What capacity is better ?

Is there a better in oil capacity?

Well, certainly, more oil allows for more stable temps, and longer drain intervals, but it means that a change costs a bit more. It really depends on the application. My old 4 Runner was 5 quarts, but burned a quart every 1,500 miles, so, yeah, a convenient jug for the change, but I was buying quarts anyway. Current fleet:

Both V-12s - 10
Packard - 8
Tundra - 8
All the Volvos - 6

For the V-12s, it’s two jugs of Mobil 1 0W40, or 10 quarts of HPL. No worries either way. Since I buy HPL, or AMSOIL, in a case, of 1 quart bottles, I’m not worried about jug size or jug/oil change ratio, but if I were buying jugs, all the other cars require multiple jugs with large remainders.
 
There are a lot of factors to consider when designing engines. Some that I hadn't thought of were things such as what kind of terrain is the vehicle intended for. In other words, if it's going to be used to climb hills, etc.
I heard once that the Caddy Northstar (transverse mount) needed 7.5 qts of oil, since it was designed (in some models) to pull 1.5 G's through a corner. Smaller capacity could have starved the oil pump in that situation.
 
There are a lot of factors to consider when designing engines. Some that I hadn't thought of were things such as what kind of terrain is the vehicle intended for. In other words, if it's going to be used to climb hills, etc.
I heard once that the Caddy Northstar (transverse mount) needed 7.5 qts of oil, since it was designed (in some models) to pull 1.5 G's through a corner. Smaller capacity could have starved the oil pump in that situation.
Why wouldn’t they use a dry sump in that situation?
 
Back
Top Bottom