What is torque steer?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 11, 2002
Messages
688
Location
Fort Smith, AR
I keep reading about it in trade magazines when they review cars, but I don't know that I know what it is? What does it feel like when you're driving?
dunno.gif
 
Torque steer feels like the steering wheel has a will of its own while accelerating in a FWD car. Carefully designed multilink front suspensions can virtually eliminate torque steer.
 
Powerful FWD's experience this under very hard acceleration from a stop. Most people in normal driving will not ever experience it.
 
It's more pronounced in cars where the transaxle has unequal length half-shafts.
 
Quote:


Torque steer feels like the steering wheel has a will of its own while accelerating in a FWD car. Carefully designed multilink front suspensions can virtually eliminate torque steer.



Either the front suspension is typically Macpherson strut or Double a-arm...torque steer has more to do with the halfshafts and amount of power. Generally the whole reason for FWD is it keeps cost down and it allows more interior space.
 
My 3000GT`s steering wheel would always turn to the right if I ever made the tires spin. It was an N/A,but #@$%! that car was fast!!!!!!!!!! Had a hellacious powerband from 4000 rpm to red line. Man I sure miss her!
 
Yeah... mom has a V40 T4 (200hp turbo)... the car is pretty light. Floor that thing in a straight line, and get ready to fight with the steering wheel.
 
my wife's old 89 accord Lxi used to do it really bad..
every time it shifted under decent acceleration, you could feel the st/wheel kick/jerk pretty hard.
 
My 2006 Monte Carlo will pull to the right if I gun it from a stop as it pulls up past 4K RPM. Other than that, I never feel it...I only have actually full throttled it once (from a stop anyway) just to see how it was.
 
Quote:


Either the front suspension is typically Macpherson strut or Double a-arm...torque steer has more to do with the halfshafts and amount of power. Generally the whole reason for FWD is it keeps cost down and it allows more interior space.




I wasn't talking about the cause of torque steer. I was talking about how to minimize it -- which is through suspension design.

My old Scirocco with simple McPherson strut front exhibited a massive amount of torque steer with an anemic 95 hp engine and 225/50 tires. My Audi with its rather complicated front suspension setup shows no noticeable torque steer. Its multilink (not double-A arm) front suspension was specifically designed to eliminate not only torque steer bute also to a large degree understeer.
 
Last edited:
Quote:


Quote:


Either the front suspension is typically Macpherson strut or Double a-arm...torque steer has more to do with the halfshafts and amount of power. Generally the whole reason for FWD is it keeps cost down and it allows more interior space.




I wasn't talking about the cause of torque steer. I was talking about how to minimize it -- which is through suspension design.

My old Scirocco with simple McPherson strut front exhibited a massive amount of torque steer with an anemic 95 hp engine and 225/50 tires. My Audi with its rather complicated front suspension setup shows no noticeable torque steer. Its multilink (not double-A arm) front suspension was specifically designed to eliminate not only torque steer bute also to a large degree understeer.



Didn't know the B5 A4's had the 4-link setup up front...though they def. push a bit when run at 8/10 or more, granted having all the weight over the front end is probably more of the issue.
 
A couple of weeks ago I rented a 303 HP Pontiac Grand Prix with a 5.3 V8. That was my definition of torque steer, however, it was torque steer with a big ol' grin
smile.gif
 
Actually, the weight ratio is about 55/45 (and in case of my car probably 50/50 due to 300 pounds of gear in the trunk). The multilink front suspension was one of the reasons why I did buy that car. My mechanic started breathing heavily when he examined the setup first.
wink.gif
I do prefer mild understeer because it does offer more predictable behavior. As for torque steer, it's categorically annoying and should be eliminated as much as possible.
 
Last edited:
Quote:


Quote:


Either the front suspension is typically Macpherson strut or Double a-arm...torque steer has more to do with the halfshafts and amount of power. Generally the whole reason for FWD is it keeps cost down and it allows more interior space.




I wasn't talking about the cause of torque steer. I was talking about how to minimize it -- which is through suspension design.

My old Scirocco with simple McPherson strut front exhibited a massive amount of torque steer with an anemic 95 hp engine and 225/50 tires. My Audi with its rather complicated front suspension setup shows no noticeable torque steer. Its multilink (not double-A arm) front suspension was specifically designed to eliminate not only torque steer bute also to a large degree understeer.




I'll bet the Audi also has equal length half-shafts. As mentioned unequal length half shafts are the biggest contributor to torque steer. And I agree even with an anemic engine you can still have gobs of torque steer. Witness my '04 Civic.
grin.gif
 
Another bad one was the twin turbo Volvo S80...you could floor it from a stop then once you came over the turbo lag you would be shot into the oncoming lane haha. I didn't like those cars.
 
I haven't noticed any torque steer in the FWD A4 either, Pete. I know the quattro has equal length half shafts, but I don't know about the FWD.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom