Tesla profits

Status
Not open for further replies.
Time to put the public cow back in the barn, let Tesla make it on its own or go bust, either one is fine with me.
Numerous financial advisers and I think more than a few Tesla employees more or less have said without carbon offset credits they most likely would have gone bankrupt the first time. They were six weeks out and scraped by the skin of their teeth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The other manufacturers were free to produce their own low/zero emissions vehicles and earn credits, no one was stopping them. This is simply an efficient market method for reducing emissions across the nation and thats clearly a desirable outcome.

To be clear, these are not taxpayer funds - something the article reluctantly admits if you read it.
 
The other manufacturers were free to produce their own low/zero emissions vehicles and earn credits, no one was stopping them. This is simply an efficient market method for reducing emissions across the nation and thats clearly a desirable outcome.

To be clear, these are not taxpayer funds - something the article reluctantly admits if you read it.
It is nothing more than a shameless fraud.
 
Musk is a really a terrible CEO to push around political leanings publically that won’t support the cash cow and profitability of his shareholders….
 
That’s a strange comment. Do you understand what it’s intended to achieve and how it works?

If so, I’d be interested to know why you think it’s a “fraud”?

I have been looking into this since the money making scheme was conjured up years ago. The EU and even the environmentalist are questioning the practice.
Does the EU have carbon credits?


The EU has banned international carbon offsets from its emissions market since 2020, owing to concerns about cheap international credits with low environmental standards. It has since taken a strict stance on the use of carbon credits, which cannot be counted towards meeting the EU's 2030 emissions-cutting target.Apr 17, 2024
Is the EU banning carbon offsets?


Terms such as “climate neutral” or “climate positive” that rely on offsetting will be banned from the EU by 2026 as part of a crackdown on misleading environmental claims.
https://www.theecoexperts.co.uk/blog/carbon-offsetting
 
I can only see it going downhill for Tesla from here on out. Musk is far too busy these days arguing about politics on his new "News" platform to actually concentrate on growing a proper company. If I worked for Tesla right now I'd be quickly looking at other jobs before he turns it into a total car crash.
 
Sure I get it, Tesla sells other companies carbon credits so they can sell vehicles that pollute more. Explain it to me.
Carbon credits and carbon offsetting are basically the same thing.
 
Last edited:
Sure I get it, Tesla sells other companies carbon credits so they can sell vehicles that pollute more. Explain it to me.
Carbon credits and carbon offsetting are the same thing.
No, you don’t get it. They’re totally different systems.

There are a number of legitimate concerns about the validity of some offsets schemes, whilst others are more transparent. It’s a big market and a lot of players - we’d be here for weeks explaining to you all the details of that one but suffice to say conceptually it’s a good idea and lot of national and globally traded offset markets are legit. Some aren’t…

However, none of that has anything to do with the credits traded under the US emissions regulatory system - they’re not credits or offsets sold on the open market, they’re only traded within the auto industry. Tesla’s main customer is Stellantis who make a lot of highly polluting cars, so they buy credits from Tesla rather than making lower emissions and meeting the corporate average targets.
 
Please, don't whiz on my shoes and tell me its raining which is exactly what you are doing. Regardless of the scheme nothing is being bought or sold, nothing, it is just money changing hands. You admit Stellantis continues to manufacture vehicles that produce higher emissions so what did this scam actually accomplish?
I just got the following message in Ford Pass:

“The fact that you drive a Mustang Mach-E tells us that you’re already on board with the whole carbon-neutral thing. Now, there’s one more thing you can do to help.

Opt in to the Ford Sustainable Charging program and we’ll use feedback from your vehicle to generate low-carbon fuel standard credits. Then, with the money generated from those credits, we’ll reinvest in vehicle electrification by exploring new technology and increasing public outreach regarding the benefits of electrification
That doesnt look like credits are only changed between auto manufacturers.

conceptually it’s a good idea
Sure it is if you are selling these credits but you just said the credits are bought so the company can continue making vehicles that pollute more and they pay Tesla to do it. If that is not a scam and a total fraud nothing is.
 
That’s a strange comment. Do you understand what it’s intended to achieve and how it works?

If so, I’d be interested to know why you think it’s a “fraud”?
If the Government wanted to tax whatever industry or company you work for I'm sure you'd think differently.
 
Agree, I have a few friends with own Teslas, one actually 2, a Model 3 and Y. He has deleted his twitter account and it's the last 2 he will buy he said.
Don't blame him at all! Elons hardly the figurehead you want representing a company. I'd certainly not buy one of his cars. Besides, there are plenty of better quality electric cars out there now as well.
 
Please, don't whiz on my shoes and tell me its raining which is exactly what you are doing. Regardless of the scheme nothing is being bought or sold, nothing, it is just money changing hands. You admit Stellantis continues to manufacture vehicles that produce higher emissions so what did this scam actually accomplish?

That doesnt look like credits are only changed between auto manufacturers.


Sure it is if you are selling these credits but you just said the credits are bought so the company can continue making vehicles that pollute more and they pay Tesla to do it. If that is not a scam and a total fraud nothing is.
Do you really not understand? It’s an incentive - it costs Stellantis money to pollute and Tesla is incentivised for producing low emissions cars. Tesla being financially supported is the whole bloody point! The outcome is lower emissions overall - it makes those idiot giant “trucks”‘of yours more expensive and EVs cheaper and gets more EVs on the road.

It’s not rocket surgery and I’m not clear how that’s not clear…
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom