I was recently reminded of the value of proper diagnosis and how listening to and following "the masses" can be misleading. Here's a brief story to illustrate. Hopefully, this little anecdote will save someone else some time.
About 2 months ago (after a year of monitoring a steadily increasing rate of oil loss on the sig block Camry) and after ruling out any bottom end leak source via cleaning and visual inspection and after hearing "the masses" frequently proclaim that a top-end oil leak must have the VC gasket as the culprit, I replaced its VC gasket and expected that would fully remedy the leak.
Now, after monitoring the rate of oil loss since then, I see that replacing the VC gasket had extremely little to zero effect on slowing the loss rate. So, I did some additional visual inspection and investigation and arrived at the conclusion that the real perpetrator all along appears to be the VC gasket's neighbor and that doing this job is in my future.
I'm definitely re-using the gasket.

About 2 months ago (after a year of monitoring a steadily increasing rate of oil loss on the sig block Camry) and after ruling out any bottom end leak source via cleaning and visual inspection and after hearing "the masses" frequently proclaim that a top-end oil leak must have the VC gasket as the culprit, I replaced its VC gasket and expected that would fully remedy the leak.
Now, after monitoring the rate of oil loss since then, I see that replacing the VC gasket had extremely little to zero effect on slowing the loss rate. So, I did some additional visual inspection and investigation and arrived at the conclusion that the real perpetrator all along appears to be the VC gasket's neighbor and that doing this job is in my future.

Last edited: