Originally Posted By: rg200amp
Originally Posted By: Rolf
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Plenty of us, search back a few years.........Then do some comparisons to Amsoil or PP to name a few.
"... in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."
—Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X
.
No, there are MANY UOAs out there that show other brands of oil work just as good and some better than mobil 1.
We are not just takeing everyones word on it and accepting it as fact.
FWIW Mein Kampf was the most boring writing I have ever read.
Do UOA's really tell us that?
Or do they tell us how a particular oil is doing in terms of handling contamination and how it is holding up via TBN?
Because determining "works just as well" and "better" would involve extensive testing including tear downs, deposit accumulation tests, cleanliness tests....etc........
