Valvoline vs Mobil 1 - Round 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Johnny


You should try the Amsoil 0W-20, it is really good oil.


I'm really leaning that way, sad truth is I just changed my oil about a week ago. Sometimes a company can benefit from this kind of p*.*s fight by sitting back and doing nothing. I think there are a lot of people that think like I do and because of the way this news hit would rather stay clear of both compaines. I see Pennzoil, Amsoil and a host of others gaining because of this. I bet they're licking their chops too!

The tone of Mobils reply just about put me over the top. I handled a lot of CS issues over the years, and they really dropped the ball with their reply.

Frank D
 
I know Mobil knows where this info is coming from. They are just beating around the bush. Ashland sent them the letter we are all talking about.

Mobil will not tell anyone there product dose not meet the Specs unless it is proven in the court of law. That may be why we are not seeing or hearing any thing from Mobil right now. If they do take this to law and they lose, they have some MAJOR problems on there hands like Class action lawsuits, Loseing ALL there OEM contracts, loseing a MAJOR cutomer base, ect. . . Perhaps Mobil is just going to keep quite redo there oil(it has not been at stores for a while) and pretend like nothing happen.
 
That could very well be, we have to see how this plays out. I have honestly lost a lot of respect for Mobil 1 oils today. It looks like Ashland's marketing is working on me anyway. But it won't get them any of my cash, I won't using any of their oil either.

Frank D
 
Yea I dont usally use Valvoline. But, Due to todays information, I would use Valvoline in my bronco and in my moms car.

I do not hold any "bad" feeling to Ashland for bringing this info out on the table. This is bold moves. If anything, I hold a bit more respect for Ashland and Valvline.(pending the allegations are true)
 
Everything is cyclical. Things change. My main issue with Valvoline has been their hang up on extended drain intervals and lack of OEM approvals, but that seems to be changing. Other than that they seem to make a quality oil.
 
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT
demarpaint, why do you dislike Valvoline so much?


Its been over 30 years so I'm a little fuzzy on it. IIRC I had a 72 Mustang 302, that had a lifter noise, and used oil (at least I thought it did). I bought the car used and in previous cars I used Valvoline oil so I tried it in the Mustang. Anyway for probably 10,000 miles it used about 1 qt/1000 miles. Being a little OCD as a kid it really bothered me. A local repair shop said I probably needed engine work because Valvoline was such a great oil I shouldn't be using so much. A friend told me to try Pennzoil, I did, lifter noise stopped oil use cut in half. Old memories die hard.

Frank D
 
I could see if it was borderline, say around 90-100 microns, but 180ul? Yikes. Double the allowable limit of 90 microns.
 
Here is a link outlining the test in question: http://www.swri.org/4ORG/D08/GasTests/iva.pdf (you will need Adobe Reader or some other PDF program)

If this were based on cold starting I would be more concerned, but most engines are in this temperature range for only a matter of 30 to 90 seconds while driving.

Looking at the list of specs for Mobil 1 in that grade it seems like it is more geared toward being a higher temperature engine oil. That may shed some light as to why it (quote) underperforms (unquote) on some tests. Call it the caveat of gaining in one area but losing some in another.

I have some leftover Mobil 1 5w30 in my closet that I was considering using once my fiance's Cobalt is due in a couple weeks. Honestly I don't think this will stop me from putting it in there because of the operating conditions of the test. I don't think I'll lose any sleep over it. :2cents:
 
Last edited:
You are right, this is one test measuring one type of wear. As you said above, most engines are in this temp. range shortly.

The problem is, and as the letter states, you can't claim API SM/ILSAC GF4 if you don't score lower than 90ul.
 
And it would, as the letter states, invalidate it's certifications for both Honda's HTO-06 and GM's 4718.

This is big. This is EPIC.

And Mobil has yet to reply to me.
 
Originally Posted By: Liquid_Turbo
I need to know the results of this ASAP so I can decide whether to use my last remaining stash of M1. Haha.


Don't chance it. Send it to me and I will dispose of it properly.
 
This is a huge strategic move by Ashland and well thought out. some of you act like Ashland has no legal counsel, just a few guys decided to do this?

I think they're playing off the public discontent with Exxon's record profits the past two years. They let XOM know and ran the tests, double, triple, zintuple-checked it. They found that it failed. After much strategizing and mental chess, they decided to do this. If they can lure some M1 users to switch to them, it will all pay off, legal fees included.
 
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
And it would, as the letter states, invalidate it's certifications for both Honda's HTO-06 and GM's 4718.

This is big. This is EPIC.

And Mobil has yet to reply to me.


I wonder if you'll get the same response my brother got?

Frank D
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
And it would, as the letter states, invalidate it's certifications for both Honda's HTO-06 and GM's 4718.

This is big. This is EPIC.

And Mobil has yet to reply to me.


I wonder if you'll get the same response my brother got?

Frank D


I hope not.

-Chris
 
Glad I switched the 'Vette to PP now.

Heck, even YBP meets GF-4.

Now to find those Walmart receipts for the M1 in the oil stash........

Looks like the M1 shortage might be fixed soon.
 
Originally Posted By: SilverC6

Heck, even YBP meets GF-4.



It wouldn't surprise me if quite a few brands don't actually meet the spec.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom