Don't give away the answer, shhh.
Toyota Recall - Largest Ever!
- Thread starter webfors
- Start date
- Status
OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
And I laugh at the Toyota trucker proclaiming his Tundra does 60-110 in 5 seconds!!!
Utter [censored]
My wife was in the truck with me and witnessed it too. So laugh all you want.
It was timed and verified with radar?
Listen, there isn't a snowball's chance in h3ll that a 6,000lb pick-up truck is doing 60-110Mph faster than more powerful car that weighs half as much.
The 2010 BMW M3 weighs 3,600lbs, has 414HP, and does 60-120Mph in 4.1 seconds.
It also runs the 1/4 mile TWO ENTIRE SECONDS FASTER than your truck, coming in at 12.5 @ 114Mph.
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
And I laugh at the Toyota trucker proclaiming his Tundra does 60-110 in 5 seconds!!!
Utter [censored]
My wife was in the truck with me and witnessed it too. So laugh all you want.
It was timed and verified with radar?
Listen, there isn't a snowball's chance in h3ll that a 6,000lb pick-up truck is doing 60-110Mph faster than more powerful car that weighs half as much.
The 2010 BMW M3 weighs 3,600lbs, has 414HP, and does 60-120Mph in 4.1 seconds.
It also runs the 1/4 mile TWO ENTIRE SECONDS FASTER than your truck, coming in at 12.5 @ 114Mph.
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
So based on those calculations from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour, we believe it is not unreasonable, as has been asserted here by a few, to achieve another 50 MPH in around the similar time frame.
Whoa! Not even close, not even in the ballpark. At a minimum, double those figures. In fact it's likely closer to triple the 0-60 to get the 60-120mph. The only time you're going to see similar 0-60 and 60-120mph times is when the car is traction limited the entire way to 60 mph and beyond.
So based on those calculations from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour, we believe it is not unreasonable, as has been asserted here by a few, to achieve another 50 MPH in around the similar time frame.
Whoa! Not even close, not even in the ballpark. At a minimum, double those figures. In fact it's likely closer to triple the 0-60 to get the 60-120mph. The only time you're going to see similar 0-60 and 60-120mph times is when the car is traction limited the entire way to 60 mph and beyond.
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Listen, there isn't a snowball's chance in h3ll that a 6,000lb pick-up truck is doing 60-110Mph faster than more powerful car that weighs half as much.
But it's not just any pickup, it's a TOYOTA!!!11!!11!111!!
It bendsthe rules of fizzics!!!
Listen, there isn't a snowball's chance in h3ll that a 6,000lb pick-up truck is doing 60-110Mph faster than more powerful car that weighs half as much.
But it's not just any pickup, it's a TOYOTA!!!11!!11!111!!
It bendsthe rules of fizzics!!!
OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: brianl703
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Listen, there isn't a snowball's chance in h3ll that a 6,000lb pick-up truck is doing 60-110Mph faster than more powerful car that weighs half as much.
But it's not just any pickup, it's a TOYOTA!!!11!!11!111!!
It bendsthe rules of fizzics!!!
HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Listen, there isn't a snowball's chance in h3ll that a 6,000lb pick-up truck is doing 60-110Mph faster than more powerful car that weighs half as much.
But it's not just any pickup, it's a TOYOTA!!!11!!11!111!!
It bendsthe rules of fizzics!!!
HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
So based on those calculations from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour, we believe it is not unreasonable, as has been asserted here by a few, to achieve another 50 MPH in around the similar time frame.
Whoa! Not even close, not even in the ballpark. At a minimum, double those figures. In fact it's likely closer to triple the 0-60 to get the 60-120mph. The only time you're going to see similar 0-60 and 60-120mph times is when the car is traction limited the entire way to 60 mph and beyond.
Come on man, you know the Tundra is faster than your GN
LMAO!!!!!!
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
So based on those calculations from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour, we believe it is not unreasonable, as has been asserted here by a few, to achieve another 50 MPH in around the similar time frame.
Whoa! Not even close, not even in the ballpark. At a minimum, double those figures. In fact it's likely closer to triple the 0-60 to get the 60-120mph. The only time you're going to see similar 0-60 and 60-120mph times is when the car is traction limited the entire way to 60 mph and beyond.
Come on man, you know the Tundra is faster than your GN
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
So based on those calculations from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour, we believe it is not unreasonable, as has been asserted here by a few, to achieve another 50 MPH in around the similar time frame.
Whoa! Not even close, not even in the ballpark. At a minimum, double those figures. In fact it's likely closer to triple the 0-60 to get the 60-120mph. The only time you're going to see similar 0-60 and 60-120mph times is when the car is traction limited the entire way to 60 mph and beyond.
Come on man, you know the Tundra is faster than your GN
LMAO!!!!!!
Well from the sound of the Tundra owner it sounds like it would give me a run for my money lol.
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
So based on those calculations from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour, we believe it is not unreasonable, as has been asserted here by a few, to achieve another 50 MPH in around the similar time frame.
Whoa! Not even close, not even in the ballpark. At a minimum, double those figures. In fact it's likely closer to triple the 0-60 to get the 60-120mph. The only time you're going to see similar 0-60 and 60-120mph times is when the car is traction limited the entire way to 60 mph and beyond.
