Thoughts on TXV (thermal expansion valve) v.s. piston?

Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
1,010
Location
Indiana
I'm planning on replacing my HVAC system in the Fall and I'm debating on whether to go with a TXV versus piston in the evaporator.

Operationally it seems that a TXV would be superior but I'm mildly concerned about the reliability. There isn't any worries that a piston would ever fail.

Any thoughts or experiences?

BTW This will be a standard 13 or 14 SEER, single stage, 3-ton configuration.
 
The efficiency of TXV better than a piston. We would replace a piston with TXV to make systems more efficient, increase seer rating.
Both piston and TXV can fail from trash in lines. Stopping them up. But proper installed system, flush lines, replacing filter driers and pulling vacuum will remove containment.
 
The one advantage to a piston is that it's super simple and a bit less susceptible to debris clogging the orifice. That's about it's only benefit. The disadvantage is that a piston is only "right" for one outdoor temp, and all other temps are some form of compromise which can greatly affect efficiency.

The advantage to TXVs is that they adjust the flow relative to the pressure differential for any outdoor ambient load; a far better system all the way around. They are a tad more susceptible to debris, but this is a function of the cleanliness of the install job. If the install is done well, TXVs last a very long time! Here's why I say that cleanliness is key to reliability ... Metering devices (in this case we're talking TXVs) which are factory installed (such as packaged roof-top units) use the same TXVs which are put into traditional split systems. Because the packaged units are factory sealed and charged, the failure rate of TXVs is very low. However, split systems which require field install (lineset brazing, vacuuming, charging) have those same TXVs fail at a rate about 10x (TEN TIMES) more often! So it's not the issue of TXVs being unreliable; it's the topic of sloppy install work in the field.

I recommend you get the TXV, and then make sure you talk with the installer about the necessity of a super clean job.
 
The one advantage to a piston is that it's super simple and a bit less susceptible to debris clogging the orifice. That's about it's only benefit. The disadvantage is that a piston is only "right" for one outdoor temp, and all other temps are some form of compromise which can greatly affect efficiency.

The advantage to TXVs is that they adjust the flow relative to the pressure differential for any outdoor ambient load; a far better system all the way around. They are a tad more susceptible to debris, but this is a function of the cleanliness of the install job. If the install is done well, TXVs last a very long time! Here's why I say that cleanliness is key to reliability ... Metering devices (in this case we're talking TXVs) which are factory installed (such as packaged roof-top units) use the same TXVs which are put into traditional split systems. Because the packaged units are factory sealed and charged, the failure rate of TXVs is very low. However, split systems which require field install (lineset brazing, vacuuming, charging) have those same TXVs fail at a rate about 10x (TEN TIMES) more often! So it's not the issue of TXVs being unreliable; it's the topic of sloppy install work in the field.

I recommend you get the TXV, and then make sure you talk with the installer about the necessity of a super clean job.
That pretty much confirms what I'e heard and read. I will be sure to specify an evaporator coil with the TXV factory (rather than field) installed.

Thanks for the responses.
 
That pretty much confirms what I'e heard and read. I will be sure to specify an evaporator coil with the TXV factory (rather than field) installed.

Even if it's factory installed, there's still a problem of contamination getting into the system before and even when the lineset is brazed to the evaporator coil and condensing unit.
 
Back
Top