This.
It goes to show you have to analyze numbers in context. If a 1% number goes to 3% during the same period a 20% number goes to 25%, the 1% population is growing faster in relative terms, 200% growth, but the 20% population grew larger in total population growth. I.E 2% more is less than 5% more in total numbers.
Clear?
Originally Posted By: LazyPrizm
Originally Posted By: hatt
The educated are the faster growing segment of the welfare state.
My goodness, time to burn down the ivory towers and drive those freeloaders into the street! But first, let's read
the actual paper you are citing, shall we?
Quote:
The rates of receipt of aid in households of advanced degree holders roughly doubled between 2007 and 2010, but still remained under 2 percent, while the rate for those with less than a high school education is 22 percent, and the rate for high school graduates is 13 percent, increasing by 8 and 6 percentage points, respectively, since 2007.
I'll close with the paper's first sentence:
Quote:
Education is not a panacea, yet it is the most effective means of economic advancement.