being the very best) in synthetic oils.


I'm getting slamed again I see. Please recheck your post. I have never had any negitive comment about Castrol oil. Now I have said their bashing marketing and other adds are silly, but their oil is fine. Also find a single thread I have started that would present itself as venue for starting squables over oil.
 
All of this nit-picking is getting retarded. Synthetics (even the Group III wanna-bes), last longer, pour colder, take more heat, yada yada yada as been said and proven here numerous times than dino. THAT IS FACT!

If you guys running dino want to change yours every 3-5K then have at it. As the specs for oil get more stringent, dino is going to be a thing of the past one of these days. There will only be semi-synthetics and synthetics. And it makes complete sense for the oil companies to go this route. Why waste money making an inferior product when synthetics do it all better and sell for more? Heck prices may in fact go down since manufacturing costs for dino would be eliminated.

And constantly running UOAs is a waste of money unless you suspect you are having an engine problem.

Like I said in a thread that got locked down thanks to others, I went with M1 0w-30 because I wanted a 0w-30 oil that was easy to find. And, in my car, it is already removing varnish from whatever oil the previous owner used which I am thinking was in fact Motorcraft 5w-20.

I like those Amsoil test results. Not to see how good Amsoil is but how the others oils did and how they compare to each other which M1 usually out-performs the other oils tested.

And what about that dino cleanliness? Sure it keeps an engine clean as most of the fanboys for it change it every 3K! So you are going to change the oil 3 times in the time most synthetics easily do 1 OCI. So $15 for a 5 qt. jug of dino and another $3 for a decent oil filter is $18 and that done 3 times is $54. Whereas 1 change of a synthetic in that time is $30 less ($21 for a 5 qt. jug of M1 and $3 for a decent oil filter).

Assuming M1 is still mainly PAO, it is way easier to get it than Amsoil, Redline, Royal Purple, etc. so it is definitely #1 in availability in the synthetics. Is M1 the best of the synthetics? Sure! Why not, lol.
 
Originally Posted By: Mustang Man
Synthetics (even the Group III wanna-bes), last longer, pour colder, take more heat, yada yada yada as been said and proven here numerous times than dino.

THAT IS FACT!



Prove it.

Originally Posted By: Mustang Man

Assuming M1 is still mainly PAO


Prove it.
 
I'm still waiting to see an engine that was destroyed using Mobil 1. I'm pretty sure I'll get 250K out of my Subie, at which point I probably won't own the car anymore, so what's the point?
 
Who ever said the forum was all about BRANDS anyway? To me, it's about products in general (grades) and correct service intervals. Take your Subaru WRX or whatever, aren't those owners well served at BitOG with the advice of: running a "synth 5w-40" at "3-5K ...depending"?

Yes, some mfg's specific products are unique and deserve attention. When this forum first formed, M1 0w-40 was a novelty item, and later it became GC and to a degree PP. To drone on and on about "Mobil" makes no sense, when they have the widest product line,and there is really only one (or two) flawed products in that line.

I did notice the comment abouve about the same type drivers who circled like sharks around Castrol over the hydrocrack base oil thing rush to circle their *wagons* around Mobil 1...this is when there is actual SCIENTIFIC PROOF if a defect in M1 5w30.


By "scientific proof", I'll take the widest possible interpretation to include lab sequence; UOAs and Seq IVA, subjective observations of noise, and the anecdotal, consumption.


Much of the general pro-synth mantras just don't translate into real-life service. Should I run a fill of Krytox just because there's some frost on the pumpkin?

http://www2.dupont.com/Lubricants/en_US/assets/downloads/Krytox_Overview_H-58505-3_19april2010.pdf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom