Been asking around in various forums and reading tire tests. So far, I'm getting the impression that Blizzak WS90 is unique in its class – not necessarily "better," but different – and wanted to check that with people who've had experience with it.
Again, this is the impression I'm getting so far –
not my own experience – and I'm posting here to see if better-informed people agree.
TireRack's test of the WS90 is the only objective test I've seen (can't see the CR results in detail). But the results line up with subjective reviews I've read: the WS90 seems to outperform its peers in almost every objective measure of traction/grip. Weirdly, it seems to do better on all surfaces at the same time, avoiding the usual tradeoffs between snow/ice and wet/dry.
I've also had multiple people bring up these tires even when they seem to understand that my usage points more toward a "continental European" or performance winter type tire.
It's almost like the WS90 is a have-it-all winter tire: it does "Nordic" tire things on snow/ice, but it's almost like a "continental European" tire on wet/dry.
Caveats:
- At ~half tread depth, the tread compound changes and winter performance drops sharply
- Mediocre handling behavior vs. best-in-class
- Slight lack of refinement vs. best-in-class
- Short-ish overall tread life
- Even faster wear in warm conditions than other winter tires
Is that about right? What do you all think?