Come on man, you know the Tundra is faster than your GN
Well from the sound of the Tundra owner it sounds like it would give me a run for my money lol.
OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
So based on those calculations from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour, we believe it is not unreasonable, as has been asserted here by a few, to achieve another 50 MPH in around the similar time frame.
Whoa! Not even close, not even in the ballpark. At a minimum, double those figures. In fact it's likely closer to triple the 0-60 to get the 60-120mph. The only time you're going to see similar 0-60 and 60-120mph times is when the car is traction limited the entire way to 60 mph and beyond.
Come on man, you know the Tundra is faster than your GN
LMAO!!!!!!
Well from the sound of the Tundra owner it sounds like it would give me a run for my money lol.
Just think man, you could have just bought a stock Tundra and been dusting modified 'stangs and F-bodies left right and centre!
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
So based on those calculations from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour, we believe it is not unreasonable, as has been asserted here by a few, to achieve another 50 MPH in around the similar time frame.
Whoa! Not even close, not even in the ballpark. At a minimum, double those figures. In fact it's likely closer to triple the 0-60 to get the 60-120mph. The only time you're going to see similar 0-60 and 60-120mph times is when the car is traction limited the entire way to 60 mph and beyond.
Come on man, you know the Tundra is faster than your GN
Well from the sound of the Tundra owner it sounds like it would give me a run for my money lol.
Just think man, you could have just bought a stock Tundra and been dusting modified 'stangs and F-bodies left right and centre!
Originally Posted By: BrianWC
How did this thread go from floor mats to a Tundra doing its impression of an SR-71?
You're way behind the news today BrianWC
, Toyota already found an elegant and discrete solution to the floor mat problem, therefore there is no need to discuss floor mats anymore.
just check out the thread called "Lexus cable-tie mat hold down system" in this section.
How did this thread go from floor mats to a Tundra doing its impression of an SR-71?
You're way behind the news today BrianWC
just check out the thread called "Lexus cable-tie mat hold down system" in this section.
Amkeer,
What you have proposed doesn't pass the logic test. I believe another way of saying it is that you are mistaken. I have no idea of your intentions so I try to believe that y'all simply had a lapse of something. However, please feel free to put a video up on Youtube to prove us wrong. 60-120 in 5s from a stock Tundra will garner a lot of hits.
What you have proposed doesn't pass the logic test. I believe another way of saying it is that you are mistaken. I have no idea of your intentions so I try to believe that y'all simply had a lapse of something. However, please feel free to put a video up on Youtube to prove us wrong. 60-120 in 5s from a stock Tundra will garner a lot of hits.
Well, if you go fast enough, your perception of time slows down...
I never said 60-120.It was 60-110. If you have two people that witness the same thing I guess the YOU part falls to the wayside. I was as shocked as anyone else about the speed achieved. Keep in mind that I have owned a Z-28, Trans Am, and two RS Camaro's in my time. This truck is by far one of the quickest rides. But hey if you don't believe me that is fine. I am not out to prove anything, especially when it comes to rolling pieces of steel.
The 1/4 mile times on that truck put it on par with a stock Fox body Mustang from 20 years ago.
OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: brianl703
The 1/4 mile times on that truck put it on par with a stock Fox body Mustang from 20 years ago.
Yup.
Mine went 14.2 @ 99.9Mph BONE STOCK. With 285,000Km on it.
The 1/4 mile times on that truck put it on par with a stock Fox body Mustang from 20 years ago.
Yup.
Mine went 14.2 @ 99.9Mph BONE STOCK. With 285,000Km on it.
OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: Amkeer
So you are either calling me a liar or you do not believe me. Actually, my wife thinks it is ridiculous since you don't believe her either, but nevertheless, we will leave it at that.
Actually, it is physics that is calling you a liar. A 5,600lb truck with 381HP doesn't have the power to do 60-110Mph in 5 seconds.
Its 0-60 time as tested is 6.9 seconds.
Your 60-120Mph time is always close to DOUBLE that value due to aerodynamics.
Here are the 60-120Mph times for a pile of cars:
http://www.car-videos.net/performance/speed.asp?Speed1=60&Speed2=120
On that list:
Bugatti Veyron: 4.95s
Mercedes CLK-GTR: 5.59s
Lamborghini Diablo: 7.88s
So yeah, a Tundra is going to do it in 5.00s......
So you are either calling me a liar or you do not believe me. Actually, my wife thinks it is ridiculous since you don't believe her either, but nevertheless, we will leave it at that.
Actually, it is physics that is calling you a liar. A 5,600lb truck with 381HP doesn't have the power to do 60-110Mph in 5 seconds.
Its 0-60 time as tested is 6.9 seconds.
Your 60-120Mph time is always close to DOUBLE that value due to aerodynamics.
Here are the 60-120Mph times for a pile of cars:
http://www.car-videos.net/performance/speed.asp?Speed1=60&Speed2=120
On that list:
Bugatti Veyron: 4.95s
Mercedes CLK-GTR: 5.59s
Lamborghini Diablo: 7.88s
So yeah, a Tundra is going to do it in 5.00s......
- Status
Similar threads
